24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 Chapter 13<br />

Constitution, 62 this recourse cannot resolve the glar<strong>in</strong>g lacunae that we<br />

have just po<strong>in</strong>ted out.<br />

4.1.2 The law on <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities<br />

Official immunities generally provide for exemptions from <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

and prosecution over conduct that would otherwise render one liable to<br />

prosecution and <strong>in</strong>vestigation. These immunities will <strong>of</strong>ten arise as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> a person’s position at the time <strong>of</strong> the commission <strong>of</strong> the alleged <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> head <strong>of</strong> state and most diplomatic and consular positions<br />

accord vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> immunity from prosecution and <strong>in</strong>vestigation to<br />

their holders. The Rome Statute, however, presents a radical departure<br />

from the ‘traditional’ position on immunities. In as far as <strong>of</strong>fences under<br />

the Rome Statute are concerned, immunities have been rendered<br />

obsolete. 63 The effect is that one cannot raise <strong>of</strong>ficial immunity as a bar to<br />

an <strong>in</strong>vestigation or prosecution by the Court.<br />

Article 27 <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute – which bars <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities – has<br />

very serious implications for many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, especially those that<br />

have constitutional provisions guarantee<strong>in</strong>g immunity to their heads <strong>of</strong><br />

state. This apparent tension between municipal constitutions’ provisions<br />

on immunity and the Rome Statute, however, has also been the subject <strong>of</strong><br />

serious discussion among some European state parties to the Statute. 64 It<br />

is notable that, he irrelevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial capacity as provided <strong>in</strong> article 27<br />

has been declared to be <strong>in</strong>compatible with the domestic constitutions <strong>of</strong>,<br />

for example, Belgium, 65 France 66 and Luxembourg. 67 In spite <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tensions that article 27 supposedly generates it is clear that all state parties<br />

to the Statute are under an obligation to realign their domestic provisions<br />

to give effect to article 27. As will be demonstrated below, the evolv<strong>in</strong>g law<br />

on <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities actually supports a limited version <strong>of</strong> immunity<br />

which fundamentally differs from the provisions <strong>in</strong> most domestic laws.<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g regard to provisions <strong>in</strong> Malawi’s laws that provide for<br />

immunity, it will be important to properly reconcile the Rome Statute’s<br />

position on immunity with local law dur<strong>in</strong>g the domestication process. For<br />

example, under section 91(2) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Malawi, President<br />

cannot be charged with any crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>of</strong>fence dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsistence <strong>of</strong> his/<br />

62<br />

63<br />

64<br />

Sec 11(2)(c) Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Malawi.<br />

Art 27 Rome Statute.<br />

For a fuller discussion <strong>of</strong> the positions <strong>of</strong> some European countries with respect to art<br />

65<br />

27 <strong>of</strong> the Statute, see BC Olugbuo (n 44 above) 21-22 & 27-30.<br />

See Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> State <strong>of</strong> 21 April 1999 on a legislative proposal approv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Rome Statute on the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court Parliamentary Document 2-239<br />

66<br />

(1999/2000) 94.<br />

See Decision 98-408 DC <strong>of</strong> 22 January 1999 (Treaty on the Statute <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong><br />

67<br />

Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court) Journal <strong>of</strong>ficiel 24 January 1999 1317.<br />

See Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> State on the draft laws concern<strong>in</strong>g the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rome Statute on the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court 4 May 1999, 44.088.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!