24.11.2012 Views

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

Shopper's Stop Limited - Securities and Exchange Board of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSESSMENT YEAR - 1998-99<br />

Casa Maria Properties Pvt. Ltd.<br />

The company’s Return was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961.<br />

The A.O disallowed Interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.4,04,395/- relating to investment in shares. The<br />

company filed an appeal (bearing No CIT(A)XLII/SR./IT.109/2000-01)to CIT (A) <strong>and</strong><br />

CIT(A) rejected the company's appeal.<br />

The company has appealed to ITAT against the Order <strong>of</strong> the CIT(A).<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR - 1998-99<br />

Raghukool Estate Dev. Pvt. Ltd.<br />

The company’s Return was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961.<br />

The A.O disallowed Interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.3,99,050/- relating to investment in shares. The<br />

company filed an appeal bearing No CIT(A)XLII/SR./IT.100/2000-01 to CIT (A) <strong>and</strong><br />

CIT(A) rejected the company's appeal.<br />

The company has appealed to ITAT against the Order <strong>of</strong> the CIT(A).<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR -1998-99<br />

K. Raheja Corp Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Paramount Hotels <strong>Limited</strong>)<br />

The company’s Return was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961.<br />

The A.O disallowed interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.56,77,721/- relating to investment in shares <strong>and</strong> further<br />

disallowed sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.1,01,997/- being expenditure incurred on increase in share capital<br />

during the year <strong>and</strong> also depreciation <strong>of</strong> Rs.40,028/- on assets acquired from outside <strong>India</strong><br />

where no tax was deducted at source. ( u/s.40a(i)) . The company filed an appeal (bearing<br />

No CIT(A)C-V/DCCC.29/141/2001-02) against these disallowances <strong>and</strong> CIT(A) rejected<br />

the company appeal.<br />

The company has further appealed against the order <strong>of</strong> the CIT(A) with ITAT.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99<br />

Ivory Properties And Hotels Pvt. Ltd.<br />

The company’s Return was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961.<br />

The A.O disallowed finance cost <strong>of</strong> Rs.10,35,406/- treating the same as forming part <strong>of</strong><br />

work in progress. Further, the AO reduced from work in progress Rs.17,67,490/- paid as<br />

technical fees to Skidmore Owing & Merrill LIP <strong>and</strong> Rs.19,56,221/- being reimbursement<br />

<strong>of</strong> expenses incurred on foreign Technicians on the ground that no TDS was deducted out<br />

<strong>of</strong> these two payments. The company filed appeal to CIT (A) bearing No CIT(A)C-<br />

V/DCCC29/142/2001-02 against these disallowances.<br />

The Appeal was rejected by the CIT(A).The company has appealed against the Order <strong>of</strong><br />

the CIT(A) with ITAT.<br />

ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99<br />

K. Raheja Pvt. Ltd.<br />

The company’s Return was assessed under section 143(3) <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, 1961.<br />

The A.O disallowed as finance cost <strong>of</strong> Rs.61,24,181/- as forming part <strong>of</strong> work in progress<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> incomplete project. Further the AO disallowed interest Rs.35,00,000/-<br />

relating to investment in shares. The AO also disallowed 1/10 th <strong>of</strong> preliminary expenses<br />

u/s.35D <strong>of</strong> Rs.93,092/-. The AO also made an addition <strong>of</strong> Rs.6,05,915/- by disallowing the<br />

claim for estimated expenses towards swimming pool <strong>and</strong> Club House. The company<br />

filed an appeal (bearing No CIT(A)C-V/DCCC29/IT79/2000-01) against the<br />

disallowances.<br />

The Appeal was rejected by the CIT(A).The company has appealed against the Order <strong>of</strong><br />

the CIT(A) with ITAT.<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!