11.07.2015 Views

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA <strong>and</strong> <strong>MC</strong>-DS-CDMAinitial detection stage, the data symbols of all K active users are detected in parallel bysingle-user detection, i.e.ˆd (k)[0] = Q{c (k)∗ G (k)[0] r T },k = 0,...,K − 1, (2.50)where G (k)[0] denotes the equalization coefficients assigned to the initial stage. The followingdetection stages work iteratively by using the decisions of the previous stage toreconstruct the interfering contribution in the received signal. The obtained interferenceis subtracted, i.e. cancelled from the received signal, <strong>and</strong> the data detection is performedagain with reduced multiple access interference. Thus, the second <strong>and</strong> further detectionstages apply⎧ ⎛⎞⎪⎨K−1ˆd (k) [j] = Q c (k)∗ G (k)[j] ⎜⎝ r − ∑H (g) d (g) [j−1] c (g) ⎟⎠T ⎫ ⎪ ⎬, j = 1,...,J it , (2.51)⎪ ⎭⎪⎩g≠kg=0where, except for the final stage, the detection has to be applied for all K users.Parallel interference cancellation can be applied with different detection strategies in theiterations. Starting with EGC in each iteration [17, 18] various combinations have beenproposed [6, 25, 30]. Promising results are obtained with MMSE equalization adaptedin the first iteration to the actual system load <strong>and</strong> in all further iterations to MMSEequalization adapted to the single-user case [24]. The application of MRC seems theoreticallyto be of advantage for the second <strong>and</strong> further detection stages, since MRC isthe optimum detection technique in the multiple access interference free case, i.e. in thesingle-user case. However, if one or more decision errors are made, MRC has a poorperformance [25].Successive Interference CancellationSuccessive interference cancellation detects <strong>and</strong> subtracts the interfering signals in theorder of the interfering signal power. First, the strongest interferer is cancelled, beforethe second strongest interferer is detected <strong>and</strong> subtracted, i.e.ˆd (k) [j] = Q {c (k)∗ G (k) [j] (r − H (g) (d (g)[j−1] c (g) )) T }, (2.52)where g is the strongest interferer in the iteration j,j = 1,...,J it . This procedure iscontinued until a predefined stop criterion applies. Successive interference cancellation issuitable for systems with large power variations between the interferers [6].Soft Interference CancellationInterference cancellation can use reliability information about the detected interferencein the iterative process. These schemes can be without [41] <strong>and</strong> with [21, 28] channeldecoding in the iterative process, <strong>and</strong> are termed soft interference cancellation. If reliabilityinformation about the detected interference is taken into account in the cancellationscheme, the performance of the iterative scheme can be improved since error propagationcan be reduced compared to schemes with hard decided feedback. The block diagramof an <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA receiver with soft interference cancellation is illustrated in Figure 2-8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!