30.07.2015 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHRONOLOGY OF THE COINS OF CHIOS. 24:7diobols <strong>of</strong> type No. 77 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir corresponding drachms.This would mean, supposing that my attribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>group in question is correct, that <strong>the</strong>se agonistic coinswere struck some time between 50 <strong>and</strong> 30 B. c.<strong>The</strong>yare <strong>the</strong> forerunners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> well-known Imperial issues<strong>of</strong> Chios with a figure <strong>of</strong> Homer on <strong>the</strong> reverse.<strong>The</strong> thyrsus adorned with fillets, which here forms<strong>the</strong> reversetype, may be compared with <strong>the</strong> symbolon <strong>the</strong> drachms <strong>of</strong> type No. 69 with AZ(()AAHZ <strong>and</strong>AEHNIAHX, <strong>and</strong> on a small bronze coin describedbelow (type No. 93). <strong>The</strong> reverse <strong>of</strong> type No. 94 isalso very similar to this one.Nos. 80-2.We now come to <strong>the</strong> drachms that mayfairly be considered to belong to <strong>the</strong> years borderingupon <strong>the</strong> accession <strong>of</strong> Augustus, which event I amsupposing to have been commemorated by <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong>type No. 82 [PI. IX. .11] No. 80 falls into this categorybecause <strong>of</strong> its style, lettering, <strong>and</strong> weight, whichso closely resemble those <strong>of</strong> No. 82, <strong>and</strong> No. 81 [PI. IX.10] because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magistrates' names that it bears.<strong>The</strong> style <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se coins has been referred to above.It seems reasonable to suppose that some effort shouldhave been made to produce <strong>the</strong> best possible workunder <strong>the</strong> circumstances, <strong>and</strong>, although <strong>the</strong> results arenot remarkable, <strong>the</strong> obverse designs <strong>of</strong> types Nos. 80<strong>and</strong> 82, at least, are an improvement over those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>types just described. <strong>The</strong>se two issues may be said toresemble <strong>the</strong> best specimens <strong>of</strong> No. 69 more than any<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intervening coins described here. <strong>The</strong> concavefield<strong>of</strong> No. 80 suggests that some even earlier issuehad been taken as a model, for this feature has notbeen noticeable since type No. 63 /3, although <strong>the</strong>rewere traces <strong>of</strong> it in Nos. 69 <strong>and</strong> 73.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!