Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Complaint. No.875/2002<br />
City Civil Court, Bangalore<br />
Padmini Murthy Vs.. Asiatic Properties Ltd..<br />
Padmini Murthy filed complaint alleging Asiatic Properties Ltd. is not entitled to claim any<br />
maintenance charged since it is utilizing the interest accrued on maintenance deposit held<br />
by it. She has also alleged ASIATIC PROPERTIES LTD. is holding surplus amount <strong>of</strong><br />
stamp duty <strong>and</strong> registration fee amounting to Rs.10,606/-. She claimed refund <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.10,606/- <strong>and</strong> surplus interest amounting to Rs.6,360/-. Asiatic Properties Ltd.<br />
engaged a counsel to represent it in the proceedings. Necessary counter affidavit has<br />
been filed.<br />
The case st<strong>and</strong>s posted to 05.04.2004 for arguments.<br />
ORIGINAL SUIT. No.212/2001<br />
The City Civil Court, Bangalore<br />
G.K. Mehta vs. Asiatic Properties Ltd..<br />
Mr.Gopala Krishna Mehta filed suit restraining Asiatic Properties Ltd. from dem<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
maintenance at the rate <strong>of</strong> Re.1.00 per sq.foot in respect <strong>of</strong> his flat etc. Asiatic Properties<br />
Ltd .engaged a counsel to represent it in the court <strong>and</strong> filed necessary counters,<br />
objections <strong>and</strong> statements. The court disallowed his prayer <strong>of</strong> interim order. He filed Misc.<br />
appeal no.20/2003 in the Additional Civil Judge Court. However the court asked the<br />
parties to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> settling the matter mutually.<br />
The Case is currently posted for hearing on 29.09.2004.<br />
MFA 1724/01 (in MVC No.976/94)<br />
High Court <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
S.R.Parthasarathi Vs. New <strong>India</strong> Assurance<br />
Co. Ltd. & Asiatic Properties Ltd.<br />
New <strong>India</strong> Insurance company has been ordered to deposit Rs.70,000/- plus 6% interest<br />
along with Rs.1,000/- towards cost in MVC No. 976/94. Aggrieved with this Order the<br />
Petitioner has filed MF appeal on 2.6.2001 against Insurance company <strong>and</strong> Asiatic<br />
Properties Ltd. before the High Court <strong>of</strong> Karnataka to enhance the compensation from<br />
Rs.70000/- to Rs.2,50,000/-. Asiatic Properties Ltd. has engaged a counsel to represent<br />
it before the High Court. The matter is yet to be taken up for hearing.<br />
The matter is not yet listed for hearing.<br />
High Court<br />
Writ Petition. No.28692/2001<br />
Sub-Registrar Vs. K. RAHEJA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION<br />
K. Raheja Development Corporation has challenged the Order <strong>of</strong> the Divisions<br />
Commissioner dated 21.05.2001 confirming the Order <strong>of</strong> the District Registrar in the High<br />
Court.<br />
The matter is pending before the High Court.<br />
Suit No 1270/ 1998<br />
Additional Sub- Court, Coimbatore<br />
Vs K. RAHEJA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION<br />
Raheja Centre, Minor Suit<br />
The issue involved being minor’s involvement in the property. Court’s permission not<br />
taken <strong>and</strong> minor’s amount due not deposited in the Bank. Required written statements<br />
has been filed by the Defendants.<br />
Due to change in the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Sub-courts, this suit has been transferred to District<br />
Munsif court.<br />
The date <strong>of</strong> hearing from the New court is awaited.<br />
294
Change language