11.07.2015 Views

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RF Issues 205Table 4-8Minimum total degradation for different transmission schemes, BER = 10 −2Transmission scheme Downlink, K = 32 Downlink, K = 64 Uplink<strong>MC</strong>-CDMA withoutpre-distortionDS-CDMA withoutpre-distortion<strong>MC</strong>-CDMA withpre-distortionSSPA TWTA SSPA TWTA SSPA TWTA2.6 dB 4.0 dB 3.2 dB 4.7 dB 1.25 dB 3.0 dB5.0 dB 5.5 dB 5.3 dB 5.8 dB 0.9 dB 1.1 dB– 2.5 dB – 3.1 dB – 0.9 dBrespect to a non-pre-distorted scheme using the TWTA. Similar gains for the downlinkcase for different BER cases have been obtained.In Table 4-8 the minimum total degradations TD min at a BER of 10 −2 for <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA<strong>and</strong> DS-CDMA systems are summarized. The lower degradation of the <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA systemfor the downlink is due to its lower peak signal amplitude compared to the DS-CDMAsignal <strong>and</strong> to the presence of frequency interleaving. In the case of TWTAs, the gain providedby pre-distortion for <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA is more than 1.5 dB for both the uplink <strong>and</strong> thedownlink. <strong>From</strong> this table we conclude that with respect to non-linearities <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA isa good choice for the downlink <strong>and</strong> <strong>MC</strong>-DS-CDMA with a small number of sub-carrierscould be adequate for the uplink.Appropriate selection of spreading codesAs we have seen before, <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA is sensitive to amplifier non-linearity effects. Wehave used Walsh–Hadamard codes rather than Gold codes for the downlink in the case ofmulti-carrier transmission. In this section we highlight the effects of the spreading codeselection <strong>and</strong> detail the appropriate choice for the uplink <strong>and</strong> the downlink [66, 69].In Section 2.1.4.2, upper bounds for the PAPR of different spreading codes have beenpresented for <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA systems. Both uplink <strong>and</strong> downlink have been analyzed <strong>and</strong> it isshown that different codes are optimum with respect to the PAPR for up- <strong>and</strong> downlinks.Exemplary values for these upper bounds are given in Table 4-9 for different spreadingcode lengths in the uplink. As shown in Table 4-9, Zadoff–Chu codes have the lowestPAPR for the uplink.Table 4-9 PAPR upper bounds for differentspreading codes in the uplink<strong>Spread</strong>ing code L = 16 L = 64Walsh–Hadamard 32 128Gold ∼ 15.5 ∼ 31.5Golay 4 4Zadoff–Chu 2 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!