24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 Chapter 12<br />

Apartheid, 20 and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide. 21<br />

The current provision <strong>of</strong> the complementarity pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong> the Rome<br />

Statute has its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the 1994 <strong>International</strong> Law Commission (ILC)<br />

Draft Statute, 22 generally seen as the cornerstone for the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the notion <strong>of</strong> complementarity as currently provided <strong>in</strong> the Rome<br />

Statute. 23 The 1994 ILC Draft provides <strong>in</strong> its preamble that the ‘[ICC] is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended to be complementary to national crim<strong>in</strong>al justice systems <strong>in</strong> cases<br />

where such trial procedures may not be available or may be <strong>in</strong>effective’. 24<br />

The ILC Draft also proposed circumstances under which an ICC<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation or prosecution may be <strong>in</strong>admissible. 25 The complementarity<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple went through several changes dur<strong>in</strong>g the Preparatory Committee<br />

(PrepCom) meet<strong>in</strong>gs convened by the UN. 26 However, some <strong>of</strong> the thorny<br />

issues surround<strong>in</strong>g the complementarity pr<strong>in</strong>ciple were agreed upon before<br />

the Rome Conference. For example, states were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> the<br />

relationship between the proposed court and national courts and were<br />

hesitant to accept any compromise proposal without know<strong>in</strong>g the legal<br />

relationship between the two. 27 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to John Holmes, ‘[t]he<br />

uniqueness <strong>of</strong> the legislative history concern<strong>in</strong>g the complementarity<br />

regime is that most <strong>of</strong> the issues were largely resolved <strong>in</strong> the Preparatory<br />

Committee prior to the Rome Conference’. 28 This shows that states were<br />

actually <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> how the ICC would affect their sovereignty and also<br />

20 Art 4(b) <strong>International</strong> Convention on the Suppression and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong><br />

Apartheid UN Doc A/9030 (1974) entered <strong>in</strong>to force on 18 July 1976. The Apartheid<br />

Convention was adopted by the General Assembly on 30 November 1973, by 91 votes<br />

<strong>in</strong> favour, four aga<strong>in</strong>st (Portugal, South <strong>Africa</strong>, the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom and the United<br />

States) and 26 abstentions. It came <strong>in</strong>to force on 18 July 1976. It has been ratified by<br />

107 states; J Dugard ‘Convention on the Suppression and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong><br />

Apartheid’ http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/pdf/ha/cspca/cspca_e.pdf (accessed 15<br />

September 2010).<br />

21 Arts 5 and 6 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide,<br />

entered <strong>in</strong>to force on 12 January 1951.<br />

22 The Draft Statute for an <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court was adopted by the ILC at its<br />

forty-sixth session <strong>in</strong> 1994, and was submitted to the General Assembly as a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ILC’s Report cover<strong>in</strong>g the work <strong>of</strong> that session (1994 ILC Draft).<br />

23 M El-Zeidy The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> complementarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al law: Orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />

development and practice (2008) 126.<br />

24 Para 3 1994 ILC Draft.<br />

25 Art 35 1994 ILC Draft provides that ‘[t]he Court may, on application by the accused or<br />

at the request <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terested State at any time prior to the commencement <strong>of</strong> the trial,<br />

or <strong>of</strong> its own motion, decide, hav<strong>in</strong>g regard to the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Statute set out <strong>in</strong> the<br />

preamble, that a case before it is <strong>in</strong>admissible on the ground that the crime <strong>in</strong> question:<br />

(a) Has been duly <strong>in</strong>vestigated by a State with jurisdiction over it, and the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> that State not to proceed to a prosecution is apparently wellfounded;<br />

(b) Is under <strong>in</strong>vestigation by a State which has or may have jurisdiction over it,<br />

and there is no reason for the Court to take any further action for the time<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g with respect to the crime; or<br />

(c) Is not <strong>of</strong> such gravity to justify further action by the Court.’<br />

26 The ad hoc Committee that drafted the ILC Draft <strong>in</strong> 1994 was replaced by the<br />

Preparatory Committee <strong>in</strong> 1996.<br />

27 El-Zeidy (n 23 above) 127.<br />

28 J Holmes ‘Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> complementarity’ <strong>in</strong> Lee (n 1 above) 43.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!