16.11.2012 Views

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

WATERING THE NEIGHBOUR'S GARDEN: THE GROWING - CICRED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIAL NETWORKS AND SON PREFERENCE AMONG RURAL-URBAN MIGRANTS …<br />

and increase with birth order. Thus the childbearing behaviour of<br />

these migrants exhibits strong son preference.<br />

Second, social network factors have significant impacts on<br />

attitudes and behaviours related to son preference among rural-urban<br />

migrants (Shye et al., 1995; Bongaarts and Watkins, 1996; Friedkin,<br />

1997; Kohler et al., 2001). Weak ties in the childbearing discussion<br />

network contribute to a decrease in the risk of having an attitude of<br />

son preference after migration. This suggests that the weak ties defined<br />

by occupation or so called “social stratification”, such as managers,<br />

owners of private enterprise, professional or technical person and<br />

government officers could influence these migrants’ attitudes towards<br />

childbearing.<br />

Third, migration factors have effects: the older the individual at<br />

first migration, the higher the likelihood of having son preference<br />

attitude. Thus, age cohort is an important factor in son preference (Hui<br />

et al., 2001). The risk of having an attitude of son preference decreases<br />

as the number of years lived in urban areas increases, suggesting that<br />

evolution away from preference occurs during the process of migrants’<br />

adaptation to cities (Riley, 1971; Hui et al., 2001; Harding and Jencks,<br />

2003). The longer the migrants live in the urban areas, the higher the<br />

likelihood that they have similar attitudes and behaviours towards son<br />

preference to permanent urban residents (Yu et al., 1996). In addition,<br />

the effect of years lived in urban areas on the son preference behaviour<br />

appears after eight years, but on son preference attitude it appears after<br />

one year. Thus the change in childbearing behaviour lags far behind the<br />

change of reported attitude. The older the migrants at first migration,<br />

the stronger the attitude of son preference and the lower risk of<br />

having a boy at second birth. Thus older age at first migration would<br />

lead to postponement of the second birth. With increasing age and<br />

years of living in urban areas, the attitude of son preference tends to<br />

become weaker, as does the behaviour of son preference. The factor<br />

“times back home per year” does not have effects on either the attitude<br />

or behaviour of son preference among migrants. These results suggest<br />

that changes in attitudes and behaviours of son preference among<br />

migrants are mainly driven by social interaction.<br />

Finally, education and sex composition of children ever born<br />

affect attitudes and behaviours of son preference among rural-urban<br />

migrants. The higher the education level, the higher the risk of having<br />

son preference, and the higher possibility of having a boy at the second<br />

birth. This is consistent with findings of other studies (Wu et al., 2005).<br />

Sex composition of children ever born has a significant effect on the<br />

attitude and behaviour of son preference (Gao, 1993). Rural-urban<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!