Mortazavi, S., K. Volchek, A. Tremblay, F.H. Tezel <strong>and</strong> H. Whittaker (1995). “An Advanced Process<strong>for</strong> the <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>From</strong> Effluents,” Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Twelfth Technical Seminar<strong>of</strong> Chemical Spills, June 12-13, 1995, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 21-37.Muilenberg, T. (1997). “Micr<strong>of</strong>iltration Basics: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice,” Proceedings MembraneTechnology Conference, February 23-26, 1997, New Orleans, LA.New Mexico State University (1979). <strong>Water</strong> Treatment <strong>for</strong> Small Public Supplies - Report <strong>of</strong>Operation: Cuba, Carrizozo, La luz, San Jon, San Ysidro, Bluewater, Moriarty, Hagerman, LaCruces, NM.Nikolaidis, N.P., J. Lackovic <strong>and</strong> G. Dobbs (1998). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> Remediation Technology - AsRT,”Environmental Research Institute Technical Publication.Papadimas, S.P., Z.K. Chowdhury <strong>and</strong> M. Frey (1997). “Development <strong>of</strong> Treatment <strong>and</strong> Residual CostCurves <strong>for</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong>,” AWWA Annual Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, June1997.Pickering, K., <strong>and</strong> M.R. Wiesner (1993). “Cost Model <strong>for</strong> Low-Pressure Membrane Filtration,” J.Env. Eng., 119:5:772.Pontius, F.W. (1998). “New Horizons in Federal Regulation,” J. AWWA, 90:3:38-50.Raucher, R.S. (1994). Estimating the Cost <strong>of</strong> Compliance With <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards: A User’sGuide, AWWA, Washington.Reiber, S., G. Dostal, L. Onnen, J. McCafferty, W. Sund, <strong>and</strong> L. Andreasen (1997). Final Report:Groundwater Disinfection <strong>and</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> Concentration in the Fremont Distribution System,Report to USEPA, November 1997.Robinson, J. (1998). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> - Case Study <strong>of</strong> Full Scale Coagulation/Filtration Plant,”AWWA Inorganic Contaminants Workshop, San Antonio, TX, February 23-24, 1998.Rosenblum, E.R. <strong>and</strong> D.A. Clif<strong>for</strong>d (1984). The Equilibrium <strong>Arsenic</strong> Capacity <strong>of</strong> Activated Alumina,PB 84/10 527, NTIS, Springfield.SAIC, HDR (1994). Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> Treatment Workshop, USEPA, Office <strong>of</strong> Ground <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>, January 1994.SAIC (1998). Technolologies <strong>and</strong> <strong>Costs</strong> <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Radon from <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>, DraftReport, Prepared <strong>for</strong> USEPA Office <strong>of</strong> Ground <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>.SAIC (1999). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Central Treatment Options as Small System Treatment <strong>Technologies</strong> -Technology Cost Estimates, Prepared <strong>for</strong> USEPA Office <strong>of</strong> Ground <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>.Scott, K.N, et al. (1994). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> Using Elevated Dosages <strong>of</strong> Ferric Chloride <strong>and</strong> Alumat a Full-Scale Conventional Treatment Plant,” Proceedings AWWA Annual Conference, SanFrancisco, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.6-8
Scott, K., J. Green, H.D. Do <strong>and</strong> S.J. McLean (1995). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> by Coagulation,” J. AWWA,4:114-126.Sethi, S. <strong>and</strong> M.R. Wiesner (1995). “Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> Cost Modeling <strong>of</strong> Ultrafiltration,”J. Env. Eng.,121:12:883.Shen, Y.S. (1973). “Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> from <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>,” J. AWWA, 8:543-548.Simms, J. <strong>and</strong> F. Azizian (1997). “Pilot Plant Trials on the <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> from Potable <strong>Water</strong>Using Activated Alumina,” Proceedings AWWA <strong>Water</strong> Quality Technology Conference,November 9-12, 1997.Simms, J., J. Upton, <strong>and</strong> J. Barnes. (2000). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> Studies <strong>and</strong> the Design <strong>of</strong> a 20,000m 3 Per Day Plant in the UK” AWWA Inorganic Contaminants Workshop, Albuquerque, NM,February 27-29, 2000.Sorg, T.J. <strong>and</strong> G.S. Logsdon (1978). “Treatment Technology to Meet the Interim Primary <strong>Drinking</strong><strong>Water</strong> Regulations <strong>for</strong> Inorganics: Part 2,” J. AWWA, 7:379-392.Sorg, T.J. (1990). “Methods <strong>of</strong> Removing <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Contaminants <strong>and</strong> Their Limitations:Inorganics <strong>and</strong> Radionuclides,” USEPA <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Research Division, Cincinnati, Ohio,PB91-162792.Stewart, H.T. <strong>and</strong> K.J. Kessler (1991). “Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> by Activated AluminaFiltration at a Small Community Public <strong>Water</strong> Supply,” Journal <strong>of</strong> New Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong> WorksAssociation, 105:179-199.Subramanian, K.S., T. Viraraghavan, T. Phommavong <strong>and</strong> S. Tanjore (1997). “Manganese Greens<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> in <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>,” <strong>Water</strong> Quality Research Journal Canada,32:3:551-561.Thomson, B.M. <strong>and</strong> M. O’Grady (1998). