13.07.2015 Views

SCT Banner Human Resources / Release Guide / 7.0

SCT Banner Human Resources / Release Guide / 7.0

SCT Banner Human Resources / Release Guide / 7.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 23 Problem ResolutionsReports and ProcessesNBPMASSThe following defects have been resolved in the Mass Salary Table Update Process(NBPMASS):• (#88679)The parameter description field on the Parameter Value Validation Form(GJAPVAL) for parameter 01 of the Mass Salary Table Update Process(NBPMASS) does not provide an adequate description of the variousparameter values that are valid. The descriptions have been updated to beconsistent with other processes with this same parameter: Process Mode andReport Mode descriptions are used for the parameter 01. Resolved in <strong>Human</strong><strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Release</strong> 6.1.• (#94777)The following error message was encountered when running the Mass SalaryBatch Update Process (NBPMASS) when the MM/DD fields were null on theEmployee Jobs Form (NBAJOBS): ORA-01840: input value not long enough fordate format. This has been corrected by modifying the sel_mm_dd_step_incrroutine to add NVL to all occurrences of nbrbjob_step_incr_mon andnbrbjob_step_inc_day. Resolved in <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Release</strong> 6.1.0.1.NBPBROLThe following defects have been resolved in the Budget Roll Process (NBPBROL):• (#87664)Previously, the Budget Roll Process (NBPBROL) was allowing the approval ofthe new fiscal year when there were no existing working budgets in the newfiscal year. The old fiscal year was inactivated on the Fiscal Year Form(NBAFISC), and the HR/Finance Set Up Rules Form (NTRFINI) was set to thenew year, and old position budget records were being set to Closed. This leftthe positions without approved budgets in the new year and caused problemswhen viewing job records for these positions. It was determined that theprocess would not produce the correct error condition when there were noworking budgets for at least one qualified position in the new fiscal year.This problem has been corrected so that the approval process will be executedwhen all qualified positions have the correct Working budget record. Anyposition that is qualified to roll into the new fiscal year, that does not have thetarget 'Working' budget record, will cause the Fiscal Year Approval process toerror out. All on-going positions must have the appropriate working budgetrecord for the new fiscal year to be approved. Resolved in Position Control<strong>Release</strong> 6.0.0.1.<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>/Position Control <strong>Release</strong> <strong>7.0</strong> January 2005316 <strong>Release</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> Confidential

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!