Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
64 Chapter 3<br />
evidentiary areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al justice, with particular focus on<br />
those where the ICTR has pioneered the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational law,<br />
break<strong>in</strong>g new grounds and mov<strong>in</strong>g the law forward. Further, the chapter<br />
addresses <strong>in</strong>stances where the ICTR has <strong>of</strong>fered important clarification or<br />
elaboration <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g jurisprudence, or applied it to novel or challeng<strong>in</strong>g<br />
factual circumstances.<br />
2 Genocide: Group victims, physical and mental<br />
elements<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption <strong>of</strong> the ground-break<strong>in</strong>g and first b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g United<br />
Nation’s (UN) <strong>in</strong>ternational human rights and penal treaty, the<br />
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide<br />
(Genocide Convention) <strong>of</strong> 1948, 3 no <strong>in</strong>ternational tribunal envisaged by<br />
the Genocide Convention was established. The crime <strong>of</strong> genocide and<br />
other acts <strong>of</strong> genocide which the Convention proscribes were neither<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpreted nor applied until the ICTR <strong>in</strong> 1998 adjudicated and issued<br />
judgments <strong>in</strong> the Akayesu and Kambanda cases. As generally predicted <strong>in</strong><br />
academic and other efforts, for <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> the 1989 proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />
renowned experts <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational law, 4 multiple difficulties would<br />
confront the <strong>in</strong>terpretation and application <strong>of</strong> the Genocide Convention.<br />
In pioneer<strong>in</strong>g the adjudication, and be<strong>in</strong>g the first <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
tribunal to f<strong>in</strong>d an accused guilty <strong>of</strong> genocide, the ICTR confronted and<br />
addressed multiple issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to the group-victims <strong>of</strong> genocide (groups<br />
protected by the Genocide Convention) and the physical and mental<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> the crime <strong>of</strong> genocide.<br />
Under article 2 <strong>of</strong> the ICTR’s Statute, which is a verbatim<br />
reproduction <strong>of</strong> article 2 <strong>of</strong> the Genocide Convention (and is also similar<br />
to the provisions <strong>of</strong> articles 4 and 6 and <strong>of</strong> the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the ICTY and the<br />
<strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court (ICC) respectively), certa<strong>in</strong> enumerated acts<br />
(actus reus) 5 constitute genocide if committed with the <strong>in</strong>tent to destroy <strong>in</strong><br />
whole or <strong>in</strong> part a racial, national, ethnical or religious group as such. The<br />
identified groups are the groups that the prevention, prosecution and<br />
punishment <strong>of</strong> the crime <strong>of</strong> genocide are <strong>in</strong>tended to protect – also called<br />
the ‘group victims <strong>of</strong> genocide’. The ICTR Statute, like the Genocide<br />
Convention, and Statutes <strong>of</strong> the ICTY and ICC, does not identify criteria<br />
3 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide, 9 December<br />
1948 and entered <strong>in</strong>to force on 12 January 1951.<br />
4 C Bassiouni ‘Genocide: The convention, domestic laws and state responsibility,<br />
prospects for implementation <strong>of</strong> the Genocide Convention under state laws’ (1989) 83<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Law 314.<br />
5 Namely: kill<strong>in</strong>g members <strong>of</strong> the group; caus<strong>in</strong>g serious bodily or mental harm to<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the group; deliberately <strong>in</strong>flict<strong>in</strong>g on the group conditions <strong>of</strong> life calculated<br />
to br<strong>in</strong>g about the group’s destruction; impos<strong>in</strong>g measures <strong>in</strong>tended to prevent births<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the group; and forcibly transferr<strong>in</strong>g children <strong>of</strong> the group to another group.