Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials and prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes 53<br />
5 Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />
Currently, there is no regional framework outlaw<strong>in</strong>g the immunity <strong>of</strong> state<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. There is similarly no regional treaty on immunity <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to the prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. However, it<br />
should be known that impunity is prohibited: the Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU) conta<strong>in</strong>s key pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that reject impunity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
Such pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are reflected <strong>in</strong> article 4 <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive Act. Amongst<br />
them is the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that allows the AU to have the right to <strong>in</strong>tervene <strong>in</strong> a<br />
member state pursuant to a decision <strong>of</strong> the Assembly <strong>of</strong> Heads <strong>of</strong> State and<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> the Union <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> grave circumstances, namely: war<br />
crimes, genocide and crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity. 108<br />
Apart from article 4(h) <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive Act, the AU does not have<br />
an express mandate to prosecute <strong>in</strong>dividuals who commit <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, particularly at the regional level. Further, it is difficult to<br />
<strong>in</strong>fer that <strong>in</strong>tervention would <strong>in</strong>clude prosecution <strong>of</strong> perpetrators <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. None <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive<br />
Act <strong>of</strong> the AU rejects immunity, except article 4(o) which rejects impunity<br />
(and by analogy, immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials) for <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes.<br />
Despite the rejection <strong>of</strong> impunity, it is not specifically provided <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the AU whether an <strong>Africa</strong>n state <strong>of</strong>ficial may be<br />
prosecuted for <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes and therefore, <strong>in</strong> grave circumstances<br />
<strong>of</strong> genocide, war crimes and crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity, a state <strong>of</strong>ficial may<br />
not claim immunity from prosecution for such crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. However,<br />
based on customary and conventional <strong>in</strong>ternational law, it may be argued<br />
that such state <strong>of</strong>ficials cannot benefit from immunity for <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
crimes.<br />
Short <strong>of</strong> any regional legal framework on the prosecution <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, one must rely on sub-regional legal<br />
<strong>in</strong>struments. In <strong>Africa</strong>, the only express sub-regional treaty that calls for<br />
prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who commit <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes and rejects<br />
immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials is the Protocol for the Prevention and the<br />
Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide, War <strong>Crimes</strong> and <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
Humanity and all forms <strong>of</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, 109 signed by the <strong>International</strong><br />
Conference on the Great Lakes Region on 29 November 2006. This is a<br />
Protocol to the Pact on Security, Stability and Development <strong>in</strong> the Great<br />
Lakes Region. 110 The Protocol draws from the Genocide Convention and<br />
the Rome Statute and calls for the prosecution and punishment <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> the sub-region. It requires states <strong>in</strong> the sub-region to<br />
108 Art 4(h) Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the AU.<br />
109 Protocol for the Prevention and the Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide, War <strong>Crimes</strong><br />
and <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st Humanity and all forms <strong>of</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, signed by the<br />
<strong>International</strong> Conference on the Great Lakes Region on 29 November 2006.<br />
110 Pact on Security, Stability and Development <strong>in</strong> the Great Lakes Region, <strong>International</strong><br />
Conference on the Great Lakes 2006, signed at Nairobi, Kenya.