16.11.2012 Views

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66<br />

P. AROKIASAMY<br />

The odds of utilization of full vaccination are estimated for male<br />

and female children and by birth order of children with separate regression<br />

model for each of the five regions. Figure 5 and 6 compares<br />

the odds of using health care (full vaccinations) between the sexes by<br />

birth order. The shortfall in the odds ratio of vaccination use for girls<br />

compared to boys of respective birth order constitutes the extent of<br />

female discrimination in health care. Both NFHS-1 and NFHS-2 data<br />

show that in North and North Cental regions, the odds of being fully<br />

vaccinated for all birth orders of female children are lower compared<br />

with boys of the same birth order. The odds of a child being fully<br />

vaccinated tend also to decline for girls of higher birth order compared<br />

to boys of same birth order. By contrast, the odds ratios indicate only<br />

minor differences between the sexes in the southern region.<br />

Figure 5 Sex differentials in health care (all vaccination) for children aged 12-<br />

47 months by birth order (birord) and region, NFHS-1, 1992-93<br />

Odds ratio of children receiving health care (ref: birod1)<br />

1,2<br />

1,0<br />

0,8<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0,0<br />

birord1<br />

birord 2-3<br />

birord 4-5<br />

birord 6+<br />

birord1<br />

birord 2-3<br />

birord 4-5<br />

birord 6+<br />

birord1<br />

birord 2-3<br />

birord 4-5<br />

birord 6+<br />

birord1<br />

birord 2-3<br />

birord 4-5<br />

birord 6+<br />

Male Female<br />

birord1<br />

birord 2-3<br />

birord 4-5<br />

birord 6+<br />

North Northcentral East West South<br />

Note: Odds ratios of children receiving care by sex-and specific rank order (see details in<br />

source).<br />

Source: Arokiasamy (2004).<br />

The discrimination of female children in health care negates the<br />

biological advantage that female children have. Providing modern<br />

health care services always involves expenses, and when sons are perceived<br />

to be more important than daughters, parents are more willing<br />

to incur health care costs for sons than daughters. Therefore, the<br />

extent of female discrimination in health care across the regions is<br />

tions of data that either leads to insignificant evidence or unreliable measurement<br />

about female neglect in curative treatment (Timaeus et al., 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!