24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ex Pet No. 2344/2000 (ORIGINAL SUIT. 6117)<br />

City Civil Court, Bangalore<br />

Arjun M.Menda ( K. Raheja development Corporation) vs. Harilakshmi Talkies & Ors<br />

After obtaining a decree dated 13.09.2000 against Harilaksmi Theatre, in the suit no.<br />

6117/92, the Execution Petition No.2344/2000 has been filed on 7.12.2000, requesting the<br />

court to execute a Sale Deed in favour <strong>of</strong> the Plaintiff. The balance sale price <strong>of</strong> Rs.37<br />

lakhs was also deposited in the Court. Since Notices issued to certain Defendants were<br />

returned unserved, substitute service by way <strong>of</strong> paper publication was taken with the order<br />

<strong>of</strong> the court <strong>and</strong> the same was published in the Times <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong> on 21.1.2002. Draft Sale<br />

Deed has been submitted to the Court. The Court has scrutinized it. Now further order to<br />

execute the Sale Deed is awaited.<br />

The Case st<strong>and</strong>s posted on 28.8.2004 for further order touching the execution <strong>of</strong> Sale<br />

Deed.<br />

Defamation Suit No.1048/02<br />

The City Civil Court, Bangalore<br />

K. RAHEJA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Vs. Residence Apex Body & Others<br />

Apex Body, Associations <strong>and</strong> its certain <strong>of</strong>fice bearers in Raheja Residency, Bangalore<br />

Project have started interfering with K. Raheja Development Corporation’s right in dealing<br />

with car parking spaces in the project. Since the said acts <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid bodies <strong>and</strong><br />

other <strong>of</strong>fice bearers amount to defaming the K. Raheja Development Corporation <strong>and</strong><br />

sl<strong>and</strong>ering the property rights, defamation suit has been filed on 13.2.2002 claiming Rs.1<br />

Crore as damages. Interim order preventing the above parties from publishing/circulating<br />

against K. Raheja Development Corporation has also been secured.<br />

The Case st<strong>and</strong>s posted on 20.09.2004 for arguments on interim matter.<br />

Original Suit No.3823/87<br />

City Civil Court, Bangalore<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation Vs. Papanna & Others<br />

Mr. Papanna & Others failed to establish marketable title to the property. Hence a suit<br />

has been filed by K. Raheja Development Corporation for recovery <strong>of</strong> Rs.75,875/- <strong>and</strong><br />

interest thereon at 18% per annum in the matter <strong>of</strong> agreement <strong>of</strong> sale, which was entered<br />

into between the Plaintiffs <strong>and</strong> the Defendants on 15.10.1985 in respect <strong>of</strong> the site<br />

Nos.367, 368, 379 <strong>and</strong> 370, situated in Survey No.47/11, HA Sanitary <strong>Board</strong> Area,<br />

Bangalore.<br />

The Case is posted to 14.09.2004 – for marking <strong>of</strong> documents <strong>and</strong> leading evidence.<br />

Civil Appeal No.12928/96 (SLP.18879/96)<br />

the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong><br />

K. RAHEJA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Vs. Official Liquidator (KSFC Auction)<br />

– Intl. Coach Buil. Prop<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation participated in the KSFC auction sale proceedings in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the International Coach Builders Property <strong>and</strong> paid as below:<br />

Rs.50000/- - Paid EMD on 12.9.90<br />

Rs.20,75,000/- - 25% down payment on Rs.85 lakhs (any reason this was omitted)<br />

Rs.7,87,123/- interest @ 20% P.A. on Rs.85 lakhs<br />

towards part <strong>of</strong> bid amount. In the meanwhile, International Coach Builders <strong>Limited</strong>, was<br />

ordered to be wound up. The Official Liquidator has started objecting the sale. The<br />

company court granted permission to the SFC to proceed with the sale. The Officials<br />

Liquidator filed appeal before the Supreme Court challenging the company’s court order.<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation also filed Special Leave Petition no.18879/96, which<br />

was converted as Civil Appeal No.12928/96. The Supreme Court by its order dated<br />

5.3.2003 directed that Financial Corporation is at liberty from moving the learned company<br />

Judge for appropriate directions for realization <strong>of</strong> the sale proceeds <strong>of</strong> the assets. The<br />

aforesaid appeal was accordingly disposed <strong>of</strong>f with no order as to any costs.<br />

K. Raheja Development Corporation has sent its written communication to KSFC seeking<br />

refund <strong>of</strong> the amounts paid with interest. However, the KSFC has expressed its<br />

willingness to refund without any interest. Therefore, K. Raheja Development Corporation<br />

is waiting the steps to be taken by KSFC before the company Court, so that K. Raheja<br />

Development Corporation can also urge refund with interest in the Court.<br />

269

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!