The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

'318 MISCELLANEA.belong to the cast series of the now well-known Hengistburytype. 1It will be observed that Dr. Smith's analysis agrees fairlywell with that of two (a and d) of the similar coinsanalysed by Prof. Gowland, whose table of four analysesI reproduce from p. 75 of the Hengistbury Report.a b c d'.Copper. , . 73.06 71-66 85-00 76-0Tin . . . . 11-02 17.41 2-26 11-7Lead .... 7-78 0-37 9-6Silver 1-31100.00 100-00 100-00 100-00Prof. Gowland remarks that " the coins, with the exceptionof a and d, are extremely variable in the proportions ofcopper, tin, and lead they contain. A coin of Augustus andAgrippa . . . has the following composition :Copper .... 78-45Tin 12-96Lead .... 8-62It hence resembles a and d, but I do not think theyhave been obtained by melting these Eoman coins." Buthe does not give his reason for doubting this otherwise veryprobable view of their origin.The coins described by Dr. Smith under C belonged toa class usually regarded as struck coins, of the usual Southwesterntype. It will be observed that the specimenanalysed contained no lead. It would be interesting toknow whether analyses of other specimens confirm this ;naturally one would expect the earlier coins to be purerthan the later. A reference to J. Hammer's tables 2 seemsto show that some of the Koman struck coins containtin in large proportions, although it was usually helped outby a slight admixture of lead. In the present condition ofthe coins from Hengistbury,it is impossible to say that someof them may not have been made by casting, although theoriginal British coins of the type were always struck.G. F. H.1Society of Antiquaries of London, Reports of the ResearchCommittee, No. Ill, pp. 64 ff.