11.07.2015 Views

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.0 POINT-OF-ENTRY/POINT-OF-USE TREATMENT OPTIONS5.1 INTRODUCTIONCentralized treatment is not always a feasible treatment option, <strong>for</strong> example, in areas whereeach home has a private well or where centralized treatment is cost prohibitive. In these instances,point-<strong>of</strong>-entry (POE) <strong>and</strong> point-<strong>of</strong>-use (POU) treatment options may be acceptable treatmentalternatives. POE <strong>and</strong> POU systems <strong>of</strong>fer ease <strong>of</strong> installation, simplify operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance,<strong>and</strong> generally have lower capital costs (Fox, 1989). These systems may also reduce engineering, legal<strong>and</strong> other fees typically associated with centralized treatment options. Use <strong>of</strong> POE <strong>and</strong> POU systemsdoes not reduce the need <strong>for</strong> a well-maintained water distribution system. In fact, increasedmonitoring may be necessary to ensure that the treatment units are operating properly.Home water treatment can consist <strong>of</strong> either whole-house or single faucet treatment. Wholehouse,or POE treatment is necessary when exposure to the contaminant by modes other thanconsumption is a concern. POU treatment is preferred when treated water is needed only <strong>for</strong> drinking<strong>and</strong> cooking purposes. POU treatment usually involves single-tap treatment.Section 1412(b)(4)(E) <strong>of</strong> the 1996 Safe <strong>Drinking</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Act (SDWA) Amendments requiresthe EPA to issue a list <strong>of</strong> technologies that achieve compliance with MCLs established under the act.This list must contain technologies <strong>for</strong> each NPDWR <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the small public water systemscategories listed below:# Population <strong>of</strong> more than 50, but less than 500;# Population <strong>of</strong> 500 or more, but less than 3,300; <strong>and</strong># Population <strong>of</strong> 3,300 or more, but less than 10,000.The SDWA identifies POE <strong>and</strong> POU treatment units as potentially af<strong>for</strong>dable technologies, butstipulates that POE <strong>and</strong> POU treatment systems “shall be owned, controlled <strong>and</strong> maintained by thepublic water system, or by a person under contract with the public water system to ensure properoperation <strong>and</strong> compliance with the maximum contaminant level or treatment technique <strong>and</strong> equippedwith mechanical warnings to ensure that customers are automatically notified <strong>of</strong> operationalproblems.”Research has shown that POE <strong>and</strong> POU devices can be an effective means <strong>of</strong> removing arsenicfrom potable water (Fox <strong>and</strong> Sorg, 1987; Fox, 1989). Influent arsenic concentration <strong>and</strong> other source5-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!