Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Metropolitan Magistrate,Mumbai<br />
CC No 125/SS <strong>of</strong> 2004<br />
Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajdhani Restaurants<br />
A bill was raised bearing KF /3008 –C /2002-03 dated September 30 2003 for<br />
Rs.10,91,475 by Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. on Rajdhani Restaurants, being fees for<br />
finalising commercial deal <strong>of</strong> 8000 Sq ft at Crystal Plaza , Andheri Link Road , Andheri<br />
(West), Mumbai for them. Against that bill, Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. received Rs. 2<br />
00,000 <strong>and</strong> 4 post dated cheques for the remaining amount(net <strong>of</strong> TDS)which have since<br />
bounced. This case pertains to the bouncing <strong>of</strong> Cheque <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100000 against the<br />
payment due.<br />
.<br />
Notices have been served <strong>and</strong> a suit has been filed under section 138 <strong>of</strong> the Negotiable<br />
Instruments Act, 1881. The case was posted for hearing on 4 th June 2004 but the same<br />
has now been adjourned to 29 th September, 2004.<br />
Metropolitan Magistrate,Mumbai<br />
CC No 716/SS <strong>of</strong> 2004<br />
Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajdhani Restaurants<br />
A bill was raised bearing KF /3008 –C /2002-03 dated September 30 2003 for<br />
Rs.1,091,475 by Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. on Rajdhani Restaurants, being fees for<br />
finalising commercial deal <strong>of</strong> 8000 Sq ft at Crystal Plaza , Andheri Link Road , Andheri<br />
(West), Mumbai for them. Against that bill, Knight Frank (<strong>India</strong>) Pvt. Ltd. received<br />
Rs.200,000 <strong>and</strong> 4 post dated cheques for the remaining amount(net <strong>of</strong> TDS) which have<br />
since bounced. This case pertains to the bouncing <strong>of</strong> a Cheque <strong>of</strong> Rs. 334,172 against the<br />
payment due.<br />
Notices have been served <strong>and</strong> a suit has been filed under section 138 <strong>of</strong> the Negotiable<br />
Instruments Act, 1881.The case is posted for hearing on 3-9-2004.<br />
In the Court <strong>of</strong> Metropolitan Magistrate , Mumbai<br />
J W Marriott Hotel(Prop. Juhu Beach Resorts Ltd) V/s Peter Majtan<br />
Final Report Form – Charge Sheet dated 20 th December, 2002<br />
FIR No.469 <strong>of</strong> 25.11.2002<br />
A charge sheet has been filed by the Asstt. Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Police <strong>and</strong> the Sr Inspector<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Santacruz Police Station in the 21 st Court <strong>of</strong> Metropolitan Magistrate , Mumbai<br />
under Section 173 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure Code in respect <strong>of</strong> FIR No.469 <strong>of</strong><br />
25.11.2002, against Mr. Peter Majtan, a foreign national for defrauding the J W Marriott<br />
Hotel to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7,41,770/- , being the unpaid bill amount for his stay in the J W<br />
Marriott hotel <strong>and</strong> also for giving a false cheque <strong>of</strong> Rs.50,000/- even though there was<br />
inadequate balance in the Account for the cheque drawn. The matter is pending in the<br />
Court <strong>of</strong> Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai<br />
H) Litigation Pending – Labour, Employees <strong>and</strong> Trade Unions<br />
There are none disclosed to our company<br />
I) Bank / Financial Institution Defaults<br />
There are none disclosed to our company<br />
J) Non Payment <strong>of</strong> Statutory Dues <strong>and</strong>/or dues towards instrument holders such as<br />
debenture holders, fixed deposits<br />
There are none disclosed to our company<br />
K) Disciplinary action taken by SEBI / Stock <strong>Exchange</strong>s against the other ventures in<br />
which K Raheja Corp Group( C, L. Raheja Group) holds in excess <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Equity Share Capital/ Interest.<br />
Not applicable<br />
L) Arrears on cumulative preference shares by the other ventures in which K Raheja<br />
Corp Group( C, L. Raheja Group) holds in excess <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the Equity Share<br />
Capital/ Interest<br />
There are none disclosed to our company<br />
M) Pending Litigations <strong>of</strong> companies/firms/ventures with which the other ventures in<br />
which K Raheja Corp Group( C, L. Raheja Group) holds in excess <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Equity Share Capital/ Interest.<br />
There are none disclosed to our company<br />
300