24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III Litigation Pending - By <strong>and</strong>/or Against the Promoters<br />

By the Promoters<br />

A) Pending Arbitration Proceedings<br />

There are none<br />

B) Litigation Pending – FEMA<br />

C)<br />

237<br />

Group <strong>and</strong> the C.L. Group to<br />

attempt arriving at a global<br />

settlement in respect <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

disputes, in the meantime. The<br />

matter was therefore adjourned<br />

upto August 17, 2004. On<br />

August 17, 2004, the matter was<br />

further adjourned to September<br />

14, 2004.<br />

G.L. Group <strong>and</strong> C.L. Group<br />

have accordingly commenced<br />

the settlement talks. In the<br />

meantime Ch<strong>and</strong>ru Raheja has<br />

filed reply on his own behalf <strong>and</strong><br />

for <strong>and</strong> on behalf <strong>of</strong> Neel<br />

Raheja <strong>and</strong> Ravi Raheja<br />

denying the allegations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

said perjury.<br />

C) Litigation Pending – Income Tax<br />

Set out below are income tax cases pending against various Promoter entities. None <strong>of</strong><br />

these cases would have a likely adverse effect on the financial performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Company.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1990-91<br />

K.Raheja Pvt. <strong>Limited</strong>.<br />

Cross Appeal<br />

The Company’s Return <strong>of</strong> Income was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax<br />

Act, 1961. The A.O disallowed interest <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5,45,316/-. The company filed an appeal<br />

with the CIT (A) (bearing No ITA No CIT (A) -XL \/DCSR-30/113/1993-94) against the<br />

disallowance made by the A.O. The CIT.(A) allowed the deduction <strong>of</strong> Rs.2,35,242/- on<br />

which the Department has gone in appeal .The company has filed a cross objection<br />

stating that the entire interest amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,45,316/- to be allowed as deduction from<br />

total income.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1991-92<br />

K.Raheja Pvt. <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Cross Appeal<br />

The company’s Return <strong>of</strong> Income was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax<br />

Act,1961. The A.O disallowed interest expenses amounting to Rs.8,25,243/- . The<br />

company filed an appeal with the CIT(A)( bearing No CIT (A) -XL/DC SR-30/28/94-95)<br />

against the disallowance. . Out <strong>of</strong> above, the CIT(A) allowed a deduction <strong>of</strong> Rs.2,26,121/-<br />

on which the Department has gone in appeal .The company has filed a cross objection<br />

stating that the entire amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.8,25,243/- to be allowed as a deduction from total<br />

income.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1994-95<br />

K.Raheja Corp Pvt. <strong>Limited</strong> (formerly Paramount Hotels <strong>Limited</strong>)<br />

The company’s Return <strong>of</strong> Income was assessed u/s.143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961<br />

Thereafter the case was reopened u/s.147.<br />

The A.O. disallowed interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.1,26,36,765/- u/s.36 (i) (iii) from the head "business<br />

income" However the interest allowed u/s.57 from the head 'income from other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!