11.07.2015 Views

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206 Implementation IssuesFor the downlink, the simulation results given in Reference [66] show that for differentnumbers of active users <strong>and</strong> a given spreading factor the PAPR in the case ofWalsh–Hadamard codes decreases as the number of users increases, while for other codes(e.g. Golay codes) it increases. For instance, for a spreading factor of L = 16, in the caseof Walsh–Hadamard codes the PAPR is equal to 7.5 <strong>and</strong> for Golay codes it is about 26.The simulation results given in Reference [66] confirm that for the downlink the bestchoice, also for the minimization of multiple access interference, are Walsh–Hadamardcodes.4.7.3 Narrowb<strong>and</strong> Interference Rejection in <strong>MC</strong>-CDMAThe spread spectrum technique in combination with rake receivers is an interestingapproach to remove the effects of interference <strong>and</strong> multi-path propagation [87]. In orderto combat strong narrowb<strong>and</strong> interference different techniques of notch filtering in thetime domain (based on the LMS algorithm) <strong>and</strong> in the transform domain (based on theFFT) have been analyzed that provide promising results for spread spectrum systems [57].However, in a frequency- <strong>and</strong> time-selective fading channel with coherent detection, itshigh performance is no longer guaranteed without perfect knowledge about the impulseresponse of the channel <strong>and</strong> without performing an optimum detection.Another interesting approach is based on the <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA technique [21]. The interferencecan be considered as narrowb<strong>and</strong> multitone sine interference. A method forevaluating both interference <strong>and</strong> the fading process based on frequency domain analysisis studied in the following. The estimated interference <strong>and</strong> fading process is used forweighting each received chip before de-spreading.The narrowb<strong>and</strong> interference can be modeled as consisting of a number of Q continuoussine wave tones [46]Q−1∑Int(t) = A m cos(2πf m t + φ m ), (4.96)m=0where A m is the amplitude of the interferer at frequency f m <strong>and</strong> φ m is a r<strong>and</strong>omphase.4.7.3.1 Interference EstimationThe interference estimation in multi-carrier systems can be based on the transmission of anull symbol, i.e. one <strong>OFDM</strong> symbol with a non-modulated signal (see Section 4.2.1). Atthe receiver side this null symbol contains only interference <strong>and</strong> noise. The power of theinterference Int l in each sub-carrier l can be estimated by performing an FFT operationon this null symbol. The estimated interference power is used for weighting the receivedsub-carriers.However, interference can also be detected without the use of a null symbol. It can bedone, for instance, by performing an envelope detection of the received signal after theFFT operation. Of course, this method is not accurate, since it suffers from the presenceof fading <strong>and</strong> ICI.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!