Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96<br />
R & M Trust<br />
The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />
Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – III, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.23,70,916/- made by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) being the provision<br />
made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging interest <strong>of</strong> Rs. 13149/- u/s<br />
234C the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1996-97<br />
R & M Trust<br />
The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />
Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />
by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.18,00,000/-being the<br />
provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs 31496/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1997-98<br />
R & M Trust<br />
The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />
Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />
by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.70,00,000/-being the<br />
provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99<br />
R & M Trust<br />
The trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />
Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance made<br />
by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143 (3) for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.54,00,000/-being the<br />
provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 20433/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-00<br />
R & M Trust<br />
The trust has filed an appeal to the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – I, Bangalore<br />
against the order u/s 143 (3) <strong>of</strong> the Assessing Officer -Asstt. Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income<br />
Tax Circle 1-(1) , Bangalore making a disallowance <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.55,00,000/-being the<br />
provision made for expenses to be incurred ( which are not contingent in nature) in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the projects whose income has been recognised <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 118668/- u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
Writ Appeal No.1336/04<br />
Div. Bench <strong>of</strong> the High Court<br />
Ashoka Apartments Pvt.Ltd. Vs. (1) I.T.<br />
Commissioner (2) Dr.V.A. Ram (3) Mrs. Rama G<br />
Pursuant to the agreement entered into with Dr.V.A. Ram, a statement in form no.37-I,<br />
was filed before the Appropriate authority. The said A.A. ordered pre-emptive purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
the property. Subsequently, it was auctioned. Respon.NO.3 namely Mrs. Rama G.<br />
Jadhav was the successful bidder. The possession <strong>of</strong> the property was also h<strong>and</strong>ed over<br />
to her. This Order was challenged before the High Court. Subsequently, in the light <strong>of</strong> C.B.<br />
Goutam’s case, the case was rem<strong>and</strong>ed to A.A. for fresh enquiry. However, once against<br />
the AA Ordered directing pre-emptive purchase <strong>of</strong> the property. In the W.P. No. 3011/96<br />
this order passed second time is challenged. The High Court on 19.01.2004 disallowed<br />
the W.PNo.3011/96. Aggrieved with this order, Ashoka Apartments Pvt.Ltd., filed Writ<br />
Appeal NO.1336/2004 before the Division Bench <strong>of</strong> the High Court <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.<br />
The Matter is yet to be listed for hearing.<br />
267