47. Pakistan Economic Survey 2011-12 - Consultancy Services in ...
47. Pakistan Economic Survey 2011-12 - Consultancy Services in ...
47. Pakistan Economic Survey 2011-12 - Consultancy Services in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pakistan</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>12</strong>The production data received from the OilCompanies Advisory Committee (OCAC)compris<strong>in</strong>g of 11 items, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Industries andProduction 36 items and the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Bureau ofStatistics 65 items respectively have contributed <strong>in</strong>LSM growth as -0.26 percent, 0.75 percent and0.55 percent.Fig 3.1: LSM Growth rates (Y-o-Y)15.010.05.00.0-5.0-10.0Jul-10Aug-10Sept-10Oct-10Growth rateNov-10Dec-10Jan-11Feb-11Mar-11Apr-11May-11June-11July-11Aug-11Sept-11Oct-11Nov-11Dec-11Jan-<strong>12</strong>Feb-<strong>12</strong>Mar-<strong>12</strong>Source: <strong>Pakistan</strong> Bureau of StatisticsThe growth rate <strong>in</strong> Large Scale Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g(LSM) has recovered, largely due to goodperformance among the sub categories such asfood, beverages and tobacco, paper and board,textile, non-metallic m<strong>in</strong>eral products,pharmaceutical and leather products compared tonegative growth seen dur<strong>in</strong>g the second quarter ofthe current fiscal year. The Year to Year positivegrowth dur<strong>in</strong>g the start of current fiscal year (July-Sep) can be partially attributed to export demandwhich has <strong>in</strong>creased the production <strong>in</strong> the shortrun. Dismal performance was seen <strong>in</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>terseason (Oct-Dec) which was due to persistent gasshortages. Moreover, agro-based <strong>in</strong>dustries whichwere recover<strong>in</strong>g from the impact of the floods of2010, was aga<strong>in</strong> hit by another natural calamity <strong>in</strong>the form of heavy ra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>dh dur<strong>in</strong>g August<strong>2011</strong>. The cotton crop is most vulnerable to floodsand almost all major sugarcane produc<strong>in</strong>g districtswere affected but losses to sugarcane were loweras the crop is relatively resilient to flood<strong>in</strong>g. Thefloods also damaged <strong>in</strong>dustrial supply networksand rural demand and this coupled with severepower and natural gas shortages led to a number ofkey <strong>in</strong>dustries (textile, fertilizer, steel, glass etc)not operat<strong>in</strong>g at expected levels.LSM production began to revive <strong>in</strong> December<strong>2011</strong> as the impact of flood began to subside. Aremarkable growth of 6.0 percent was witnessed <strong>in</strong>Feb-20<strong>12</strong>. This could also be attributed to thebeneficial effect of specific policies on large scale<strong>in</strong>dustry. Effective fiscal policy helped <strong>in</strong>revitaliz<strong>in</strong>g the growth to some extent due toreduction <strong>in</strong> duties on beverages, automobiles,cement and air conditioners. This step wasnecessitated <strong>in</strong> view of the costly <strong>in</strong>put prices andthe need to absorb the volatility <strong>in</strong> the productionof these <strong>in</strong>dustries. In addition, the growth <strong>in</strong> agrobased<strong>in</strong>dustries was based on <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cotton(Punjab) and sugarcane production dur<strong>in</strong>g thecurrent fiscal year. In March 20<strong>12</strong>, the year to yearperformance of the sector turned negative byregister<strong>in</strong>g a decl<strong>in</strong>e of 3.7 percent ow<strong>in</strong>g toprolonged power and gas shortages.Group-wise PerformanceThe group-wise analysis (Table 3.1) <strong>in</strong>dicatessome of the groups <strong>in</strong> the Large Scale38