- Page 1: United StatesEnvironmental Protecti
- Page 5: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis document was pr
- Page 8 and 9: 2.5.7 Reverse Osmosis .............
- Page 10 and 11: 5.0 POINT-OF-ENTRY/POINT-OF-USE TRE
- Page 12 and 13: LIST OF FIGURES2-1 Pressure Driven
- Page 14 and 15: LIST OF ACRONYMSAAAWWAAWWARFBLSBVC/
- Page 16 and 17: POUpoint-of-useppbparts per billion
- Page 18 and 19: # Alternative treatment processes s
- Page 20 and 21: This page was intentionally left bl
- Page 23 and 24: ends up as ferric hydroxide. In alu
- Page 25 and 26: Optimization Hierarchy for Coagulat
- Page 27 and 28: Substantial arsenic removal has bee
- Page 29 and 30: Vickers et al. (1997) reported that
- Page 31: was reduced to 0.05 mg/L when the i
- Page 35 and 36: Effect of pHpH may have significant
- Page 37 and 38: RegenerationRegeneration of AA beds
- Page 39 and 40: een developed provide important inf
- Page 41 and 42: applicability of IX at a particular
- Page 43 and 44: TABLE 2-1Typical IX Resins for Arse
- Page 45 and 46: solution strength. Arsenic elutes r
- Page 47 and 48: 2.4.12 Typical Design ParametersThr
- Page 49 and 50: 2.5.2 Important Factors for Membran
- Page 51 and 52: arsenic size distribution to correl
- Page 53 and 54: AWWARF (1998) also performed UF pil
- Page 55 and 56: presumably due to changes in electr
- Page 57 and 58: RO performance is adversely affecte
- Page 59 and 60: TABLE 2-10Arsenic Removal with RO a
- Page 61 and 62: eversal is the decreased potential
- Page 63 and 64: 2.6 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES2.6.1 I
- Page 65 and 66: 20 mg As per gram of iron was remov
- Page 67 and 68: The most significant weakness of th
- Page 69 and 70: 3.0 TECHNOLOGY COSTS3.1 INTRODUCTIO
- Page 71 and 72: included in the estimates presented
- Page 73 and 74: Table 3-3Water Model Capital Cost B
- Page 75 and 76: 3.2.3 Implementing TDP Recommended
- Page 77 and 78: sources. The September 1998 index v
- Page 79 and 80: Amortization, or capital recovery,
- Page 81 and 82: 3.3 ADDITIONAL CAPITAL COSTSThe cos
- Page 83 and 84:
PilotingThe Technology Design Panel
- Page 85 and 86:
The 1993 Technology and Cost Docume
- Page 87 and 88:
cause disinfection by-product (DBP)
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3-1Pre-oxidation - 1.5 mg/L
- Page 91 and 92:
3.6 PRECIPITATIVE PROCESSES3.6.1 Co
- Page 93 and 94:
enhanced coagulation treatment plan
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 3-4Enhanced Coagulation/Filt
- Page 97 and 98:
Small Systems (Less than 1 mgd)The
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 3-6Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 101 and 102:
3.6.6 Enhanced Lime SofteningEnhanc
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 3-8Enhanced Lime SofteningO&
- Page 105 and 106:
3. Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT) is
- Page 107 and 108:
For design flows greater than 1 mgd
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 3-9Activated AluminaCapital
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 3-11Activated Alumina (pH 8
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 3-13Activated Alumina (pH Ad
- Page 115 and 116:
3.7.2 Granular Ferric HydroxideGran
- Page 117 and 118:
6. The capital costs include a redu
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 3-15Bed Volumes to Arsenic B
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 3-17Anion Exchange (< 20 mg/
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 3-19Anion Exchange (20-50 mg
- Page 125 and 126:
quality feed stream and often requi
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 3-20Greensand FiltrationCapi
- Page 129 and 130:
3.11 COMPARISON OF COSTSThe April 1
- Page 131 and 132:
4.0 RESIDUALS HANDLING AND DISPOSAL
- Page 133 and 134:
mechanical dewatering processes. Wh
- Page 135 and 136:
Storage lagoons are best suited for
- Page 137 and 138:
the current Industrial Pretreatment
- Page 139 and 140:
4.3.3 Dewatered Sludge Land Applica
- Page 141 and 142:
usually determined by the Paint Fil
- Page 143 and 144:
for arsenic toxicity by a substanti
- Page 145 and 146:
The solids content of the backwash
- Page 147 and 148:
carbonate hardness removal produces
