12.07.2015 Views

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 Pierre-Yves Br<strong>and</strong>t, Claude-Alex<strong>and</strong>re Fournier, <strong>and</strong> Sylvia Mohrcan produce strange manifestations <strong>in</strong> whichsubjects do not recognize themselves.(12)In summary, the attachment relationship is afoundation <strong>and</strong> a vector for the <strong>in</strong>ternalizationof the parental figures. It responds to a primaryneed. It is on the basis of this maternal function,later replaced by others, that the secondary<strong>and</strong> the partial identifications develop, allow<strong>in</strong>gaccess to the symbolization processes (communicationcodes, access to language). In this way, the<strong>in</strong>ternalization of the relationship with stable <strong>and</strong>structur<strong>in</strong>g parental figures depends on attachment<strong>and</strong>, therefore, on the subject’s capacities ofsymbolization such as employment, learn<strong>in</strong>g ofritual practices, <strong>and</strong> construction of social roles.8. RELIGIOUS FIGURES ANDATTACHMENTMary A<strong>in</strong>sworth has shown how, on the pathto adulthood, the first attachment figures arereplaced by sexual partners, family members(gr<strong>and</strong>parents, brothers, sisters, or other k<strong>in</strong>),<strong>and</strong> members of peer groups.(13) Therapists alsoare assigned the role of an attachment figure. Tofully benefit from psychotherapy, it is imperativethat the patient lean on a secure base.(9) Froma developmental po<strong>in</strong>t of view, religious figuresplay the role of attachment figures, because theyoffer a secure relational frame. A<strong>in</strong>sworth notesthat priests or pastors are also potential attachmentfigures. In the religious field, div<strong>in</strong>itiesor sa<strong>in</strong>ts can be used as reassur<strong>in</strong>g figures. It isworth consider<strong>in</strong>g up to what po<strong>in</strong>t we can speakof attachment figures when perceptible contact isnot possible.In the psychology of religion, Granqvist <strong>and</strong>Kirkpatrick have developed the idea that religiousfigures would fill a lack of attachment bonds <strong>and</strong>play the role of “resilience tutors” by <strong>in</strong>carnat<strong>in</strong>gthe parental function. In most Western religioustraditions <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> attachment research, the religious<strong>in</strong>dividual’s close relationship with a personalGod is central.(14) In Bowlby’s normativeattachment conceptualization, the term attachmentrelationship does not refer to any type ofclose relationship but exclusively to those thatmeet four criteria: proximity ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, safehaven, secure base, <strong>and</strong> separation distress.(15)Granqvist’s <strong>and</strong> Kirkpatrick’s studies are based onthe assumption that these four criteria are reasonablymet as concerns the relationship of thebeliever with a spiritual object/figure. Hence, itis suggested that some aspects of attachment aresimilar for the believer <strong>in</strong> relation to his or herspiritual object/figure <strong>and</strong> for the child <strong>in</strong> relationto her parents, that is, they serve the function ofobta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g/ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a sense of perceived securitywhen <strong>in</strong> distress.(16) There are several meansavailable for the religious <strong>in</strong>dividual to establisha sense of proximity or closeness to a spiritualfigure/object, such as us<strong>in</strong>g symbols, engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>rituals, <strong>and</strong> prayer.(14) Regard<strong>in</strong>g the safe havenaspect of attachment, one of the best documentedf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> psychology of religion is that believersturn to God <strong>in</strong> situations of distress. Such situationsare diverse <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude loss through death<strong>and</strong> divorce, (17) emotional crises, (18, 19) <strong>and</strong>relationship problems, (20) all of which are likelyto activate the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s attachment system.Two different modes of psychological coherencerelated to spiritual/religious cop<strong>in</strong>g havebeen described. The correspondence hypothesissuggests that there is a correspondence betweenearly child-parent <strong>in</strong>teractions on the one h<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> a person’s ability to cope <strong>in</strong> relation to a spiritualobject/figure on the other. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to thishypothesis, a secure attachment history wouldenable a person to use a spiritual/religious object/figure as an attachment figure, which proximitywould help regulate affects. The compensationhypothesis suggests that an <strong>in</strong>secure attachmenthistory would lead to a strong religiousness/spiritualityas a compensation of the lack of perceivedsecurity.(21)9. RELIGIOUS FIGURES PLAYING THEROLES OF PARENTAL FIGURESReferential religious figures can bridge the gapsbetween identification figures. In certa<strong>in</strong> religioustraditions, people practic<strong>in</strong>g a religious functionare called father or mother . These same denom<strong>in</strong>ationscan be applied to sa<strong>in</strong>ts or to div<strong>in</strong>e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!