12.07.2015 Views

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGERS OF LARGE CDD PROGRAMSdevolution of central government authority, to thereduction of gender <strong>and</strong> poverty inequalities, theprotection of the environment, <strong>and</strong> the integratedmanagement of water used for different <strong>and</strong> oftencompeting purposes. In consequence, separategender <strong>and</strong> social equity investigations are rarelycarried out.The two previous methodologies for analyzing <strong>and</strong>improving community water supplies <strong>and</strong>sanitation (the Minimum Evaluation Procedures<strong>and</strong> the Participatory Evaluation Tools) did notsystematically include the analysis of gender <strong>and</strong>social equity aspects. Projects that wished toanalyze such aspects had to therefore use aseparate study by a social researcher withspecialization in gender studies. In practice, thiscame to mean that equity assessments often didnot happen.Equity assessment is more likely to happen whenit can be investigated along with other issues ofmajor interest to the program. Having a combinedset of tools to analyze sustainability <strong>and</strong> gender<strong>and</strong> social equity aspects makes it easier forcommunity women <strong>and</strong> men, project staff <strong>and</strong>managers to analyze <strong>and</strong> improve these aspectsconcurrently.2.3.3 Addressinggender <strong>and</strong>social equityin a sectorspecificwayThe gender analysis in the MPA builds uponframeworks that were developed by Overholt <strong>and</strong>others in 1984 <strong>and</strong> Moser in 1993. Theseframeworks were a breakthrough in the analysisof gender in development, but they also havesome limitations:● They are not sector specific;● Analysis is usually through case studies byexternal specialists; <strong>and</strong>● The focus is on gender inequalities withoutaddressing social equity issues.The gender <strong>and</strong> social analysis frameworksincluded in the MPA are specific for the drinkingwater <strong>and</strong> sanitation sector, as shown in Boxes 7<strong>and</strong> 8. They use participatory methods <strong>and</strong>address differences in gender <strong>and</strong> social welfaredivisions <strong>and</strong> benefits.The main equity issues that community groups<strong>and</strong> program staff <strong>and</strong> managers may jointlydiscover <strong>and</strong> use to act upon relate to:MPA training sessions on gender <strong>and</strong> social equity(see Chapter 4) help future facilitators to identify<strong>and</strong> practice measures that make implementationmore equitable for women <strong>and</strong> the poor. Bringingout gender <strong>and</strong> poverty aspects in contents <strong>and</strong>analysis <strong>and</strong> bringing together negatively affectedgroups, are first steps in a process of change.Assessing these aspects further serves as a baselinefor action planning <strong>and</strong> monitoring <strong>and</strong> providesbenchmarks for measuring progress in programs,as illustrated in the case studies in the secondsection of this book.●whether women <strong>and</strong> poor people have thesame access to water <strong>and</strong> participation as men<strong>and</strong> the wealthier households;15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!