Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

More documents

Recommendations

Info

StepNo.10.ProcessPut up scale statements on “FINANCING STRATEGY FORTHE POOR”Ask“Which is the statement you most agree with?”“Which statement best describes the policy in place atthe time of creating WSS services under projects?”Explanatory NotesArrange at random,NOT as a scale.Ask about what happened as a result, in each project.Facilitate discussions on what implications can be drawnabout how to improve access of the poor to sustainedservices.Record conclusions.Individuals to vote using BLUE/PINK tokens forspecific projects. Scores are then added to show thegradation.11.Put up 5 statements from the scale on PRESENCEAND DEFINITION OF GENDER in the project, on 5cards as shown on the left. Ask :“Which statement best describes the policy in place atthe time of establishing WSS services in projects?”●●Groups discuss and each group puts 1 vote on the wall,using BLUE/PINK circles, next to the statement that bestfits the answer.Scores for statements are then placed on the cards.Discussion is facilitated on selected statements, theirscores and rationale for the selection.12.Present all final scores to plenary on chart (which wasgradually built up during the workshop). Ask whichareas are most in need of sector policy reform. (Getthem to discuss in 4 small groups of mixed project /non-project. Groups give their ranking to plenary, withrationale). Each group reports on flipchart with thefollowing format :Ranks Policy Area RationaleEnsure clarifications of why they say so.1234567If there is consensus about areas with the lowestscores, facilitate discussion about obstacles topolicy changes therein, and what can be done atpolicy-makers’ level to improve the situation.For areas which look like strengths, discuss howthey could be utilized to improve the weak areas.Record and distribute final conclusions along withfinal consolidated scores.154 Appendix B
ReferencesBernard, Russel H. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology, Walnut Creek, London, New Delhi,Altamira Press.Collinson, Michael. (1981). A low-cost approach to understanding small farmers. AgriculturalAdministration, 8, 433-450.Esrey, Steven A. (1994). Complementary strategies for decreasing diarrhea morbidity and mortality:water and sanitation. Paper presented at the Pan American Health Organization, March 2-3.Fong, Monica S., Wakeman, Wendy and Bhushan, Anjana. (1996). Toolkit on gender in water andsanitation. (Worldbank gender toolkit No. 2). Washington D.C. The World Bank. Also available:http://www.worldbank.org/gender/know/agtlkit.pdf. (April 25, 2001).Gross, Bruce. Wijk, Christine van and Mukherjee, Nilanjana. (2001). Linking Sustainability withDemand, Gender and Poverty: A Study in community-managed water supply projects in 15 countries.Water and Sanitation Program and IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre.James, A.J. (2000). ‘An Improved methodology for participatory assessments’, Paper presented atworkshop on Participatory Approaches to Project Design, Implementation and Evaluation. IIRR Philippinesand MYRADA, Bangalore.Katz, Travis and Sara, Jennifer. (1997). Making Rural Water Supply Sustainable: Recommendationsfrom a global study. UNDP/World Bank Water and Sanitation Program.Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Moser, Caroline O.N. (1993). Gender Planning and Development : Theory, Practice and Training.London and New York: Routledge.Mukherjee, Nilanjana and Josodipoero, Ratna I. (2000). Is it Selling Toilets? No, A Lifestyle. Waterand Sanitation Program – East Asia and the Pacific.Mukherjee, Nilanjana. (2001). Achieving Sustained Sanitation for the Poor: Policy and strategy lessonsfrom participatory assessments in Cambodia, Indonesia and Vietnam. Water and Sanitation Program –East Asia and the Pacific.References 155
Page 1 and 2:
SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 3:
SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 6 and 7:
PrefaceThe mission of the Water and
Page 8 and 9:
AcknowledgementsThe Participatory L
Page 10 and 11:
viii
Page 12 and 13:
4.9 Visualization and self-scoring
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 18 KDP 2 activity cycle with
Page 17 and 18:
THE CHALLENGE OF SUSTAINED WATER SU
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGER
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSkey va
Page 37 and 38:
THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsevera
Page 39 and 40:
THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESS●●
Page 41 and 42:
THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSThe MP
Page 43 and 44:
THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsegreg
Page 45 and 46:
THE MPA IN ACTIONaction points in i
Page 47 and 48:
THE MPA IN ACTION●●●●●●
Page 49 and 50:
THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 15 Key element
Page 51 and 52:
THE MPA IN ACTIONsuccessful or unsu
Page 53 and 54:
THE MPA IN ACTIONexternal facilitat
Page 55 and 56:
THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 17 Indicative
Page 57 and 58:
THE MPA IN ACTIONvisits and conduct
Page 59 and 60:
THE MPA IN ACTIONScoring principles
Page 61 and 62:
THE MPA IN ACTION4.10 Quality contr
Page 63 and 64:
THE MPA IN ACTIONExperiences with t
Page 65 and 66:
THE MPA IN ACTION5Organizing and In
Page 67 and 68:
Box 22 Gender and poverty analysis
Page 69 and 70:
ORGANIZING AND INTERPRETING THE DAT
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
PARTICIPATORY TOOLS USED IN THE MPA
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Section 2MPAApplication Case Studie
Page 111 and 112:
DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120: DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 121 and 122: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEDANIDA began
Page 123 and 124: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE2. Key findi
Page 125 and 126: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEReality of e
Page 127 and 128: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEAdding Accou
Page 129 and 130: ADDING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR GENDER EQ
Page 137 and 138: Table 2WSLIC 2: ADDING POVERTY ACCO
Page 141 and 142: Table 3 (continued) ADDING PERFORMA
Page 145 and 146: LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMembers
Page 147 and 148: LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 149 and 150: LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 151 and 152: LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARD●●
Page 153 and 154: LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMPA core
Page 155 and 156: EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 157 and 158: EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 159 and 160: ACHIEVING SUSTAINED SANITATION FOR
Page 161 and 162: HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 163 and 164: HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 165 and 166: Appendix AInstitutions that current
Page 167 and 168: Appendix BProcess designed forPLA P
Page 169: StepNo.7.ProcessAsk “Were users e
Page 173: Wijk, Christine van. (1998). ‘Gen
Page 176: Water and Sanitation ProgramWater S
show all

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?