11.07.2015 Views

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 Additional Techniques for Capacity <strong>and</strong> Flexibility Enhancementa Rayleigh fading channel. It is important to note that the performance of <strong>OFDM</strong>-CDMis comparable to the performance of a fully loaded <strong>MC</strong>-CDMA scheme in the downlink<strong>and</strong> that the performance of <strong>OFDM</strong> is comparable to the performance of <strong>OFDM</strong>Aor <strong>MC</strong>-TDMA with perfect interleaving. The transmission b<strong>and</strong>width of the systems isB = 2 MHz <strong>and</strong> the carrier frequency is located at 2 GHz. The number of sub-carriersis 512. The guard interval duration is 20 µs. As channel codes, punctured convolutionalcodes with memory 6 <strong>and</strong> variable code rate R between 1/3 <strong>and</strong> 4/5 are applied. QPSK isused for symbol mapping. The depth of the interleaver is equal to 24 subsequent <strong>OFDM</strong>symbols, so that time <strong>and</strong> frequency interleaving is applied. SFBC is realized with M = 2transmit antennas. There is no correlation between the antennas in the space–frequencyblock coded <strong>OFDM</strong> system. In the case of <strong>OFDM</strong>-CDM, short Hadamard codes of lengthL = 8 are applied for spreading. The mobile radio channel is modeled as an uncorrelatedRayleigh fading channel, assuming perfect interleaving in the frequency <strong>and</strong> timedirection.In Figure 6-22, the BER versus the SNR per bit is shown for space–frequency blockcoding in <strong>OFDM</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>OFDM</strong>-CDM systems. The results are presented for <strong>OFDM</strong>-CDMwith different single-symbol detection techniques. No FEC coding is used. The correspondingresults without SFBC are shown in Figure 2-14.10 010 −110 −2BER10 −310 −4MRCEGCZFMMSE eq.<strong>OFDM</strong>10 −50246810E b/N 0in dB1214161820Figure 6-22 BER versus SNR for space–frequency block coding applied to <strong>OFDM</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>OFDM</strong>-CDM with different single-symbol detection techniques: no FEC coding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!