24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 Chapter 4<br />

and Additional Protocol II, both <strong>of</strong> which apply to <strong>in</strong>ternal armed<br />

conflicts. Given its pari materia nature with article 3 <strong>of</strong> the Geneva<br />

Conventions and Additional Protocol II, the Chamber concluded that<br />

article 3 <strong>of</strong> the Statute <strong>of</strong> the SCSL applies to <strong>in</strong>ternal armed conflicts. 101<br />

Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II<br />

forms part <strong>of</strong> customary <strong>in</strong>ternational law applicable to both <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

and non-<strong>in</strong>ternational armed conflicts. 102<br />

The Chamber held that all parties to the armed conflict - whether state<br />

or non-state actors – are bound by <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian law. 103<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the unanimity <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational law theorists and lawyers on<br />

the duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surgents to observe the provisions <strong>of</strong> article 3 common to the<br />

Geneva Conventions, ‘there is now no doubt that this article is b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

states and <strong>in</strong>surgents alike and that <strong>in</strong>surgents are subject to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

law’. 104 Hence, even armed groups have to respect <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

humanitarian law. Taken <strong>in</strong> this way, all parties to the armed conflict <strong>in</strong><br />

Sierra Leone were bound to respect <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian law.<br />

2.7 Crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility for <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes<br />

The SCSL issued decisions that contribute to the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

responsibility. Three types <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility for <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

crimes are exam<strong>in</strong>ed here: <strong>in</strong>dividual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility, superior<br />

responsibility and command responsibility.<br />

2.7.1 Individual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility<br />

The Appeals Chamber provided a test to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether a violation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian law is subject to crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility. With<br />

regards to <strong>in</strong>dividual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility, the Chamber set specific<br />

requirements for a crime to attract <strong>in</strong>dividual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility under<br />

article 6(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statute <strong>of</strong> the SCSL. The follow<strong>in</strong>g are the requirements:<br />

‘the violation must constitute an <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement <strong>of</strong> a rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

humanitarian law’; ‘the rule must be customary <strong>in</strong> nature or, if it belongs<br />

to treaty law, the required conditions must be met’; ‘the violation must be<br />

“serious”, that is to say, it must constitute a breach <strong>of</strong> a rule protect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

important values, and the breach must <strong>in</strong>volve grave consequences for the<br />

victim […]’ and; ‘the violation <strong>of</strong> the rule must entail, under customary or<br />

conventional law, the <strong>in</strong>dividual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility <strong>of</strong> the person<br />

101 Prosecutor v F<strong>of</strong>ana para 20.<br />

102 Prosecutor v F<strong>of</strong>ana paras 21-27; see also paras 18-20.<br />

103 Prosecutor v Norman Decision on prelim<strong>in</strong>ary motion based on lack <strong>of</strong> jurisdiction (child<br />

recruitment) 31 May 2004 paras 22-23.<br />

104 Prosecutor v Kallon and Kamara para 45.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!