Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGERS OF LARGE CDD PROGRAMSFigure 2 The process of an increasingly specific focusIn an openmeeting, womenand men identify,with the help ofdrawings of poorand wealthierhouseholds, thecharacteristics oflow, medium andupper classhouseholds in theircommunity.In an openThe facilitators usemeeting, thethe map to plan agroup draws atransect walk to asocial map of thesample of watercommunity. Theyuse their readingsof the three classespoints and meet> > >with groups ofwomen and mento mark the socioeconomiclevel ofthe system toat various points inthe households. In assess the qualitythe map, theyof the service.delineate theThey also meethouseholds withwith women andand withoutmen in theaccess, or withunserved area.poor access to theservice.The facilitators usethe map toorganize separatemeetings withwomen and menfrom poor andwealthier/middleclass households.In these meetings,the groups assesstheir participation,sharing of benefitsand contributions,use of services,and impacts ontheir lives.Practicing gender and poverty sensitiveness is part of training and field procedures.●●●to what extent the demands of each groupare met;how access to water and the benefits andburdens from, and control over, localparticipation and management are dividedbetween the socio-economic groups andbetween women and men;the relationship of these divisions with thesustainability and use of the water supply andimproved sanitation.Other differences on which hierarchies anddiscrimination are based, such as caste, ethnicity,religion, and nationality, may be taken intoaccount locally. Being situation-specific, they havenot been highlighted here.2.3.4 Empowerment through selfassessmentand actionThe MPA differs from many other gender andsocial analysis frameworks in that local womenand men participate in the analysis of equityand sustainability in a gender- and povertysensitive,empowering mode. A systematicprocedure enhances the participation of allstakeholder groups in the process, as illustratedin Figure 2.All of these potential benefits can be realized only if the MPA application is tailored to the projectand the purpose for which it is used, with attention and resources being devoted to qualityassurance mechanisms, as explained in Chapter 4.16
A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGERS OF LARGE CDD PROGRAMS2.4 What do MPAassessments cost?Typically, using the MPA for sustainabilityassessment requires two facilitators that spend aminimum of four to five days in a village, and atleast one day in a stakeholder meeting at districtor province level. This does not include time forplanning, data analysis, and reporting, whichwould vary with the size of the project, objectivesof assessment and therefore, the required sample.Generally, MPA assessments for project design mayrequire a sample of only a few communities whichtogether represent the major design-influencingvariables for a new project, e.g., geo-hydrologicalconditions or relative poverty and diarrhealmorbility rates. Using the MPA for micro-planningcommunity interventions implies assessments inevery project community, and their costs shouldbe built into routine project implementationprocedures. Monitoring and evaluationapplications are likely to use stratified or purposivesampling of 5-10 percent of all projectcommunities at similar points in the project cycle.Following the global assessments, the MPA is nowbeing applied on a larger scale. Budgets preparedfor its application for planning and monitoring ina large scale project in Indonesia suggest thatcosts of the MPA can be comparable to those ofother community-based approaches, when theMPA is integrated in project implementation. TheMPA seems to best fit projects aiming atcommunity-driven development, which typicallyallocate 20-30 percent of total project costs tosoftware investments.More cost-related information can be found inSection 2, in the case studies from Lao PDR andIndonesia - the Flores project evaluation.17
Page 1 and 2: SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 3: SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 6 and 7: PrefaceThe mission of the Water and
Page 8 and 9: AcknowledgementsThe Participatory L
Page 10 and 11: viii
Page 12 and 13: 4.9 Visualization and self-scoring
Page 14 and 15: Figure 18 KDP 2 activity cycle with
Page 17 and 18: THE CHALLENGE OF SUSTAINED WATER SU
Page 27 and 28: A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGER
Page 29 and 30: A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGER
Page 31: A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGER
Page 35 and 36: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSkey va
Page 37 and 38: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsevera
Page 39 and 40: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESS●●
Page 41 and 42: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSThe MP
Page 43 and 44: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsegreg
Page 45 and 46: THE MPA IN ACTIONaction points in i
Page 47 and 48: THE MPA IN ACTION●●●●●●
Page 49 and 50: THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 15 Key element
Page 51 and 52: THE MPA IN ACTIONsuccessful or unsu
Page 53 and 54: THE MPA IN ACTIONexternal facilitat
Page 55 and 56: THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 17 Indicative
Page 57 and 58: THE MPA IN ACTIONvisits and conduct
Page 59 and 60: THE MPA IN ACTIONScoring principles
Page 61 and 62: THE MPA IN ACTION4.10 Quality contr
Page 63 and 64: THE MPA IN ACTIONExperiences with t
Page 65 and 66: THE MPA IN ACTION5Organizing and In
Page 67 and 68: Box 22 Gender and poverty analysis
Page 69 and 70: ORGANIZING AND INTERPRETING THE DAT
Page 79 and 80: PARTICIPATORY TOOLS USED IN THE MPA
Page 81 and 82: PARTICIPATORY TOOLS USED IN THE MPA
Page 83 and 84:
PARTICIPATORY TOOLS USED IN THE MPA
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Section 2MPAApplication Case Studie
Page 111 and 112:
DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEDANIDA began
Page 123 and 124:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE2. Key findi
Page 125 and 126:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEReality of e
Page 127 and 128:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEAdding Accou
Page 129 and 130:
ADDING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR GENDER EQ
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Table 2WSLIC 2: ADDING POVERTY ACCO
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Table 3 (continued) ADDING PERFORMA
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMembers
Page 147 and 148:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 149 and 150:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 151 and 152:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARD●●
Page 153 and 154:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMPA core
Page 155 and 156:
EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 157 and 158:
EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 159 and 160:
ACHIEVING SUSTAINED SANITATION FOR
Page 161 and 162:
HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 163 and 164:
HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix AInstitutions that current
Page 167 and 168:
Appendix BProcess designed forPLA P
Page 169 and 170:
StepNo.7.ProcessAsk “Were users e
Page 171 and 172:
ReferencesBernard, Russel H. (1995)
Page 173:
Wijk, Christine van. (1998). ‘Gen
Page 176:
Water and Sanitation ProgramWater S
show all

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?