11.07.2015 Views

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.5.2 ChlorinationAs previously stated, chlorination can cause DBP <strong>for</strong>mation in source waters with high TOCconcentrations. Chlorination has also been shown to cause fouling in some membrane processes. Asa result, source water characteristics <strong>and</strong> downstream process needs should be thoroughly evaluatedwhen considering chlorination as an oxidation technology. Capital <strong>and</strong> O&M costs were developed<strong>for</strong> cylinder <strong>and</strong> tank feed chlorination systems at dosages <strong>of</strong> 1.5 mg/L. Similar to potassiumpermanganate systems, the VSS Model was used <strong>for</strong> calculating costs <strong>for</strong> the flows below 1 mgd, <strong>and</strong>the W/W Cost Model was used to estimate the capital <strong>and</strong> O&M costs <strong>for</strong> flows greater than 10 mgd.Linear regressions were used to estimate costs in the transition regions between the models, i.e., 1 to10 mgd. The following are some highlights <strong>of</strong> the system design used at the time <strong>of</strong> cost estimation:# For very small systems, chlorination is accomplished with a hypochlorite feed systemcapable <strong>of</strong> providing dosages to 10 mg/L as chlorine. The system is equipped with a 150gallon storage tank <strong>and</strong> utilizes a 15 percent sodium hypochlorite feed stock.# The VSS Model makes provisions <strong>for</strong> building (52.2 percent), fencing (60.5 percent), <strong>and</strong>road (41.4 percent) costs associated with chlorine addition. Housing costs are onlyneeded when the arsenic removal process is a centrally-managed point-<strong>of</strong>-use option.Otherwise, it is assumed that chlorination process would be housed in the same buildingas the larger central treatment process.# Capital costs were calculated <strong>for</strong> both with <strong>and</strong> without housing costs added.# Incremental labor requirements <strong>for</strong> O&M costs were assumed to be 1 hours per week.# For small systems, cylinder feed chlorination system capital <strong>and</strong> O&M costs wereestimated.It should be noted that some systems currently using chlorine <strong>for</strong> disinfection may be able tomodify existing chlorine feed systems to utilize chlorine as a preoxidant with significant capital costsavings. Capital <strong>and</strong> O&M cost curves <strong>and</strong> equations are presented in Figures 3-1 <strong>and</strong> 3-2.3-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!