12.07.2015 Views

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 Pierre-Yves Br<strong>and</strong>t, Claude-Alex<strong>and</strong>re Fournier, <strong>and</strong> Sylvia Mohr<strong>in</strong>dividuals th<strong>in</strong>k of themselves <strong>in</strong> the longterm. This representation is <strong>in</strong>evitably culturallydependent: it conta<strong>in</strong>s a certa<strong>in</strong>concept of self-identity that can vary <strong>in</strong>function of age, sex, <strong>and</strong> social position. Itis “how the subject is advised to th<strong>in</strong>k ofhimself or herself.”So that this self does not rema<strong>in</strong> an auxiliary,peripheral be<strong>in</strong>g (a false self?), it hasto be taken charge of by the ego (accord<strong>in</strong>gto Freudian term<strong>in</strong>ology here), whichadjusts the degree of centrality it grantsto the identifications offered by the (representationof the) self conveyed by culture.Furthermore, preferences <strong>in</strong> this fieldare more or less <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the familyenvironment.At each stage of their existence, <strong>in</strong>dividualsconstruct the self their ego is able to undertake,by means of identity representationsprovided by their environment. A transformationof the self can result from reorganizationcaused by endogenous factors (newcognitive abilities, new impulsive expressions),or by exogenous factors (access toa new social position, confront<strong>in</strong>g situationsthat are not easily assimilated by thealready constructed self). Transformationof the self means: access to a new identity(pp. 56–57).(2)This def<strong>in</strong>ition of the self should not be mistakenwith the Self def<strong>in</strong>ed by Carl Gustav Jungas an archetype whose function is the union ofopposites <strong>and</strong> that is perceived by the ego astranscendent as it is able to <strong>in</strong>tegrate the ego <strong>and</strong>what the ego is not able to <strong>in</strong>tegrate, or shadow.For Jung, the relationship between the Self <strong>and</strong>the ego is situated at the level of the <strong>in</strong>trapsychic.What we mean here by self is, on the contrary,located where the ego meets with its environment.It is an effect of symbolism that languageconstruction <strong>and</strong> self-representation are necessary<strong>in</strong> communicational exchange.5. DEVELOPMENTAL ASPECTS OFIDENTITY CONSTRUCTIONIn his works on the <strong>in</strong>terpersonal world of the<strong>in</strong>fant, (3) Daniel Stern p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>ts the emergenceof a sense of self to a very young age. Already attwo to six months, an <strong>in</strong>fant beg<strong>in</strong>s to have thesense of a core self. The permanence of the contactwith his own body allows him to recognize himselfas a physical entity with its own cohesion <strong>and</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>uity. He experiences the permanent availabilityof the sensory <strong>and</strong> proprioceptive feedbackcom<strong>in</strong>g from his own body, as opposed tothe exterior signals com<strong>in</strong>g from outside his self.This description connects what Didier Anzieucalled the “Moi-peau,” (4) or “sk<strong>in</strong>-ego”. The feel<strong>in</strong>gsof identity <strong>and</strong> self-representation are basedon the construction of a psychic envelope, whichdevelops us<strong>in</strong>g the bodily envelope for support.The bodily envelope is a border between the body<strong>and</strong> the outside world <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ternalization ofthis first experience of creat<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ner vesselwith<strong>in</strong> oneself. This sense of a “core self as a separate,cohesive, delimited physical entity with itsown awareness of activity, affection, <strong>and</strong> temporalcont<strong>in</strong>uity” (p. 21), (5) will deepen at the ageof seven months with the sense of a subjective self ,when the baby is able to attribute to others thecapability of hav<strong>in</strong>g a mental state similar to itsown. Then, dur<strong>in</strong>g the second year of life, thissense is further enriched by the sense of a verbalself , which forms with the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of verballanguage.The emergence of these different def<strong>in</strong>itionsof the self is achieved <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> by <strong>in</strong>terpersonalrelationships, particularly with the mother (orwith any other person <strong>in</strong> charge of mother<strong>in</strong>g).This relationship, <strong>in</strong>tegral to identity, is first ofall an affective one. Daniel Stern referred to itas “affective attunement.” The attunement canbe seen as the mother’s response to the child’sspontaneous activity <strong>and</strong> particularities. Thisresponse is both a validation of <strong>and</strong> a support totheir activity. There are of course different levelsof attunement, rang<strong>in</strong>g from a pure <strong>and</strong> simplerebuff to model<strong>in</strong>g appropriate behavior ( thegood-enough mother , accord<strong>in</strong>g to W<strong>in</strong>nicott).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!