- Page 149 and 150:
Domestic sewage means untreated san
- Page 151 and 152:
4.4.10 Reverse OsmosisReverse osmos
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 4-1Anion Exchange (< 20 mg/L
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 4-3Anion Exchange (20-50 mg/
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 4-5Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 159 and 160:
Figure 4-7Coagulation Assisted Micr
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 4-9Activated Alumina (pH 7 -
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4-11Activated Alumina (pH Ad
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 4-13Greensand FiltrationWast
- Page 167 and 168:
5.0 POINT-OF-ENTRY/POINT-OF-USE TRE
- Page 169 and 170:
chromatographic peaking, which occu
- Page 171 and 172:
5.3.1 Case Study 1: Fairbanks, Alas
- Page 173 and 174:
Manufacturer and laboratory data su
- Page 175 and 176:
Figure 5-2POU Reverse OsmosisO&M Co
- Page 177 and 178:
# Installation time - 1 hour unskil
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 5-3POU Activated AluminaTota
- Page 181 and 182:
6.0 REFERENCESAmy, G.L. and P. Bran
- Page 183 and 184:
Cooperative Research Centres for Wa
- Page 185 and 186:
Fuller, C.C., J.A. Davis, G.W. Zell
- Page 187 and 188:
Le, X.C., and M. Ma (1998). “Dete
- Page 189 and 190:
Scott, K., J. Green, H.D. Do and S.
- Page 191:
Appendix AVery Small Systems Capita
- Page 194 and 195:
Table A4 - VSS Document Capital Cos
- Page 197 and 198:
Table B1.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 199 and 200:
Table B3.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 201 and 202:
Table B5.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 203 and 204:
Table B7.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 205 and 206:
Table B9.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 207 and 208:
Table B11.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 209 and 210:
Table B13.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 211:
Appendix CW/W Cost Model Capital Co
- Page 214 and 215:
Table C2.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 216 and 217:
Table C4.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 218 and 219:
Table C6.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 220 and 221:
Table C8.1 - Base Costs Obtained fr
- Page 222 and 223:
Table C10.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 224 and 225:
Table C12.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 226 and 227:
Table C14.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 228 and 229:
Table C16.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 230 and 231:
Table C18.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 232 and 233:
Table C20.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 234 and 235:
Table C22.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 236 and 237:
Table C24.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 238 and 239:
Table C26.1 - Base Costs Obtained f
- Page 240 and 241:
This page was intentionally left bl
- Page 243 and 244:
APPENDIX D: BASIS FOR REVISED ACTIV
- Page 245 and 246:
Company case study is 18 minutes (2
- Page 247 and 248:
egressed against their respective v
- Page 249 and 250:
costs for small systems is as follo
- Page 251 and 252:
were based on $40/sq ft). The proce
- Page 253 and 254:
Basis. Capital cost components incl
- Page 255 and 256:
The source water at Plant D has the
- Page 257 and 258:
equation y = (2*10 -8 )x 2 + 0.0002
- Page 259 and 260:
The maximum run length is 18,500 be
- Page 261 and 262:
Since the available arsenic capacit
- Page 263 and 264:
If the first column can be operated
- Page 265 and 266:
which includes lighting, ventilatio
- Page 267 and 268:
disposal costs, if needed, are cove
- Page 269:
Appendix EBasis for Revised Anion E
- Page 272 and 273:
2. The estimated cost of the anion
- Page 274 and 275:
9. The capital costs have been esti
- Page 276 and 277:
Thus, the cost of a road and fence
- Page 278 and 279:
length when sulfate is at or below
- Page 280 and 281:
the labor rates for both large and
- Page 282 and 283:
2. US EPA. Technologies and Costs f
- Page 284:
This page was intentionally left bl