24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The order <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income Tax ( Appeals) is awaited.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99<br />

K. Raheja Hotels & Estates Private <strong>Limited</strong><br />

The company has filed an appeal to the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax ( Appeals) – I,<br />

against the order <strong>of</strong> Assessing Officer – DCIT (Asstt) Circle 11(1), Bangalore, u/s143 (3)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the Annual Value <strong>of</strong> property let out to<br />

Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., should be Rs.18,00,000/- as disclosed in the return<br />

which represents the actual rent received under the facts <strong>and</strong> circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> Rs.94,44,000/- as estimated by the Assessing Officer <strong>and</strong> against the wrongful<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> Annual Value <strong>of</strong> property let out to UTI Bank at Rs.17,95,200/- by the<br />

Assessing Officer as against Rs.10,23,000/- being the rent actually receive . The company<br />

has also appealed against the reference to the Divisional Valuation Officer by the<br />

Assessing Officer u/s 133(6) for determination <strong>of</strong> Annual Value <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid<br />

properties.<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income Tax ( Appeals) is awaited.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR –1992-93<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation<br />

The firm has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income Tax ( Appeals) – III, Bangalore sustaining the following<br />

disallowances made by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Act, (i)in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.18,000/-attributable to interest free advance given to Mr.<br />

Rajendra Halve out <strong>of</strong> commercial expediency, (ii)in respect <strong>of</strong> Rs.8,20,400/- paid by way<br />

<strong>of</strong> compensation to the earlier allottees <strong>of</strong> the units in the building upon their cancellation<br />

<strong>and</strong> (iii)in respect <strong>of</strong> telephone <strong>and</strong> vehicle expenses <strong>of</strong> Rs.20,000/- on the grounds <strong>of</strong><br />

personal use.<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is awaited.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR –1996-97<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation<br />

The firm has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order <strong>of</strong><br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income Tax ( Appeals) – I, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.98,50,000/- made by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Act, in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> expenditure yet to be incurred for pending work in a contract in respect <strong>of</strong> which the<br />

income has been recognized on computed contract method <strong>and</strong> against charging <strong>of</strong><br />

interest <strong>of</strong> Rs 20,74,590/- u/s 234B <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is awaited.<br />

ASESSMENT YEAR –2001-02<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation<br />

The firm has filed an appeal to the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax ( Appeals) , against the<br />

order u/s143 (3) <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961 passed by the Assessing Officer – ACIT<br />

Central Circle 1(4), Bangalore, in respect <strong>of</strong> disallowance <strong>of</strong> bad debts amounting to Rs<br />

19,24,09,280/- written <strong>of</strong>f during the year <strong>and</strong> for charging <strong>of</strong> interest Rs 1,92,19,056/- u/s<br />

234B <strong>and</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> Rs 7,27,748/- u/s 234D <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax ( Appeals) is awaited.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1994-95<br />

R & M Trust<br />

The said trust has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order<br />

<strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Appeals) – III, Bangalore sustaining the disallowance<br />

made by the Assessing Officer in his order u/s 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Act in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

administrative expenses which were erroneously capitalized to Work In Progress by the<br />

company, for ignoring the claim in the revised return for allowance <strong>of</strong> expenditure on the<br />

ground that such return is invalid as beyond the period mentioned in section 139 (5) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act <strong>and</strong> for charging interest u/s 234B <strong>of</strong> Rs 64952/- <strong>and</strong> u/s 234C <strong>of</strong> Rs 18789/- .<br />

The matter is pending.<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!