12.07.2015 Views

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Religion</strong>/<strong>Spirituality</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mood Disorders 99the behavioral, cognitive, affective, <strong>and</strong> motivationaldimensions. The behavioral dimensionperta<strong>in</strong>s to organized religious behavior suchas church attendance as well as nonorganizedreligious behavior such as private prayer. Thecognitive dimension perta<strong>in</strong>s to religiousbeliefs <strong>and</strong> convictions <strong>and</strong> traditions ofreligious beliefs represent<strong>in</strong>g the context ofsocialization. The motivational dimensionperta<strong>in</strong>s to the relative importance or salienceof religion <strong>in</strong> personal life. Here, one conceptoften emerges <strong>in</strong> the literature: that is, <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sicreligious motivation def<strong>in</strong>ed as the extent towhich people live from with<strong>in</strong> their religion,with faith as a supreme value <strong>in</strong> its own right,permeat<strong>in</strong>g life with motivation <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g.Another variation is extr<strong>in</strong>sic religious motivation,def<strong>in</strong>ed as the utilitarian type of religiousness,useful to the self <strong>in</strong> grant<strong>in</strong>g safety<strong>and</strong> social st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.With respect to the relationship betweenreligiousness <strong>and</strong> depression (an affectivedisorder), one may assume that the affectivedimension of religiousness is of crucial importance.This affective dimension, however, didnot receive much attention <strong>in</strong> empirical studiesuntil recently. Glock (6) conceptualizedthe affective dimension as religious experience .Although un<strong>in</strong>tended by Glock, the term experiencebears a connotation of relatively eccentricor, at any rate, very private emotions, as arel<strong>in</strong>ked to conversion, mysticism, or exaltation.These sudden emotions may come up less <strong>in</strong>daily life <strong>and</strong> presumably do not apply to allreligious believers. Thus, the question rema<strong>in</strong>sas to how basic religious feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> commonlife should be <strong>in</strong>terpreted.From a psychodynamic perspective, the affectivedoma<strong>in</strong> of religiousness also <strong>in</strong>cludesobject-relational aspects of the God image asconceptualized by Ana-Maria Rizzuto.(7) Objectrelations are ongo<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ternaliz<strong>in</strong>g representationsof relationships with significant others,especially with regard to the emotional functionsof the relationships. Rizzuto elaborated onpsychoanalytic ideas on the mental representationof the relationship with God. This specialtype of object relation bears some resemblanceto relationships with early attachment figures,but the God object relation also firmly relates tocultural traditions.(8) The God object relationor God image may nurture a sense of basic trust,but can also arouse a sense of awe, anxiety, discontent,or anger.Another doma<strong>in</strong> of religiousness perta<strong>in</strong>s toreligious cop<strong>in</strong>g. Initially, the conceptualizationof religious cop<strong>in</strong>g followed fairly r<strong>and</strong>om patterns.Pargament, (9) however, contributed to adeeper underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g. He dist<strong>in</strong>guished betweenreligious dest<strong>in</strong>ations – objects of significancerelated to the sacred – <strong>and</strong> religious pathways –religious attitudes <strong>and</strong> behaviors. Pargamentargued that religious cop<strong>in</strong>g is determ<strong>in</strong>ed byhow an <strong>in</strong>dividual either conserves or transformsreligious dest<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>and</strong> religious pathways.By no means does religiousness represent amonolithic concept. It <strong>in</strong>volves a system withvarious dimensions, various aspects with<strong>in</strong> eachdimension, <strong>and</strong> a range of positions <strong>and</strong> varietiesfor each aspect. Moreover, aspects of religiousnessnot only belong to various dimensions, theycan also change over time. Of course the aspectsof religiousness are <strong>in</strong>terrelated, but here aga<strong>in</strong>a range of comb<strong>in</strong>ations can be discerned. Oneshould bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that statements about associationsbetween religiousness <strong>and</strong> mental healthalways require specification about the dimensionsor specific aspects of religiousness.All the aspects of religiousness can be assumedto act as factors related to depression <strong>in</strong> variousways rang<strong>in</strong>g from vulnerability factors to recovery-promot<strong>in</strong>gfactors. The <strong>in</strong>tegral exam<strong>in</strong>ation ofthe relationship between religiousness <strong>and</strong> depressioncan thus be depicted as a matrix, a chessboardwith numerous comb<strong>in</strong>ations (Table 8.1). In thecolumns, the types of factors related to depressioncan be dist<strong>in</strong>guished, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the rows, thedimensions of religiousness appear with theirma<strong>in</strong> aspects. For example, religious cognitionssuch as the conviction that every human carriesguilt throughout life may give rise to exaggeratedfeel<strong>in</strong>gs of guilt <strong>in</strong> times of depression, or even toreligious delusions about trespasses <strong>in</strong>terpretedas hav<strong>in</strong>g committed the unforgivable s<strong>in</strong>. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!