Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
148 Chapter 6<br />
2. 1 <strong>Africa</strong>-ICC relationship<br />
From the onset <strong>of</strong> discussions about a permanent <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />
court, <strong>Africa</strong> had a very positive attitude towards the ICC. Indeed, an<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n country, Senegal, was the first <strong>in</strong> the world to ratify the Rome<br />
Statute on 2 February 1999. 7 This is an illustration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s early support<br />
for the idea <strong>of</strong> a permanent <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al court with jurisdiction<br />
over the ‘most serious crimes <strong>of</strong> concern to the <strong>in</strong>ternational community as<br />
a whole’. This support also f<strong>in</strong>ds expression <strong>in</strong> the remarks <strong>of</strong> the then<br />
Organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Unity’s (OAU) representative dur<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>al five<br />
weeks <strong>of</strong> the Rome negotiations. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to OAU’s representative, the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> had a special <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> the ICC<br />
because its people had for centuries endured human rights atrocities such<br />
as slavery, colonial wars and other horrific acts <strong>of</strong> war and violence which<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue today despite the cont<strong>in</strong>ent’s post-colonial phase. 8 In view <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> strong <strong>in</strong>stitutional structures, a court <strong>of</strong> this nature was expected<br />
to supplement the course <strong>of</strong> justice <strong>in</strong> regional and domestic jurisdictions.<br />
Further, vivid memories <strong>of</strong> the Rwandan genocide <strong>of</strong> 1994, <strong>in</strong> which the<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational community was forewarned but failed to act, strengthened<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>’s resolve to support the idea <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dependent and effective<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational penal court that would punish, and hopefully deter,<br />
perpetrators <strong>of</strong> such he<strong>in</strong>ous crimes <strong>in</strong> the future. 9<br />
Naturally, <strong>Africa</strong> went on to play a significant and constructive role <strong>in</strong><br />
the Rome negotiations, ultimately lead<strong>in</strong>g to the creation <strong>of</strong> the Court. 10<br />
The cont<strong>in</strong>ent’s strong back<strong>in</strong>g for the Court has not been limited to state<br />
governments. With many <strong>Africa</strong>n non- governmental organisations<br />
(NGOs) and civil society work<strong>in</strong>g under regimes that are not accountable<br />
or are outright dictatorships that pay little or no heed to basic human rights<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, these two entities made a significant contribution to the<br />
promulgation process. Their contribution was made pr<strong>in</strong>cipally through<br />
domestic advocacy and an <strong>in</strong>ternational organization born <strong>of</strong> such<br />
advocacy, the NGO Coalition for the Establishment <strong>of</strong> an <strong>International</strong><br />
Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court (the Coalition), 11 that comprised activists from <strong>Africa</strong> and<br />
7 UN Doc A/CONF 183.9.<br />
8<br />
T Maluwa, Legal Adviser OAU Secretariat Statement at the 6 th Plenary, 17 June 1998;<br />
Official records <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Diplomatic Conference <strong>of</strong> Plenipotentiaries on<br />
the Establishment <strong>of</strong> an <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court, UN Doc A/CONF 183/13 (Vol<br />
II) 104, 115-118 para 116.<br />
9 Maluwa (as above).<br />
10 H Jallow and F Bensouda ‘<strong>International</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al law <strong>in</strong> an <strong>Africa</strong>n Context’ <strong>in</strong> M Du<br />
Plessis (ed) <strong>Africa</strong>n guide to <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al justice (2008) 41; P Mochochoko ‘<strong>Africa</strong><br />
and the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court’ <strong>in</strong> E Ankumah and E Kwakwa (eds) <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />
perspectives on <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al justice (2005) 15 and S Maqungo ‘The establishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court: SADC’s participation <strong>in</strong> the negotiations’ (2000) 9<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n Security Review 42.<br />
11 R Pace and M Thier<strong>of</strong>f ‘Participation <strong>of</strong> non-governmental organizations’ <strong>in</strong> S Lee (ed)<br />
The <strong>International</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court: The mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Rome Statute – issues, negotiations,<br />
results (1999) 395.