24.11.2012 Views

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

Prosecuting International Crimes in Africa - PULP - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials and prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes 53<br />

5 Immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

Currently, there is no regional framework outlaw<strong>in</strong>g the immunity <strong>of</strong> state<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. There is similarly no regional treaty on immunity <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to the prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. However, it<br />

should be known that impunity is prohibited: the Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU) conta<strong>in</strong>s key pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that reject impunity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />

Such pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are reflected <strong>in</strong> article 4 <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive Act. Amongst<br />

them is the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that allows the AU to have the right to <strong>in</strong>tervene <strong>in</strong> a<br />

member state pursuant to a decision <strong>of</strong> the Assembly <strong>of</strong> Heads <strong>of</strong> State and<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the Union <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> grave circumstances, namely: war<br />

crimes, genocide and crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity. 108<br />

Apart from article 4(h) <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive Act, the AU does not have<br />

an express mandate to prosecute <strong>in</strong>dividuals who commit <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, particularly at the regional level. Further, it is difficult to<br />

<strong>in</strong>fer that <strong>in</strong>tervention would <strong>in</strong>clude prosecution <strong>of</strong> perpetrators <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. None <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Constitutive<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> the AU rejects immunity, except article 4(o) which rejects impunity<br />

(and by analogy, immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials) for <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes.<br />

Despite the rejection <strong>of</strong> impunity, it is not specifically provided <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the AU whether an <strong>Africa</strong>n state <strong>of</strong>ficial may be<br />

prosecuted for <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes and therefore, <strong>in</strong> grave circumstances<br />

<strong>of</strong> genocide, war crimes and crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity, a state <strong>of</strong>ficial may<br />

not claim immunity from prosecution for such crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. However,<br />

based on customary and conventional <strong>in</strong>ternational law, it may be argued<br />

that such state <strong>of</strong>ficials cannot benefit from immunity for <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

crimes.<br />

Short <strong>of</strong> any regional legal framework on the prosecution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, one must rely on sub-regional legal<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments. In <strong>Africa</strong>, the only express sub-regional treaty that calls for<br />

prosecution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who commit <strong>in</strong>ternational crimes and rejects<br />

immunity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials is the Protocol for the Prevention and the<br />

Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide, War <strong>Crimes</strong> and <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Humanity and all forms <strong>of</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, 109 signed by the <strong>International</strong><br />

Conference on the Great Lakes Region on 29 November 2006. This is a<br />

Protocol to the Pact on Security, Stability and Development <strong>in</strong> the Great<br />

Lakes Region. 110 The Protocol draws from the Genocide Convention and<br />

the Rome Statute and calls for the prosecution and punishment <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational crimes <strong>in</strong> the sub-region. It requires states <strong>in</strong> the sub-region to<br />

108 Art 4(h) Constitutive Act <strong>of</strong> the AU.<br />

109 Protocol for the Prevention and the Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Genocide, War <strong>Crimes</strong><br />

and <strong>Crimes</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st Humanity and all forms <strong>of</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, signed by the<br />

<strong>International</strong> Conference on the Great Lakes Region on 29 November 2006.<br />

110 Pact on Security, Stability and Development <strong>in</strong> the Great Lakes Region, <strong>International</strong><br />

Conference on the Great Lakes 2006, signed at Nairobi, Kenya.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!