24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sentenc<strong>in</strong>g practice <strong>of</strong> the Special Court for Sierra Leone 123<br />

limitations. 25 This is notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g that the operation <strong>of</strong> retribution <strong>in</strong><br />

the ancient world resulted <strong>in</strong> harsh and <strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ate punishment without<br />

regard to the particularities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fender and his crime. 26<br />

By contrast, utilitarians hold the view that any punishment should<br />

achieve some purpose and that punishment is generally a bad th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

because it causes unhapp<strong>in</strong>ess to the <strong>of</strong>fender. 27 The orig<strong>in</strong>ators <strong>of</strong><br />

utilitarian penology were Cesare Beccaria, Jeremy Bentham and John<br />

Stuart Mill, who derived their conception <strong>of</strong> utilitarianism from Baron<br />

Helvetius. 28 Utilitarian penology has been identified as a system based on<br />

utility. 29 This means that it gauges the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the sentence by<br />

reference to social costs <strong>of</strong> wrongful conduct and the social costs necessary<br />

to prevent it. 30 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the utilitarian theory, if there are several<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> punishment which produce the same good consequences, society<br />

must opt for the one which is the least pleasant to the <strong>of</strong>fender 31 or one that<br />

will maximise utility. 32 Utilitarians appreciate that it is not possible to have<br />

a crime-free society but they endeavour to <strong>in</strong>flict only as much punishment<br />

as is required to prevent future crimes. 33 Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, laws that spell out<br />

punishment for crim<strong>in</strong>al conduct should be designed to deter future<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al conduct by a particular <strong>in</strong>dividual or society <strong>in</strong> general by way <strong>of</strong><br />

putt<strong>in</strong>g them on notice that future crim<strong>in</strong>al conduct will not go<br />

unpunished. 34<br />

Another utilitarian rationale for punishment is rehabilitation. 35 The<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation is to prevent people from committ<strong>in</strong>g future crimes by<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g them the opportunity and ability to succeed with<strong>in</strong> the conf<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong><br />

the law. 36 Rehabilitation is another utilitarian rationale for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>carceration <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders. From this perspective, some <strong>of</strong> the actions <strong>of</strong><br />

the crim<strong>in</strong>al are as a result <strong>of</strong> a general breakdown <strong>in</strong> the social norms and<br />

laws and to that end proper punishment can address some <strong>of</strong> those<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al tendencies. 37 Many penal reforms are geared towards the<br />

rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders as there is a general belief that some crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

tendencies can be easily corrected through proper punishment. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />

25<br />

26<br />

Cahill (n 22 above).<br />

M Sigler ‘The story <strong>of</strong> justice: Retribution, mercy, and the role <strong>of</strong> emotions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

27<br />

28<br />

capital sentenc<strong>in</strong>g process’ (2000) 19 Law and Philosophy 339.<br />

Bagaric (n 13 above) 102.<br />

G B<strong>in</strong>der ‘Punishment theory: Moral or political?’ (2002) 5 Buffalo Crim<strong>in</strong>al Law Review<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

333.<br />

As above.<br />

B<strong>in</strong>der (n 28 above).<br />

Bagaric (n 13 above) 103.<br />

B<strong>in</strong>der (n 28 above) 323.<br />

http://law.jrank.org/pages/9576/Punishment-THEORIES-PUNISHMENT.html<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

(accessed 14 April 2010).<br />

As above.<br />

Kumari (n 11 above) 1.<br />

http://law.jrank.org/pages/9576/Punishment-THEORIES-PUNISHMENT.html<br />

37<br />

(accessed 14 April 2010).<br />

As above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!