24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

N) Potential Litigation<br />

There are none disclosed to our company<br />

Against the other ventures in which K Raheja Corp Group( C, L. Raheja Group)<br />

holds in excess <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the Equity Share Capital/ Interest.<br />

A) Pending Arbitration Proceedings<br />

There are none disclosed to our company<br />

B) Litigation pending – FEMA<br />

There are none disclosed to our company<br />

C) Litigation Pending – Income Tax<br />

D) Litigation pending – Sales Tax/ Luxury tax<br />

Euroweave Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs The Sales Tax Officer<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong>s aggregating to Rs. 3,32,342/- have been raised by the Sales Tax Department<br />

for the years 1992 – 1993, 1993-1994 <strong>and</strong> 1994-1995. The disputed matter is in appeal<br />

pending disposal.<br />

E) Litigation pending –Customs <strong>and</strong> Excise Gold Control Appellate (‘CEGAT’)<br />

Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Show cause Notice bearing F. No. V(32) 15-5/Adj/2002 dtd 20.3.2002 issued by the<br />

Joint Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Central Excise in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

Assessment Year 2000-01<br />

Our Promoter Group company Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. .Ltd. having central excise registration<br />

No AAA CT 010 QM 001 has been issued a notice to show cause cum dem<strong>and</strong> as to why<br />

M/S Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd <strong>and</strong> Pagel Concrete Technologies Pvt. Ltd. should not be<br />

treated as related person <strong>and</strong> Central Excise duty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 263426 for the period April 2000<br />

to March 2001 should not be recovered from them . The company has responded to the<br />

show cause notice vide letter dated July 6 2002 <strong>and</strong> the matter is pending.<br />

Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. .Ltd.<br />

Show cause Notice bearing F. No. Vch 32 (15) 19/TER/Adj/02/2061 dtd 1.4.2002<br />

issued by the Dy. Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Central Excise in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

Assessment Year 2001-02<br />

Our Promoter Group company Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. .Ltd. having central excise registration<br />

No AAA CT 010 QM 001 has been issued a notice to show cause cum dem<strong>and</strong> as to why<br />

M/S Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd <strong>and</strong> Pagel Concrete Technologies Pvt. Ltd. should not be<br />

treated as related person <strong>and</strong> Central Excise duty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 305061 for the period April 2001<br />

to March 2002 should not be recovered from them . The company has responded to the<br />

show cause notice vide letter dated July 6 2002 <strong>and</strong> the matter is pending.<br />

Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Show cause Notice bearing F. No. V(32) 15 279/Adj/01/PT.1 dtd 10.3.2002 issued by<br />

the Dy. Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Central Excise in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

Assessment Year 2002-03<br />

Our Promoter Group company Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. .Ltd. having Central Excise Registration<br />

No AAA CT 010 QM 001 has been issued a notice to show cause cum dem<strong>and</strong> as to<br />

why M/S Terraco <strong>India</strong> Pvt. Ltd <strong>and</strong> Pagel Concrete Technologies Pvt. Ltd. should not be<br />

treated as related person <strong>and</strong> central Excise duty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 41393 for the period 10-2-02 to<br />

31-8-02 should not be recovered from them . The company has responded to the show<br />

cause notice vide letter dated April 19 2003 <strong>and</strong> the matter is pending.<br />

F) Litigation Pending- Money Recovery <strong>and</strong> other Civil Suits<br />

High Court <strong>of</strong> Bombay<br />

Suit No 3085 <strong>of</strong> 1985<br />

Hotel Empire Ltd. vs.Juhu Beach Resorts Pvt. Ltd.<br />

Hotel Empire Pvt. Ltd. on 3 rd December, 1985 filed a suit bearing No 3085 <strong>of</strong> 1985 against<br />

Juhu Beach resort Pvt.Ltd at the High Court <strong>of</strong> Judicature, Mumbai for a declaration that<br />

Juhu Beach Resorts Pvt.Ltd was in wrongful possession <strong>and</strong> occupation <strong>of</strong> the property<br />

<strong>and</strong> for a declaration that the consent decree <strong>of</strong> suit No 1965 <strong>of</strong> 1985 is void. The suit is<br />

currently pending hearing. Juhu Beach Resort has filed a suit bearing no 284 <strong>of</strong> 1987<br />

against Hotel Empire for a declaration that the Agreement dated 16 th January ,1974<br />

between Hotel Empire <strong>and</strong> Juhu Beach Resorts is valid <strong>and</strong> binding. No interim<br />

proceeding has been taken out in this suit -<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!