24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Suit No. 542 <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Civil Judge, Sr. Division Suit, Pune<br />

Paramount Hotels Ltd. (now K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd) VS Tropicana Properties Ltd.<br />

Suit under Section 6 <strong>of</strong> the Specific Relief Act in respect <strong>of</strong> Repossession <strong>of</strong> Office Space<br />

on the 2 nd <strong>and</strong> 3 rd floors <strong>of</strong> the building Raheja Chambers situated at Survey No. 361,<br />

Hissa No. 1, Bund Garden Road, Pune have been filed by Paramount Hotels Ltd. .(now K<br />

Raheja Corp Pvt. :Ltd) against wrongful occupation <strong>and</strong> possession by Tropicana<br />

Properties Ltd.. The plaintiffs have also prayed for appointment <strong>of</strong> a Court Receiver <strong>and</strong><br />

restraining Tropicana Properties Ltd. from dealing with the suit premises in any manner<br />

<strong>and</strong> for attachment <strong>and</strong> sealing <strong>of</strong> the suit premises. The matter is pending.<br />

Protest letter dated 10 th April, 2004 filed with Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater<br />

Mumbai (MCGM) by Powai Developers(a division <strong>of</strong> K Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd) Bldg..<br />

No. 29 – Raheja Vihar, Powai<br />

A protest letter dated 10 th April, 2004 has been filed by Powai Developers, a division <strong>of</strong> K<br />

Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd. to MCGM against the Ratable value computed by Municipal<br />

Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai in respect <strong>of</strong> Municipal Tax Assessment <strong>of</strong> Bldg. No. 29 -<br />

Raheja Vihar, Powai, Village Powai, Tungwa- Ward No. L4467. The rateable value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building as arrived at by Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai is Rs. 4,15,840/- <strong>and</strong><br />

based on which a dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs.10,18,808/- has been made for the period from 1/4/2002<br />

to 31/3/2004. The company has paid a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2,40,000 under protest <strong>and</strong> matter is<br />

pending for disposal.<br />

Protest letter dated 10 th April, 2004 filed with Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater<br />

Mumbai by Powai Developers(a division <strong>of</strong> K Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd)<br />

Bldg.. No. 30 – Raheja Vihar, Powai<br />

A protest letter dated 10 th April, 2004 has been filed with Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater<br />

Mumbai (MCGM) in respect <strong>of</strong> Municipal Tax Assessment <strong>of</strong> Bldg.. No. 30 – Raheja<br />

Vihar, Powai, Village Powai, Tungwa- Ward No. L4467 the rateable value <strong>of</strong> the building<br />

as arrived at by the MCGM is Rs.4,16,770/- <strong>and</strong> based on which a dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.8,93,453/- has been made for the period from 1/7/2002 to 31/3/2004. The matter is<br />

pending for disposal.<br />

Bombay City Civil Court<br />

Suit No 4605 <strong>of</strong> 1992<br />

N.N. Wadia vs. Shantidevi Kumbhar<br />

N. N. Wadia as the sole Administrator <strong>of</strong> the Estate <strong>and</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> the Late F.E. Dinshaw<br />

, the owner <strong>of</strong> the L<strong>and</strong> has entered into a Development Agreement with Ivory Properties<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt Ltd. for development <strong>of</strong> his l<strong>and</strong>. Ivory Properties <strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt Ltd is a<br />

promoter company. In terms <strong>of</strong> the Development Agreement executed between N. N.<br />

Wadia as the sole Administrator <strong>of</strong> the Estate <strong>of</strong> Late F.E. Dinshaw, the Plaintiff in the<br />

aforesaid suit <strong>and</strong> Ivory Properties <strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt. Ltd., . Ivory Properties <strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt.<br />

Ltd. has been given the responsibility <strong>and</strong> is entitled to look after the litigation <strong>and</strong> enter<br />

into arrangement <strong>and</strong> settlement at its cost, charges <strong>and</strong> expenses in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

litigation concerning the said l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

The Plaintiff has filed a suit in the civil court bearing no <strong>of</strong> 4605 <strong>of</strong> 1992 for a declaration<br />

that the defendant has no right, title, interest or claim in respect <strong>of</strong> portion <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong><br />

admeasuring 67 sq meters being part <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> bearing CTS no 1406/18 <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Malad. The court passed a decree in favour <strong>of</strong> the plaintiff.<br />

Currently the appeal filed by the Defendant in the High Court is admitted <strong>and</strong> pending for<br />

hearing .<br />

Bombay City Civil Court<br />

Suit No 3196 <strong>of</strong> 1981<br />

N.N. Wadia & others vs. Gundecha Builders & Ors<br />

N. N. Wadia as the sole Administrator <strong>of</strong> the Estate <strong>and</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> the Late F.E Dinshaw<br />

, the owner <strong>of</strong> the L<strong>and</strong> has entered into a Development Agreement with Ivory Properties<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt Ltd. for development <strong>of</strong> his l<strong>and</strong>. Ivory Properties <strong>and</strong> Hotels Pvt Ltd is a<br />

promoter company. In terms <strong>of</strong> the Development Agreement executed between N. N.<br />

Wadia as the sole Administrator <strong>of</strong> the Estate <strong>of</strong> Late F.E. Dinshaw, the Plaintiff in the<br />

246

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!