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Point-<strong>of</strong>-Use <strong>Water</strong> Treatment Systems, SanYsidro, New Mexico, Final Report to USEPA, February 1998.Vickers, J.C., A. Braghetta, <strong>and</strong> R.A. Hawkins (1997). “Bench Scale Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Micr<strong>of</strong>ilitration<strong>for</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Particles <strong>and</strong> Natural Organic Matter,” Proceedings Membrane TechnologyConference, February 23-26, 1997, New Orleans, LA.Wageman, R. (1978). “Some Theoretical Aspects <strong>of</strong> Stability <strong>and</strong> Solubility <strong>of</strong> Inorganic <strong>Arsenic</strong> inthe Freshwater Environment,” <strong>Water</strong> Research, 12:139.Wang, L., T. Sorg, <strong>and</strong> A. Chen. (2000). “<strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> by Full Scale Ion Exchange <strong>and</strong>Activated Alumina Treatment Systems.” AWWA Inorganic Contaminants Workshop,Albuquerque, NM, February 27-29, 2000.WMA, Inc. (1994). Assembly <strong>of</strong> Compliance Decision Tree <strong>for</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong>, Correspondence with Ms.Heather Shank-Givens, EPA, Office <strong>of</strong> Ground <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong>, November 1994.6-9
- Page 1:
United StatesEnvironmental Protecti
- Page 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis document was pr
- Page 8 and 9:
2.5.7 Reverse Osmosis .............
- Page 10 and 11:
5.0 POINT-OF-ENTRY/POINT-OF-USE TRE
- Page 12 and 13:
LIST OF FIGURES2-1 Pressure Driven
- Page 14 and 15:
LIST OF ACRONYMSAAAWWAAWWARFBLSBVC/
- Page 16 and 17:
POUpoint-of-useppbparts per billion
- Page 18 and 19:
# Alternative treatment processes s
- Page 20 and 21:
This page was intentionally left bl
- Page 23 and 24:
ends up as ferric hydroxide. In alu
- Page 25 and 26:
Optimization Hierarchy for Coagulat
- Page 27 and 28:
Substantial arsenic removal has bee
- Page 29 and 30:
Vickers et al. (1997) reported that
- Page 31 and 32:
was reduced to 0.05 mg/L when the i
- Page 33 and 34:
Field StudiesSurveys of lime soften
- Page 35 and 36:
Effect of pHpH may have significant
- Page 37 and 38:
RegenerationRegeneration of AA beds
- Page 39 and 40:
een developed provide important inf
- Page 41 and 42:
applicability of IX at a particular
- Page 43 and 44:
TABLE 2-1Typical IX Resins for Arse
- Page 45 and 46:
solution strength. Arsenic elutes r
- Page 47 and 48:
2.4.12 Typical Design ParametersThr
- Page 49 and 50:
2.5.2 Important Factors for Membran
- Page 51 and 52:
arsenic size distribution to correl
- Page 53 and 54:
AWWARF (1998) also performed UF pil
- Page 55 and 56:
presumably due to changes in electr
- Page 57 and 58:
RO performance is adversely affecte
- Page 59 and 60:
TABLE 2-10Arsenic Removal with RO a
- Page 61 and 62:
eversal is the decreased potential
- Page 63 and 64:
2.6 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES2.6.1 I
- Page 65 and 66:
20 mg As per gram of iron was remov
- Page 67 and 68:
The most significant weakness of th
- Page 69 and 70:
3.0 TECHNOLOGY COSTS3.1 INTRODUCTIO
- Page 71 and 72:
included in the estimates presented
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 3-3Water Model Capital Cost B
- Page 75 and 76:
3.2.3 Implementing TDP Recommended
- Page 77 and 78:
sources. The September 1998 index v
- Page 79 and 80:
Amortization, or capital recovery,
- Page 81 and 82:
3.3 ADDITIONAL CAPITAL COSTSThe cos
- Page 83 and 84:
PilotingThe Technology Design Panel
- Page 85 and 86:
The 1993 Technology and Cost Docume
- Page 87 and 88:
cause disinfection by-product (DBP)
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3-1Pre-oxidation - 1.5 mg/L
- Page 91 and 92:
3.6 PRECIPITATIVE PROCESSES3.6.1 Co
- Page 93 and 94:
enhanced coagulation treatment plan
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 3-4Enhanced Coagulation/Filt
- Page 97 and 98:
Small Systems (Less than 1 mgd)The
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 3-6Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 101 and 102:
3.6.6 Enhanced Lime SofteningEnhanc
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 3-8Enhanced Lime SofteningO&
- Page 105 and 106:
3. Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT) is
- Page 107 and 108:
For design flows greater than 1 mgd
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 3-9Activated AluminaCapital
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 3-11Activated Alumina (pH 8
