Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
280 Chapter 13<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the establishment and subsequent operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Court. In the first place, it is important to recall that <strong>Africa</strong>n states played<br />
a central role <strong>in</strong> the adoption <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute. 17 It must be noted <strong>in</strong><br />
this regard, that <strong>Africa</strong>n countries were especially active dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
negotiations for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Court and they made detailed and<br />
extensive contributions dur<strong>in</strong>g the negotiation process. 18 For example,<br />
Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n states, Malawi <strong>in</strong>cluded, played a very important role <strong>in</strong><br />
the negotiations lead<strong>in</strong>g to the establishment <strong>of</strong> the ICC. 19 Further, at least<br />
47 <strong>Africa</strong>n states were represented dur<strong>in</strong>g the draft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute<br />
and many <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Africa</strong>n countries were members <strong>of</strong> the Like-M<strong>in</strong>ded<br />
Group that pushed for the adoption <strong>of</strong> the Statute. 20 Strik<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>Africa</strong><br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s the most heavily represented region <strong>in</strong> the Court’s membership, <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> state party ratification <strong>of</strong> the Statute. 21 The <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />
<strong>in</strong> the draft<strong>in</strong>g process, one could plausibly argue, entails that the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
product and the framework it creates is as much a product <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />
contribution as it is <strong>of</strong> the other state parties that participated <strong>in</strong> the<br />
draft<strong>in</strong>g. A fact <strong>of</strong>ten glossed over is that <strong>Africa</strong> is also well represented <strong>in</strong><br />
the Court’s hierarchy and by implication, <strong>in</strong> its operations. 22 It is thus<br />
rather erroneous to quickly dismiss the ICC as a Western tool established<br />
for imperialistic purposes. Additionally, the widespread ratifications <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Statute by <strong>Africa</strong>n countries must signify, at the very least, <strong>Africa</strong>’s<br />
‘endorsement’ <strong>of</strong> the ICC and the processes that it stands for. 23<br />
Perhaps the most high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile manifestation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n countries’<br />
unease with the work <strong>of</strong> the ICC was the adoption by the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union<br />
<strong>of</strong> a decision whereby members <strong>of</strong> the AU were urged not to co-operate<br />
17 J Dugard ‘<strong>Africa</strong> and <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al law: Progress or marg<strong>in</strong>alization?’ (2000)<br />
94 American Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Law Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 229 230.<br />
18 AMICC ‘<strong>Africa</strong> and the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court’ http://www.amicc.org/docs/<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>%20and%20the%20ICC.pdf (accessed 16 March 2010).<br />
19<br />
BC Olugbuo ‘Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>: An analysis <strong>of</strong> the South<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n legislation’ (2004) 1 (1) Eyes on the ICC 219 220.<br />
20 Coalition for the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court (n 14 above).<br />
21<br />
As above.<br />
22 Five <strong>of</strong> the Court’s current judges are <strong>Africa</strong>n: Fatoumata Dembele Diarra (Mali);<br />
Akua Kuenyehia (Ghana); Daniel David Ntanda Nsereko (Uganda); Joyce Aluoch<br />
(Kenya); and Sanji Mmasenono Monogeng (Botswana).There are also several <strong>Africa</strong>ns<br />
that occupy high-level positions at the Court, for example, Deputy Prosecutor Fatou<br />
Bensouda (The Gambia), Deputy Registrar Didier Preira (Senegal).<br />
23<br />
Concededly, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> treaty signature and ratifications <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> are pretty<br />
complex. It is a fact that <strong>Africa</strong>n states <strong>in</strong>variably lead <strong>in</strong> the sign<strong>in</strong>g and ratification <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational treaties while their compliance with most <strong>of</strong> the treaties is <strong>of</strong>ten abysmal.<br />
The reasons for the lack <strong>of</strong> compliance are multifarious but do not necessarily stem<br />
from a lack <strong>of</strong> will to comply with the treaty obligations. Some states simply do not<br />
have the resources and expertise to ensure compliance with the treaties. See C Od<strong>in</strong>kalu<br />
‘Back to the future: The imperative <strong>of</strong> prioritis<strong>in</strong>g for the protection <strong>of</strong> human rights <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Africa</strong>’ (2003) 47 Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Law 1 24.