16.11.2012 Views

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTORS INFLUENCING <strong>THE</strong> USE OF PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES …<br />

the past because in societies with strong son preference, those who had<br />

sons are more likely to use contraception and stop childbearing.<br />

Data on altitude are available only from NFHS-2. When births<br />

during the 0-14 years before the survey are considered, there is a meek<br />

indication that higher altitudes reduce the chance male birth. This may<br />

be because of lower temperature and higher male foetal mortality at<br />

higher altitudes. It is also possible that people living at higher altitudes<br />

are genetically different from those living in low-lying areas. The information<br />

on consanguinity was collected only in NFHS-1. It shows<br />

no statistically significant relationship with the SRB. But owing to the<br />

limitations of the information on consanguinity collected in NFHS-1, it<br />

served as a poor proxy for the level of inbreeding. In all the regressions,<br />

even after controlling for the foregoing factors, the SRB is significantly<br />

higher in north-western and north-central regions. This could<br />

be because of greater misuse of PNDT in these parts. However, as<br />

these regional differences are also significant (but smaller) in the regressions<br />

that use NFHS-1 data, they may be indicating the presence of<br />

some genetic factors such as levels of circulating gonadotropin, or a<br />

tendency to underreport of female births in northern India.<br />

4. Summary and Conclusion<br />

In recent years the use of prenatal diagnostic techniques (PNDT),<br />

followed by sex-selective abortion has emerged as a powerful determinant<br />

of SRB in India. In this chapter we have analysed the factors<br />

influencing the use of PNDT as well as SRB. We present evidence<br />

from the recently released data on fertility from the 2001 Census as<br />

well as from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS). The census<br />

fertility data suggest that SRB in India may have increased to 110, and<br />

in some areas, to as high as 130. But the data may have been affected<br />

by underreporting of female births. But even this data show that the<br />

SRB in southern and eastern India is well within the range observed<br />

under normal circumstances, thus discount the possibility of widespread<br />

use of sex-selective abortions in these areas. The census data<br />

also show that though there may be little rural-urban difference in the<br />

SRB, among the educated class the SRB is abnormally high.<br />

The data collected in NFHS-2 (1998-99) show that thirteen percent<br />

of live births were subjected to PNDT, and six percent of female<br />

foetuses may have been aborted after PNDT. But, if possible underreporting<br />

is taken into account, PNDT may have been used in fourteen<br />

percent of the cases, and in seventeen percent of such cases female<br />

foetuses may have been aborted. The use of PNDT is higher in south-<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!