24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

288 Chapter 13<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences. Procedurally, the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and Evidence Code 54<br />

provides for the manner <strong>in</strong> which all crim<strong>in</strong>al trials <strong>in</strong> Malawi must be<br />

conducted. 55 What is immediately clear is that the regime <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law<br />

<strong>in</strong> Malawi, like that <strong>of</strong> most countries, is territorial <strong>in</strong> nature. In essence,<br />

the crim<strong>in</strong>al law <strong>of</strong> Malawi only regulates conduct that has been<br />

committed <strong>in</strong> Malawi. Additionally, however, the crim<strong>in</strong>al law <strong>of</strong> Malawi<br />

also regulates conduct that has been committed partly with<strong>in</strong> Malawi and<br />

partly outside Malawi where the perpetrator <strong>of</strong> the conduct happens to be<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction. 56<br />

Ideally, therefore, Malawian courts can try crimes under the Rome<br />

Statute should the perpetrator be found <strong>in</strong> Malawi and where it is proved<br />

that the <strong>of</strong>fence was committed <strong>in</strong> Malawi or partly <strong>in</strong> Malawi and partly<br />

outside Malawi. The preced<strong>in</strong>g, however, presumes that the <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Rome Statute are already recognised and legislated for under Malawian<br />

law. The actual situation, however, reveals a mixed and somewhat<br />

confused picture. Genocide, crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity and war crimes are<br />

not specifically dealt with <strong>in</strong> any Malawian statute. 57 Concededly, the<br />

Constitution does state <strong>in</strong> section 17 that ‘acts <strong>of</strong> genocide are prohibited<br />

and shall be prevented and punished’. S<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution, however, no legislation has been adopted to provide further<br />

detail to section 17 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. 58 Section 17 thus rema<strong>in</strong>s a mere<br />

exhortatory statement with regard to Malawi’s position on genocide. This<br />

means that while the prohibition <strong>of</strong> genocide is recognised <strong>in</strong> Malawian<br />

law there is no framework for deal<strong>in</strong>g with any conduct that may be<br />

54 Ch 8:01 Laws <strong>of</strong> Malawi.<br />

55 All <strong>of</strong>fences must be tried <strong>in</strong> accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure<br />

and Evidence Code except where a statute exists and provides for a different procedure<br />

– sec 6 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and Evidence Code.<br />

56 Sec 5 Penal Code: ‘When an act which, if wholly done with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

court, would be an <strong>of</strong>fence aga<strong>in</strong>st this code, is done partly with<strong>in</strong> and partly beyond<br />

the jurisdiction, every person who with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction does or makes any part <strong>of</strong><br />

such act may be tried and punished under this code <strong>in</strong> the same manner as if such act<br />

had been done wholly with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction.’ Sec 66 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and<br />

Evidence Code: ‘Every court has authority to cause to be brought before it any person<br />

who is <strong>in</strong> Malawi and is charged with an <strong>of</strong>fence committed with<strong>in</strong> Malawi or partly<br />

with<strong>in</strong> and partly beyond Malawi or which accord<strong>in</strong>g to law may be dealt with by it and<br />

to deal with the accused accord<strong>in</strong>g to its jurisdiction.’<br />

57 Admittedly, Malawi is a party to the Geneva Conventions <strong>of</strong> 1949 but this is clearly not<br />

enough for deal<strong>in</strong>g with the crimes under the Rome Statute – see Geneva Conventions<br />

Act Ch 12:03 Laws <strong>of</strong> Malawi. Under sec 4(1) <strong>of</strong> the Geneva Conventions Act<br />

Malawian courts may exercise universal jurisdiction over grave breaches <strong>of</strong> the Geneva<br />

Conventions but <strong>in</strong> practice no Malawian court has ever <strong>in</strong>voked this provisions – FE<br />

Kanyongolo Malawi: Justice sector and the rule <strong>of</strong> law (A review by AfriMAP and Open<br />

Society Initiative for Southern <strong>Africa</strong>) (2006) 33.<br />

58 Constitutions normally provide <strong>in</strong> very general and broad terms. It is left to legislatures<br />

to pass specific legislation that gives full mean<strong>in</strong>g to the provisions <strong>in</strong> a constitution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!