Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials and prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes 35<br />
‘immunity’ is termed ‘k<strong>in</strong>ga dhidi ya mashtaka,’ 7 which refers to ‘immunity<br />
from prosecution’. In other words, immunity means exception, resistance,<br />
exemption, protection or <strong>in</strong>vulnerability. It may also mean any exemption<br />
from a duty, liability or service <strong>of</strong> process; especially such an exemption<br />
granted to a public <strong>of</strong>ficial. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Concise Law Dictionary,<br />
immunity is a<br />
personal favour granted by law contrary to the general rule. An immunity is a<br />
right peculiar to some <strong>in</strong>dividual or body; an exemption from some general<br />
duty or burden; a personal benefit or favour granted by law contrary to the<br />
general rule. Freedom from liability; exemption conferred by any law, from a<br />
general rule ... [It can also mean] freedom or exemptions from penalty,<br />
burden or duty. 8<br />
Thus, ‘immunity from prosecution’ means withdrawal from prosecution.<br />
Immunity may be exercised at any time <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> the trial, but before<br />
judgment is delivered. 9 Hence, it means an exception or a bar to<br />
prosecution for crimes. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Schabas, immunity is ‘a defence’ 10<br />
under <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al law. This op<strong>in</strong>ion is also shared by Van<br />
Schaack and Slye. 11 It therefore constitutes a defence to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility for <strong>in</strong>dividuals accused <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes.<br />
Whether this defence <strong>of</strong> immunity is enforceable under <strong>in</strong>ternational law<br />
is a contentious subject. However, it suffices at this early po<strong>in</strong>t to regard it<br />
as a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> defence or ground that is commonly raised by state <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
when subjected to <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Immunity may also be characterised as a barrier to <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
accountability. 12 It is a ground that excludes the crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />
an <strong>in</strong>dividual. It ‘has the effect <strong>of</strong> render<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>admissible any action<br />
brought aga<strong>in</strong>st the person who <strong>in</strong>vokes it’. 13<br />
After this attempt to clarify the terms ‘immunity’ and ‘state <strong>of</strong>ficials’,<br />
then we next exam<strong>in</strong>e developments regard<strong>in</strong>g the immunity <strong>of</strong> state<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials under <strong>in</strong>ternational law.<br />
7 See art 46 Constitution <strong>of</strong> the United Republic <strong>of</strong> Tanzania, 1977 (<strong>of</strong>ficial version <strong>in</strong><br />
Kiswahili (2005)).<br />
8<br />
PR Aiyar Concise Law Dictionary: With legal maxims, Lat<strong>in</strong> terms and words and phrases<br />
(2005) 549-550; Jashir S<strong>in</strong>gh v Vip<strong>in</strong> Kumar Jaggi AIR 2001 SC 2734.<br />
9 Aiyar (as above).<br />
10<br />
WA Schabas An <strong>in</strong>troduction to the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court (2007) 231.<br />
11 B van Schaack and RC Slye <strong>International</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law and its enforcement: Cases and<br />
materials (2007) 865-874.<br />
12<br />
DP Stewart ‘Immunity and accountability: More cont<strong>in</strong>uity than change?’(2005) 99<br />
American Society <strong>International</strong> Law Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 227 228.<br />
13 See Dissent<strong>in</strong>g Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Judge Jean Yves De Cara <strong>in</strong> the Case Concern<strong>in</strong>g Certa<strong>in</strong><br />
Crim<strong>in</strong>al Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> France (Republic <strong>of</strong> the Congo v France) Provisional Measures Order <strong>of</strong><br />
17 June 2003, ICJ Reports (2003) 102, 122.