24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

High Court <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

Writ Petition No 2399 <strong>of</strong> 2003<br />

Sukhminder Singh Hundal vs. State <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra & Others<br />

Mr. Sukhminder Singh Hundal, President <strong>of</strong> the Apni party <strong>and</strong> the Hundal's Welfare<br />

Association addressed Mr. CL Raheja vide letter dated May 20 2002 seeking details about<br />

certain flats at Powai & Borivili on behalf <strong>of</strong> 222 persons belonging to the weaker section<br />

<strong>of</strong> society who wished to purchase these flats. The Advocate on behalf <strong>of</strong> Hundal<br />

Association calling upon the members <strong>of</strong> the monitoring Committee to take action<br />

regarding the applications issued another letter dated June 20 2003.Based on these<br />

correspondence, the above petition was filed. The Court passed a similar order as in the<br />

earlier Writ Petition 1915 <strong>of</strong> 2001.<br />

Petition admitted by an order dated 24 th March,2004<br />

Matter is referred to Monitoring Committee.<br />

High Court <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

PIL Stamp No 131 <strong>of</strong> 2003<br />

1. Sunil Patil vs. State <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra & others<br />

K.Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd (Respondent No4) has been allocated bulk plot <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

admeasuring about 29,000 sq.mt in sector 30 A <strong>of</strong> Vashi by CIDCO to develop a well<br />

planned Complex consisting <strong>of</strong> retail, hospitality residential unit etc<br />

The above PIL has been filed challenging the said allotment in favor <strong>of</strong> Respondent No 4<br />

interalia for cancelling the said allotment in favor <strong>of</strong> Respondent No 4 <strong>and</strong> directing<br />

Respondent No 2 to issue fresh advertisement in the same. By an order dated 17 12 2003<br />

pending the admission the Honorable Court had issued directions to maintain Status Quo.<br />

The Petition is admitted on 18.2.2004.By an Order dated 23.4. 2004 stay is vacated.<br />

2. High Court <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

PIL Stamp No St. 7637 <strong>of</strong> 2004<br />

1. S K Surve vs. State <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra & others<br />

K.Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd (Respondent No4) has been allocated bulk plot <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

admeasuring about 29,000 sq.mt in sector 30 A <strong>of</strong> Vashi by CIDCO to develop a well<br />

planned Complex consisting <strong>of</strong> retail, hospitality residential unit etc<br />

The above PIL has been filed challenging the said allotment in favor <strong>of</strong> Respondent No 4<br />

interalia for cancelling the said allotment in favor <strong>of</strong> Respondent No 4 <strong>and</strong> directing<br />

Respondent No 2 to issue fresh advertisement in the same. By an order dated 17 12 2003<br />

pending the admission the Honorable Court had issued directions to maintain Status Quo.<br />

Petition is admitted on 18.2.2004. By an Order dated 23.4. 2004 stay is vacated.<br />

High Court <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

Summary suit No 4531 <strong>of</strong> 1993<br />

M/S Saraswati Industries (Exports) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Powai Development Corporation<br />

Ch<strong>and</strong>ru Raheja, Gopal Raheja M/S Paramount Hotels Ltd(now K Raheja Corp Pvt.<br />

Ltd)<br />

A suit for refund <strong>of</strong> an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50, 00, 000 paid as advance with interest at 9% p.a.<br />

was instituted by Saraswati Industries (Export) Pvt. Ltd. against C.L Raheja, <strong>and</strong> M/S<br />

Paramount Hotels Pvt. Ltd., which was paid as an advance towards booking <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

units constructed at Powai.<br />

The Plaintiff prayed for a decree against the Defendants to pay to the Plaintiff a sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 73,71,800/- which is inclusive <strong>of</strong> interest at 9% p.a.<br />

The Matter is still pending in the High Court<br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!