11.07.2015 Views

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The source water at Plant D has the following critical characteristics:Parameter<strong>Arsenic</strong> (total)Average Source <strong>Water</strong> Results59.0 Fg/LpH 8.3Alkalinity 55.5 mg/L CaCO 3FluorideSulfate1.13 mg/L15 mg/LThe roughing tank treated 5,200 BV <strong>of</strong> water be<strong>for</strong>e breakthrough (effluent = influent). Thearsenic concentration in the effluent from the second tank was less than 2 Fg/L as it wasthroughout the run. <strong>Arsenic</strong> concentration was the only key parameter that varied to any extentduring the testing. The run length would be affected by pH <strong>and</strong> by the influent arsenicconcentration. The pH was consistent <strong>and</strong> represents the upper bound on the range <strong>of</strong>applicability <strong>for</strong> this cost equation. A run length <strong>of</strong> 5,200 BV was used as the run length <strong>for</strong>the range <strong>of</strong> 8 # pH # 8.3. Since influent arsenic concentrations <strong>for</strong> most systems affected bythe rule should be much lower than 59 Fg/L, this should be a very conservative run length <strong>for</strong>systems with lower arsenic concentrations <strong>and</strong>/or pH values at the lower end <strong>of</strong> the range.The effluent pH <strong>and</strong> effluent concentrations <strong>of</strong> alkalinity, fluoride <strong>and</strong> sulfate indicated almostno change from their value in the influent. Thus, the existing corrosion control should besufficient.The previous approach described in Appendix G <strong>of</strong> the November 1999 Technology <strong>and</strong> CostDocument (1) relied upon pilot-scale data from Severn-Trent (11). The study examinedarsenic removal over a pH range from pH 6 to pH 7.5 in a single column. The three runlengths derived from that data ranged from 16,500 BV <strong>and</strong> pH 7 to 3,000 BV at pH 8 <strong>for</strong> 10%breakthrough in a single column. Actual run lengths to 50% breakthrough in that study <strong>for</strong>natural pH 7.5 ranged from 9,400 to 13,000 BV based on mesh size. The data from the tw<strong>of</strong>ull-scale facilities (3) indicated that the roughing column could be operated almost completebreakthrough (effluent = influent) be<strong>for</strong>e concentrations in the effluent <strong>of</strong> the second columnexceeded 5% <strong>of</strong> the influent concentration. This data also indicates that a natural pH runD-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!