Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

More documents

Recommendations

Info

THE MPA IN ACTIONSince misconceptions or incomplete understandingof participatory methods are often at the root ofbad practice, managers can be encouraged tobetter understand the strengths and limitations ofthe use of participatory tools and techniques. Theycan further enhance the quality of applications bychecking whether:●●●●●●field teams have spent the full time period withthe sampled communities;there is evidence, such as copies orphotographs of the outputs from tools, thatthe scores are based on participatoryassessments;poor women and men, and groups normallyexcluded for other reasons, have taken partin the activities;the full range of data has been recorded;qualitative information has been recorded andanalyzed;facilitators have assisted community groups to●analyze the outcomes and identify actions; andfacilitators have developed variations inexisting tools and processes and developednew tools in response to field conditionsand as a sign of ongoing creativity andcommitment.At a more general level, WSP and IRC seek toprotect the quality of the work in several ways:●●●by working with a known group ofexperienced organizations that trainsfacilitators in the use of the MPA. The groupis large enough to meet requirements andavoid monopolies;by seeking the introduction of internal andexternal peer review for quality preservationand further development; andby organizing periodic experience audits withMPA practitioners from different parts of theworld.48
THE MPA IN ACTION5Organizing and Interpretingthe DataThe informationthat emergesfrom MPAassessments can beanalyzed at several levels.Different types of analysisare possible, qualitativeas well as quantitative.This chapter provides abrief overview of how toprocess the data andpresent the findings tothose who need to knowthem in order to makedecisions and takerequired action.Data summarization and presentation at community level by a villagerin Java, Indonesia5.1 Analysis of outcomes pertoolvoting cards of women and men, etc. – aredisplayed often on the ground, or on walls, sothat all can see them.The first outcomes of a sequence of participatoryactivities are the pictures, diagrams or maps thatthe participants produce. They present visuallyvarious aspects of the local water or sanitationsituation for all participants to discuss, analyze,draw conclusions, and plan actions.The most basic analysis is at the level of everytool. The outcomes – a social map, a series ofsmiling faces, a drawing, a diagram, pictures withTo help the group draw conclusions, thefacilitators may ask probing questions such as:●●●●●What does the picture say?Does it reflect the real situation?Are aspects or situations missing from thepicture?What can we learn from it?Does it say something about differencesbetween women and men, or between thosewho are well-off and poor?49
Page 1 and 2:
SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 3:
SustainabilityPlanning andMonitorin
Page 6 and 7:
PrefaceThe mission of the Water and
Page 8 and 9:
AcknowledgementsThe Participatory L
Page 10 and 11:
viii
Page 12 and 13:
4.9 Visualization and self-scoring
Page 14 and 15: Figure 18 KDP 2 activity cycle with
Page 17 and 18: THE CHALLENGE OF SUSTAINED WATER SU
Page 27 and 28: A NEW TOOL FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGER
Page 35 and 36: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSkey va
Page 37 and 38: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsevera
Page 39 and 40: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESS●●
Page 41 and 42: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSThe MP
Page 43 and 44: THE MPA FRAMEWORK AND PROCESSsegreg
Page 45 and 46: THE MPA IN ACTIONaction points in i
Page 47 and 48: THE MPA IN ACTION●●●●●●
Page 49 and 50: THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 15 Key element
Page 51 and 52: THE MPA IN ACTIONsuccessful or unsu
Page 53 and 54: THE MPA IN ACTIONexternal facilitat
Page 55 and 56: THE MPA IN ACTIONBox 17 Indicative
Page 57 and 58: THE MPA IN ACTIONvisits and conduct
Page 59 and 60: THE MPA IN ACTIONScoring principles
Page 61 and 62: THE MPA IN ACTION4.10 Quality contr
Page 63: THE MPA IN ACTIONExperiences with t
Page 67 and 68: Box 22 Gender and poverty analysis
Page 69 and 70: ORGANIZING AND INTERPRETING THE DAT
Page 79 and 80: PARTICIPATORY TOOLS USED IN THE MPA
Page 109 and 110: Section 2MPAApplication Case Studie
Page 111 and 112: DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 113 and 114: DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 115 and 116:
DO PROJECT RULES PROMOTE SUSTAINABI
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEDANIDA began
Page 123 and 124:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE2. Key findi
Page 125 and 126:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEReality of e
Page 127 and 128:
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICEAdding Accou
Page 129 and 130:
ADDING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR GENDER EQ
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Table 2WSLIC 2: ADDING POVERTY ACCO
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Table 3 (continued) ADDING PERFORMA
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMembers
Page 147 and 148:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 149 and 150:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDFigure 2
Page 151 and 152:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARD●●
Page 153 and 154:
LOOKING BACK TO SEE FORWARDMPA core
Page 155 and 156:
EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 157 and 158:
EFFECT OF THE MPA ON GENDER RELATIO
Page 159 and 160:
ACHIEVING SUSTAINED SANITATION FOR
Page 161 and 162:
HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 163 and 164:
HOW WELL DID THOSE DEVELOPMENT PROJ
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix AInstitutions that current
Page 167 and 168:
Appendix BProcess designed forPLA P
Page 169 and 170:
StepNo.7.ProcessAsk “Were users e
Page 171 and 172:
ReferencesBernard, Russel H. (1995)
Page 173:
Wijk, Christine van. (1998). ‘Gen
Page 176:
Water and Sanitation ProgramWater S
show all

Sustainability Planning and Monitoring

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?