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 3-13Activated Alumina (pH Ad
- Page 115 and 116:
3.7.2 Granular Ferric HydroxideGran
- Page 117 and 118:
6. The capital costs include a redu
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 3-15Bed Volumes to Arsenic B
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 3-17Anion Exchange (< 20 mg/
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 3-19Anion Exchange (20-50 mg
- Page 125 and 126:
quality feed stream and often requi
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 3-20Greensand FiltrationCapi
- Page 129 and 130:
3.11 COMPARISON OF COSTSThe April 1
- Page 131 and 132:
4.0 RESIDUALS HANDLING AND DISPOSAL
- Page 133 and 134:
mechanical dewatering processes. Wh
- Page 135 and 136:
Storage lagoons are best suited for
- Page 137 and 138: the current Industrial Pretreatment
- Page 139 and 140: 4.3.3 Dewatered Sludge Land Applica
- Page 141 and 142: usually determined by the Paint Fil
- Page 143 and 144: for arsenic toxicity by a substanti
- Page 145 and 146: The solids content of the backwash
- Page 147 and 148: carbonate hardness removal produces
- Page 149 and 150: Domestic sewage means untreated san
- Page 151 and 152: 4.4.10 Reverse OsmosisReverse osmos
- Page 153 and 154: Figure 4-1Anion Exchange (< 20 mg/L
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 4-3Anion Exchange (20-50 mg/
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 4-5Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 4-7Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 161 and 162: Figure 4-9Activated Alumina (pH 7 -
- Page 163 and 164: Figure 4-11Activated Alumina (pH Ad
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 4-13Greensand FiltrationWast
- Page 167 and 168: 5.0 POINT-OF-ENTRY/POINT-OF-USE TRE
- Page 169 and 170: chromatographic peaking, which occu
- Page 171 and 172: 5.3.1 Case Study 1: Fairbanks, Alas
- Page 173 and 174: Manufacturer and laboratory data su
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 5-2POU Reverse OsmosisO&M Co
- Page 177 and 178: # Installation time - 1 hour unskil
- Page 179 and 180: Figure 5-3POU Activated AluminaTota
- Page 181 and 182: 6.0 REFERENCESAmy, G.L. and P. Bran
- Page 183 and 184: Cooperative Research Centres for Wa
- Page 185 and 186: Fuller, C.C., J.A. Davis, G.W. Zell
- Page 187: Le, X.C., and M. Ma (1998). “Dete
- Page 191: Appendix AVery Small Systems Capita
- Page 194 and 195: Table A4 - VSS Document Capital Cos
- Page 197 and 198: Table B1.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 199 and 200: Table B3.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 201 and 202: Table B5.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 203 and 204: Table B7.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 205 and 206: Table B9.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 207 and 208: Table B11.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 209 and 210: Table B13.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 211: Appendix CW/W Cost Model Capital Co
- Page 214 and 215: Table C2.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 216 and 217: Table C4.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 218 and 219: Table C6.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 220 and 221: Table C8.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 222 and 223: Table C10.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 224 and 225: Table C12.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 226 and 227: Table C14.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 228 and 229: Table C16.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 230 and 231: Table C18.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 232 and 233: Table C20.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 234 and 235: Table C22.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 236 and 237: Table C24.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 238 and 239:
Table C26.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 240 and 241:
This page was intentionally left bl
- Page 243 and 244:
APPENDIX D: BASIS FOR REVISED ACTIV
- Page 245 and 246:
Company case study is 18 minutes (2
- Page 247 and 248:
egressed against their respective v
- Page 249 and 250:
costs for small systems is as follo
- Page 251 and 252:
were based on $40/sq ft). The proce
- Page 253 and 254:
Basis. Capital cost components incl
- Page 255 and 256:
The source water at Plant D has the
- Page 257 and 258:
equation y = (2*10 -8 )x 2 + 0.0002
- Page 259 and 260:
The maximum run length is 18,500 be
- Page 261 and 262:
Since the available arsenic capacit
- Page 263 and 264:
If the first column can be operated
- Page 265 and 266:
which includes lighting, ventilatio
- Page 267 and 268:
disposal costs, if needed, are cove
- Page 269:
Appendix EBasis for Revised Anion E
- Page 272 and 273:
2. The estimated cost of the anion
- Page 274 and 275:
9. The capital costs have been esti
- Page 276 and 277:
Thus, the cost of a road and fence
- Page 278 and 279:
length when sulfate is at or below
- Page 280 and 281:
the labor rates for both large and
- Page 282 and 283:
2. US EPA. Technologies and Costs f
- Page 284:
This page was intentionally left bl