30.07.2015 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 E. A. SYDENHAM.it appears practically certain that no brass or coppercoins were struck at ei<strong>the</strong>r Borne or Lugdunum. Tothis period, however, belongs a fairly extensive issue<strong>of</strong> dated aurei <strong>and</strong> denarii with <strong>the</strong> reverse type <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>civic crown <strong>and</strong> legend PONTIF MAX TR P (TR P-VII-COS-IIII PP), continued between A.D. 60 <strong>and</strong> 63by <strong>the</strong> Ceres, Mars, <strong>and</strong> Roma types. Both mints seemto have been employed in <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>secoins, <strong>and</strong> as <strong>the</strong>y show two different renderings <strong>of</strong>Nero's portrait, we are probably right in assigningthose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cruder style [PL VI. 30] to Lugdunum,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> more artistic to Rome [PI. VI. 29].During <strong>the</strong> last eight years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reign (A.D. 60-8)<strong>the</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lugdunum mint increased enormously,particularly with regard to <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> brass<strong>and</strong> copper. Fortunately in <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> attributionwe have one or two fairly defined l<strong>and</strong>marks toguide us.At <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perioda group <strong>of</strong> copper asses with stylisticto those noticed in <strong>the</strong> Lugdunum(A.D. 60-3) we findfeatures similarcoins <strong>of</strong> Tiberius<strong>and</strong> Claudius [PI. VI. 3l].That is to say, <strong>the</strong> formation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> letters is irregular, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> portrait has aflat appearance, although <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile is less harsh thanon <strong>the</strong> coins <strong>of</strong> Claudius. <strong>The</strong> somewhat untidyarrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hair is characteristic, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re isa tendency to make <strong>the</strong> head ra<strong>the</strong>r large <strong>and</strong> outspread,in marked contrast to <strong>the</strong> more compactRoman style.Thus <strong>the</strong>re seems good reason for believing that <strong>the</strong>ybelong to Lugdunum <strong>and</strong> form a continuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>senatorial copperseries <strong>of</strong> Claudius. At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> reign we find <strong>the</strong> following denarius :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!