24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials and prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes 35<br />

‘immunity’ is termed ‘k<strong>in</strong>ga dhidi ya mashtaka,’ 7 which refers to ‘immunity<br />

from prosecution’. In other words, immunity means exception, resistance,<br />

exemption, protection or <strong>in</strong>vulnerability. It may also mean any exemption<br />

from a duty, liability or service <strong>of</strong> process; especially such an exemption<br />

granted to a public <strong>of</strong>ficial. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Concise Law Dictionary,<br />

immunity is a<br />

personal favour granted by law contrary to the general rule. An immunity is a<br />

right peculiar to some <strong>in</strong>dividual or body; an exemption from some general<br />

duty or burden; a personal benefit or favour granted by law contrary to the<br />

general rule. Freedom from liability; exemption conferred by any law, from a<br />

general rule ... [It can also mean] freedom or exemptions from penalty,<br />

burden or duty. 8<br />

Thus, ‘immunity from prosecution’ means withdrawal from prosecution.<br />

Immunity may be exercised at any time <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> the trial, but before<br />

judgment is delivered. 9 Hence, it means an exception or a bar to<br />

prosecution for crimes. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Schabas, immunity is ‘a defence’ 10<br />

under <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al law. This op<strong>in</strong>ion is also shared by Van<br />

Schaack and Slye. 11 It therefore constitutes a defence to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility for <strong>in</strong>dividuals accused <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes.<br />

Whether this defence <strong>of</strong> immunity is enforceable under <strong>in</strong>ternational law<br />

is a contentious subject. However, it suffices at this early po<strong>in</strong>t to regard it<br />

as a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> defence or ground that is commonly raised by state <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

when subjected to <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Immunity may also be characterised as a barrier to <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

accountability. 12 It is a ground that excludes the crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />

an <strong>in</strong>dividual. It ‘has the effect <strong>of</strong> render<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>admissible any action<br />

brought aga<strong>in</strong>st the person who <strong>in</strong>vokes it’. 13<br />

After this attempt to clarify the terms ‘immunity’ and ‘state <strong>of</strong>ficials’,<br />

then we next exam<strong>in</strong>e developments regard<strong>in</strong>g the immunity <strong>of</strong> state<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials under <strong>in</strong>ternational law.<br />

7 See art 46 Constitution <strong>of</strong> the United Republic <strong>of</strong> Tanzania, 1977 (<strong>of</strong>ficial version <strong>in</strong><br />

Kiswahili (2005)).<br />

8<br />

PR Aiyar Concise Law Dictionary: With legal maxims, Lat<strong>in</strong> terms and words and phrases<br />

(2005) 549-550; Jashir S<strong>in</strong>gh v Vip<strong>in</strong> Kumar Jaggi AIR 2001 SC 2734.<br />

9 Aiyar (as above).<br />

10<br />

WA Schabas An <strong>in</strong>troduction to the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court (2007) 231.<br />

11 B van Schaack and RC Slye <strong>International</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law and its enforcement: Cases and<br />

materials (2007) 865-874.<br />

12<br />

DP Stewart ‘Immunity and accountability: More cont<strong>in</strong>uity than change?’(2005) 99<br />

American Society <strong>International</strong> Law Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 227 228.<br />

13 See Dissent<strong>in</strong>g Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Judge Jean Yves De Cara <strong>in</strong> the Case Concern<strong>in</strong>g Certa<strong>in</strong><br />

Crim<strong>in</strong>al Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> France (Republic <strong>of</strong> the Congo v France) Provisional Measures Order <strong>of</strong><br />

17 June 2003, ICJ Reports (2003) 102, 122.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!