24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessment Year 2000-01(local)<br />

K.R Trends sales tax return for the assessment year 2000-01 was assessed by the<br />

assistant commissioner <strong>of</strong> commercial tax (ACCT) under section 12 <strong>of</strong> the Karnataka<br />

sales tax act 1957. The ACCT revised the taxable turnover <strong>and</strong> worked out the tax<br />

payable to be Rs.1,62,350/-. An appeal was filed on January 14, 2004 stating that the<br />

annual return was not accepted as refund claims amounting to Rs.2,600,000/- differed<br />

from the monthly returns <strong>and</strong> the annual returns. Also this amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.162,350/- has<br />

been paid under protest.<br />

CHENNAI<br />

Assessment Year 2001-02(Local)<br />

M/s K R Trends-Chennai was assessed for Local Sale Tax Assessment (TNGST) for the<br />

year 2001-02. The Assessing Authority calculated Sales Tax liability on gross Sales<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> net sales & disallowed Sales Return leading to Sales Tax dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.6,606,934/-, including penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs.2,877,902/-. The company further filed an appeal<br />

on January 12,2004 against the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> deposited Rs. 9,32,258/- against the stay.<br />

The case was heard before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Commercial Taxes,<br />

Chennai, <strong>and</strong> he passed the order dt. July 21, 2004, whereby the appeal has been<br />

allowed partly <strong>and</strong> partly rem<strong>and</strong>ed back with clear directions in company’s favor, to the<br />

Jurisdictional Assessing Authority for Assessment.<br />

Assessment Year 2001-02(Central)<br />

M/s K R Trends-Chennai was assessed for Central Sales Tax Assessment for the year<br />

2001-02. The Assessing Authority calculated Sales Tax liability by disallowing Stock<br />

Transfer made out <strong>of</strong> Chennai leading to Sales Tax Dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4,417,890/- including<br />

penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs.2,650,734/-. The company further filed an appeal on January 12,2004<br />

against the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> deposited Rs.441,790/- against the stay. The case was heard<br />

before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Commercial Taxes, Chennai <strong>and</strong> he<br />

passed the order dt. July 21, 2004, whereby the case has been rem<strong>and</strong>ed back with clear<br />

directions in company's favor, to the Jurisdictional Assessing Authority for Assessment.<br />

Assessment Year 2002-03(Local)<br />

M/s K R Trends-Chennai was assessed for Local Sale Tax Assessment (TNGST) for the<br />

year 2002-03. The Assessing Authority calculated Sales Tax liability on gross Sales<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> net sales & disallowed Sales Return leading to Sales Tax dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.3,523,860/-including penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs.1,761,930/-. The company further filed an appeal on<br />

31 st May 2004 against the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> deposited Rs.470,000/- against the stay. Currently<br />

the matter is in appeal with Appellate Assistant Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Commercial Taxes,<br />

Chennai.<br />

Assessment Year 2002-03. (Central)<br />

M/s K R Trends-Chennai was assessed for Central Sales Tax Assessment for the year<br />

2002-03. The Assessing Authority calculated Sales Tax liability by disallowing Stock<br />

Transfer made out <strong>of</strong> Chennai leading to Sales Tax Dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4,243,372/- including<br />

penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs.2,546,023/-. The company further filed an appeal on 30 th June 2004 against<br />

the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> deposited Rs.551,639/- against the stay. Currently the matter is in appeal<br />

with Appellate Assistant Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Commercial Taxes, Chennai<br />

E) Litigation Pending - Customs <strong>and</strong> Excise Gold Control Appellate (‘CEGAT’)<br />

There are none<br />

F) Litigation Pending - Money Recovery <strong>and</strong> Other Civil Suits<br />

There are none<br />

G) Economic / criminal / civil <strong>of</strong>fences by Promoters, companies <strong>and</strong> firms promoted<br />

by the Promoters <strong>and</strong> past cases in which penalties were imposed by the<br />

concerned authorities<br />

There are none<br />

H) Litigation Pending – Labour, Employees <strong>and</strong> Trade Unions<br />

There are none<br />

I) Bank / Financial Institution Defaults<br />

There are none<br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!