Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
288 Chapter 13<br />
<strong>of</strong>fences. Procedurally, the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and Evidence Code 54<br />
provides for the manner <strong>in</strong> which all crim<strong>in</strong>al trials <strong>in</strong> Malawi must be<br />
conducted. 55 What is immediately clear is that the regime <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law<br />
<strong>in</strong> Malawi, like that <strong>of</strong> most countries, is territorial <strong>in</strong> nature. In essence,<br />
the crim<strong>in</strong>al law <strong>of</strong> Malawi only regulates conduct that has been<br />
committed <strong>in</strong> Malawi. Additionally, however, the crim<strong>in</strong>al law <strong>of</strong> Malawi<br />
also regulates conduct that has been committed partly with<strong>in</strong> Malawi and<br />
partly outside Malawi where the perpetrator <strong>of</strong> the conduct happens to be<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction. 56<br />
Ideally, therefore, Malawian courts can try crimes under the Rome<br />
Statute should the perpetrator be found <strong>in</strong> Malawi and where it is proved<br />
that the <strong>of</strong>fence was committed <strong>in</strong> Malawi or partly <strong>in</strong> Malawi and partly<br />
outside Malawi. The preced<strong>in</strong>g, however, presumes that the <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Rome Statute are already recognised and legislated for under Malawian<br />
law. The actual situation, however, reveals a mixed and somewhat<br />
confused picture. Genocide, crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity and war crimes are<br />
not specifically dealt with <strong>in</strong> any Malawian statute. 57 Concededly, the<br />
Constitution does state <strong>in</strong> section 17 that ‘acts <strong>of</strong> genocide are prohibited<br />
and shall be prevented and punished’. S<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Constitution, however, no legislation has been adopted to provide further<br />
detail to section 17 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. 58 Section 17 thus rema<strong>in</strong>s a mere<br />
exhortatory statement with regard to Malawi’s position on genocide. This<br />
means that while the prohibition <strong>of</strong> genocide is recognised <strong>in</strong> Malawian<br />
law there is no framework for deal<strong>in</strong>g with any conduct that may be<br />
54 Ch 8:01 Laws <strong>of</strong> Malawi.<br />
55 All <strong>of</strong>fences must be tried <strong>in</strong> accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure<br />
and Evidence Code except where a statute exists and provides for a different procedure<br />
– sec 6 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and Evidence Code.<br />
56 Sec 5 Penal Code: ‘When an act which, if wholly done with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
court, would be an <strong>of</strong>fence aga<strong>in</strong>st this code, is done partly with<strong>in</strong> and partly beyond<br />
the jurisdiction, every person who with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction does or makes any part <strong>of</strong><br />
such act may be tried and punished under this code <strong>in</strong> the same manner as if such act<br />
had been done wholly with<strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction.’ Sec 66 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure and<br />
Evidence Code: ‘Every court has authority to cause to be brought before it any person<br />
who is <strong>in</strong> Malawi and is charged with an <strong>of</strong>fence committed with<strong>in</strong> Malawi or partly<br />
with<strong>in</strong> and partly beyond Malawi or which accord<strong>in</strong>g to law may be dealt with by it and<br />
to deal with the accused accord<strong>in</strong>g to its jurisdiction.’<br />
57 Admittedly, Malawi is a party to the Geneva Conventions <strong>of</strong> 1949 but this is clearly not<br />
enough for deal<strong>in</strong>g with the crimes under the Rome Statute – see Geneva Conventions<br />
Act Ch 12:03 Laws <strong>of</strong> Malawi. Under sec 4(1) <strong>of</strong> the Geneva Conventions Act<br />
Malawian courts may exercise universal jurisdiction over grave breaches <strong>of</strong> the Geneva<br />
Conventions but <strong>in</strong> practice no Malawian court has ever <strong>in</strong>voked this provisions – FE<br />
Kanyongolo Malawi: Justice sector and the rule <strong>of</strong> law (A review by AfriMAP and Open<br />
Society Initiative for Southern <strong>Africa</strong>) (2006) 33.<br />
58 Constitutions normally provide <strong>in</strong> very general and broad terms. It is left to legislatures<br />
to pass specific legislation that gives full mean<strong>in</strong>g to the provisions <strong>in</strong> a constitution.