24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – III, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.23,70,916/- made by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) being the provision<br />

made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging interest <strong>of</strong> Rs. 13149/- u/s<br />

234C the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1996-97<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />

by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.18,00,000/-being the<br />

provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs 31496/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1997-98<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />

by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.70,00,000/-being the<br />

provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised.<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />

by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.54,00,000/-being the<br />

provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 20433/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-00<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The trust has filed an appeal to the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore<br />

against the order u/s 143 (3) <strong>of</strong> the Assessing Officer -Asstt. Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income<br />

Tax Circle 1-(1) , Bangalore making a disallowance <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.55,00,000/-being the<br />

provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 118668/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

Writ Appeal No.1336/04<br />

Div. Bench <strong>of</strong> the High Court<br />

Ashoka Apartments Pvt.Ltd. Vs. (1) I.T.<br />

Commissioner (2) Dr.V.A. Ram (3) Mrs. Rama G<br />

Pursuant to the agreement entered into with Dr.V.A. Ram, a statement in form no.37-I,<br />

was filed before the Appropriate authority. The said A.A. ordered pre-emptive purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

the property. Subsequently, it was auctioned. Respon.NO.3 namely Mrs. Rama G.<br />

Jadhav was the successful bidder. The possession <strong>of</strong> the property was also h<strong>and</strong>ed over<br />

to her. This Order was challenged before the High Court. Subsequently, in the light <strong>of</strong> C.B.<br />

Goutam’s case, the case was rem<strong>and</strong>ed to A.A. for fresh enquiry. However, once against<br />

the AA Ordered directing pre-emptive purchase <strong>of</strong> the property. In the W.P. No. 3011/96<br />

this order passed second time is challenged. The High Court on 19.01.2004 disallowed<br />

the W.PNo.3011/96. Aggrieved with this order, Ashoka Apartments Pvt.Ltd., filed Writ<br />

Appeal NO.1336/2004 before the Division Bench <strong>of</strong> the High Court <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.<br />

The Matter is yet to be listed for hearing.<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!