Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
290 Chapter 13<br />
Constitution, 62 this recourse cannot resolve the glar<strong>in</strong>g lacunae that we<br />
have just po<strong>in</strong>ted out.<br />
4.1.2 The law on <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities<br />
Official immunities generally provide for exemptions from <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
and prosecution over conduct that would otherwise render one liable to<br />
prosecution and <strong>in</strong>vestigation. These immunities will <strong>of</strong>ten arise as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> a person’s position at the time <strong>of</strong> the commission <strong>of</strong> the alleged <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> head <strong>of</strong> state and most diplomatic and consular positions<br />
accord vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> immunity from prosecution and <strong>in</strong>vestigation to<br />
their holders. The Rome Statute, however, presents a radical departure<br />
from the ‘traditional’ position on immunities. In as far as <strong>of</strong>fences under<br />
the Rome Statute are concerned, immunities have been rendered<br />
obsolete. 63 The effect is that one cannot raise <strong>of</strong>ficial immunity as a bar to<br />
an <strong>in</strong>vestigation or prosecution by the Court.<br />
Article 27 <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute – which bars <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities – has<br />
very serious implications for many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, especially those that<br />
have constitutional provisions guarantee<strong>in</strong>g immunity to their heads <strong>of</strong><br />
state. This apparent tension between municipal constitutions’ provisions<br />
on immunity and the Rome Statute, however, has also been the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
serious discussion among some European state parties to the Statute. 64 It<br />
is notable that, he irrelevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial capacity as provided <strong>in</strong> article 27<br />
has been declared to be <strong>in</strong>compatible with the domestic constitutions <strong>of</strong>,<br />
for example, Belgium, 65 France 66 and Luxembourg. 67 In spite <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tensions that article 27 supposedly generates it is clear that all state parties<br />
to the Statute are under an obligation to realign their domestic provisions<br />
to give effect to article 27. As will be demonstrated below, the evolv<strong>in</strong>g law<br />
on <strong>of</strong>ficial immunities actually supports a limited version <strong>of</strong> immunity<br />
which fundamentally differs from the provisions <strong>in</strong> most domestic laws.<br />
Hav<strong>in</strong>g regard to provisions <strong>in</strong> Malawi’s laws that provide for<br />
immunity, it will be important to properly reconcile the Rome Statute’s<br />
position on immunity with local law dur<strong>in</strong>g the domestication process. For<br />
example, under section 91(2) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Malawi, President<br />
cannot be charged with any crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>of</strong>fence dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsistence <strong>of</strong> his/<br />
62<br />
63<br />
64<br />
Sec 11(2)(c) Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Malawi.<br />
Art 27 Rome Statute.<br />
For a fuller discussion <strong>of</strong> the positions <strong>of</strong> some European countries with respect to art<br />
65<br />
27 <strong>of</strong> the Statute, see BC Olugbuo (n 44 above) 21-22 & 27-30.<br />
See Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> State <strong>of</strong> 21 April 1999 on a legislative proposal approv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the Rome Statute on the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court Parliamentary Document 2-239<br />
66<br />
(1999/2000) 94.<br />
See Decision 98-408 DC <strong>of</strong> 22 January 1999 (Treaty on the Statute <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong><br />
67<br />
Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court) Journal <strong>of</strong>ficiel 24 January 1999 1317.<br />
See Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> State on the draft laws concern<strong>in</strong>g the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Rome Statute on the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court 4 May 1999, 44.088.