24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 Chapter 2<br />

Tribunal 38 which was established by the Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong><br />

Military Tribunal, annexed to the London Agreement signed on 8 August<br />

1945. 39 The Charter outlawed state <strong>of</strong>ficials’ defence <strong>of</strong> immunity for<br />

crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st peace (aggression), crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity and war<br />

crimes. 40 Therefore, the immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials has been rejected at<br />

least s<strong>in</strong>ce the Nuremberg Trials. 41 Nevertheless, Adolf Hitler and Benito<br />

Mussol<strong>in</strong>i were never <strong>in</strong>dicted.<br />

The Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal was followed by the<br />

Allied Control Council Law 10 on the Punishment <strong>of</strong> Persons Guilty <strong>of</strong><br />

War <strong>Crimes</strong>, <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st Peace and Aga<strong>in</strong>st Humanity, 42 which<br />

rejected the defence <strong>of</strong> immunity attach<strong>in</strong>g to state <strong>of</strong>ficials. 43 The<br />

Proclamation by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers issued on<br />

19 January 1946 at Tokyo further called for the establishment <strong>of</strong> an<br />

<strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal for the Far East. 44 The Tribunal was<br />

established by the Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal for the<br />

Far East (the Tokyo Charter) <strong>in</strong> 1946. 45 The Tokyo Charter outlawed the<br />

defence <strong>of</strong> immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes. 46<br />

Subsequent to World War II, <strong>in</strong>ternational law on the doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials developed further. Different <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

conventions, pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and statutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al tribunals and<br />

courts rejected the defence <strong>of</strong> immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials before<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational courts and tribunals. In fact, <strong>in</strong>ternational law (both<br />

conventional and customary <strong>in</strong>ternational law) outlaws the defence <strong>of</strong><br />

immunity <strong>of</strong> a head <strong>of</strong> state <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes. 47 In all these<br />

38<br />

MP Scharf Balkan justice: The story beh<strong>in</strong>d the first <strong>in</strong>ternational war crimes trial s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Nuremberg (1997) 9-11. On the disposition and outcome <strong>of</strong> the Nuremberg Trials, see E<br />

de Aragao (n 38 above) 16; MC Bassiouni <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational law<br />

(1992) 586-589.<br />

39 Art 1 Agreement by the Government <strong>of</strong> the United States <strong>of</strong> America, the Provisional<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the French Republic, the Government <strong>of</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Great<br />

Brita<strong>in</strong> and Northern Ireland and the Government <strong>of</strong> the Union <strong>of</strong> Soviet Socialist<br />

Republics for the Prosecution and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Major War Crim<strong>in</strong>als <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European Axis.<br />

40 Art 7 Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal, 1945.<br />

41 K Kittichaisaree <strong>International</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law (2001) 259.<br />

42<br />

Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the Control Council for Germany Berl<strong>in</strong>, 31 January 1946.<br />

43 Arts II (4)(a) & (5) Allied Control Council Law 10 on the Punishment <strong>of</strong> Persons<br />

Guilty <strong>of</strong> War <strong>Crimes</strong>, <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st Peace and Aga<strong>in</strong>st Humanity.<br />

44<br />

Art 1 Proclamation by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, Tokyo, 19<br />

January 1946. The proclamation was ordered and signed by Douglas MacArthur (the<br />

Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers).<br />

45<br />

On the Tokyo Tribunal, see U Kei Beyond the judgment <strong>of</strong> civilization: The <strong>in</strong>tellectual legacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Japanese war crimes trials 1946-1949 (2003) 1-336; C Hosoya et al The Tokyo war<br />

crimes trial (1986) 1-226.<br />

46<br />

Art 6 Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946.<br />

47<br />

See, generally, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple III Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Law Recognized <strong>in</strong> the Charter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Nuremberg Tribunal and <strong>in</strong> the Judgment <strong>of</strong> the Tribunal, 1950 (1950) 82<br />

Yearbook <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Law Commission 374-378; Report <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Law<br />

Commission Cover<strong>in</strong>g its Second Session 5 June-29 July 1950 Doc A/1316 11-14; art 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!