11.07.2015 Views

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> these sludges, however, are generally lower than those found in C/F sludges due to the increasedvolume <strong>of</strong> solids produced.Selection <strong>of</strong> H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Disposal OptionsLS blowdown is slightly more dense than C/F blowdown. Typical solids content ranges from1.0 to 4.0 percent, depending on raw water hardness. Gravity thickening may be used to pretreat LSsludges prior to their h<strong>and</strong>ling by other mechanical or non-mechanical dewatering processes. Filterpresses are capable <strong>of</strong> attaining final LS sludge solids contents in the range <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70 percent, whilescroll centrifuges may achieve final solids contents <strong>of</strong> 65 to 70 percent. Evaporation ponds <strong>and</strong>storage lagoons may be suitable <strong>for</strong> smaller treatment plants, but because they are l<strong>and</strong> intensive, maynot be applicable <strong>for</strong> large water systems.L<strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> LS treatment sludges is one possible disposal alternative. As discussedin section 4.3.2, total arsenic cannot exceed 41 mg/kg if sludges are to be applied with no restrictions.Sludges with arsenic concentrations between 41 <strong>and</strong> 75 mg/kg may be l<strong>and</strong> applied provided that thetotal loading does not exceed 41 kg per hectare.LS sludges will require dewatering prior to l<strong>and</strong>fill disposal. If the residuals pass the TCLPtest they may be disposed <strong>of</strong> in a sanitary l<strong>and</strong>fill. Otherwise, residuals must be disposed in ahazardous waste l<strong>and</strong>fill. However, hazardous waste l<strong>and</strong>fill disposal should only be used as a lastresort if waste fails the TCLP test which is unlikely given the findings <strong>of</strong> available studies. Testsconducted by the University <strong>of</strong> Colorado indicate that LS sludges will pass the TCLP test (AWWARF,1998). This finding is supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Bartley, et al. (1992).In the Bartley study, samples were taken from the waste sludges generated by four differentwater treatment plants <strong>and</strong> subjected to the TCLP test. Two <strong>of</strong> these systems relied on LS, <strong>and</strong> anotherused both C/F <strong>and</strong> LS processes. All three <strong>of</strong> these systems treated raw waters characterized byarsenic concentrations averaging less than 0.001 mg/L. The results <strong>of</strong> the TCLP tests conducted onthe waste residuals from these systems ranged from 0.007 to 0.039 mg/L–significantly below thecurrent criterion <strong>for</strong> treatment as hazardous waste (5.0 mg/L).4.4.6 Enhanced Lime S<strong>of</strong>teningEnhanced LS is a modified LS process wherein lime dosage is increased. Residuals generatedas a byproduct <strong>of</strong> this process are similar to those generated by a typical LS treatment process. Thequantity <strong>of</strong> sludge produced is a function <strong>of</strong> water hardness. As with LS, the use <strong>of</strong> enhanced LS <strong>for</strong>4-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!