Juliano et al. - 1993 - Grain Quality Evaluation of World Rices

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CEA CENTA CH CICA CINIA CN CNA CP CR CR D DA DB DJ E EAL ECIA EEA EMPASC EPEAL FARO FAROX FB FMC - Centro Nacional de Tecnificacion Agricola Chira Centro Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario - - - Cuba Los Palacios Central rice Costa Rica Dacca Dhaka, Bangladesh - - - Estacion Central Investigaciones del Arroz Estacao Experimental do Arroz - - Federal Agricultural Research Oryzae Federal Agricultural Research Oryzae Cross - - Paraguay El Salvador India Cali, Colombia ex International Center for Tropical Agriculture Chile Vietnam Philippines Rice Res. Stn., Los Palacios, Perai del Rio, Cuba Central Rice Res. Inst., Cuttack, Orissa, India Costa Rica Myanmar Dacca Res. Stn., Dacca, Bangladesh Bangladesh Pakistan Nigeria Peru Havana, Cuba Cachoeira, Brazil Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA), Goiania, Goias, Brazil Brazil Nigeria Nigeria Philippines Peru G GC GEB GR Gz - - Hungary Sierra Leone Government Economic Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Botany - Giza cross Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Ghana Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt Acronyms 95
H H H HSC IAC ICA ICTA IET IGP INIAP IR IRAT IRGA ISA ITA Iz J JS K KAV KN KS KT Hybrid - - - Instituto Agronomico de Campinas Instituto Colombiano Agropecuaria Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology Initial Evaluation Trial - - IRRI rice Institut de Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales et des Cultures Vivrieres (France) Instituto Rio Grandense do Arroz - Institute of Tropical Agriculture Izmir Jeypore - Karjat Kuningan Kala Shah Kaku - Central Agric. Res. Inst., Batalagoda, Sri Lanka Estacion Experimental de Arroz, Univ. Nacional de la Plata, Argentina Japan Hungary Sao Paolo, Brazil Cali, Colombia Guatemala All-India Coordinated Rice Improvement Program, Hyderabad, India India Ecuador Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines Bouake, Ivory Coast Cachoeira, Brazil Dominican Republic/ Sierra Leone Int. Inst. of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria Izmir, Turkey Rice Res. Stn. (OUAY), Jeypore, Orissa, India All-India Coordinated Rice Improvement Program, Hyderabad, India Karjat, Maharashtra, India Nigeria Rice Res. Stn., Kuningan Branch, Cirebon, Indonesia Rice Res. Stn., Kala Shah Kaku, Lahore, Pakistan Nepal 96 Grain quality evaluation of world rices
Page 2 and 3:
Grain Quality Evaluation of World R
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Foreword vii Abstract viii
Page 6:
Russia 61 Spain 62 Summary 63 Afric
Page 9 and 10:
Abstract P hysicochemical data on p
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction D ata bases are availa
Page 15:
Table 2. Classification of properti
Page 18 and 19:
(100:2 w/w) using a Labconco or Kin
Page 20 and 21:
Gel consistency Rice flour prepared
Page 22 and 23:
excessive pressure on the load cell
Page 24 and 25:
Asia I n 1989, Asia produced 449.3
Page 27 and 28:
Most Bangladeshi rice varieties are
Page 29 and 30:
Cambodia A nnual rough rice product
Page 31 and 32:
Type III, high-AC rice, has low wat
Page 33 and 34:
Iran T he rough rice production in
Page 35 and 36:
The Korean varieties had low-interm
Page 37 and 38:
Serendah Kuning had high AC, with e
Page 39 and 40:
all had low AC (except for Khaupher
Page 41 and 42:
Philippines T he Philippines produc
Page 43 and 44:
elatively low AC (Y.C. Teng, Counci
Page 45 and 46:
other market samples had low AC, ex
Page 47 and 48:
Summary Medium grains predominate i
Page 49 and 50:
Grain length and width were negativ
Page 51:
Table 6. Protein content and classi
Page 54 and 55:
(Dalrymple 1986). A market sample o
Page 56 and 57:
ack ( r = 0.89*) and peak viscosity
Page 58 and 59:
IRRI analyses confirmed Webb's phys
Page 60 and 61:
BraziI A nnual rough rice productio
Page 62 and 63: long, slender grain and translucenc
Page 64 and 65: Rices from Paraguay had mostly high
Page 66 and 67: Venezuela R ough rice production in
Page 69 and 70: Europe E urope produced 2.2 million
Page 72 and 73: France F rance produced 96,000 t of
Page 74 and 75: no aroma. A market sample of short-
Page 76 and 77: low GT, and mainly soft GC (Table 7
Page 78: Summary The japonica type varieties
Page 81: Table 8. Protein content and classi
Page 84 and 85: setback ( r = 0.92**, n = 12) and c
Page 86 and 87: Suakoko 8, well-suited for cultivat
Page 88 and 89: unpubl. data). Protein content was
Page 90 and 91: Sierra Leone R ough rice production
Page 92 and 93: Summary High-AC rices predominate i
Page 94 and 95: Table 9. Classification of O. glabe
Page 96: Table 11. Summary of protein conten
Page 99 and 100: References cited Adewusi A O, Nyant
Page 101 and 102: Juliano B O (1985) Criteria and tes
Page 103 and 104: Acknowledgments The data on propert
Page 105 and 106: France — Laboratoire de Cereales,
Page 107 and 108: Sources of 1990 grain quality infor
Page 109 and 110: Cross reference index of variety na
Page 111: Acronyms of rice varieties/lines Co
Page 115 and 116: RP RPW RTN RU S SL SLU SML SPR SR T
Page 117: Appendix Quality characteristics of
Page 121: Date Amy- Alkali Gel Amylograph vis
Page 133: Date Crop analyzed year (mo) (yr) A
Page 165:
Date Amy- Alkali Gel Amylograph vis
Page 169:
Page 173:
Page 177:
Page 181:
Page 185:
Page 189:
Date Amy- Alkali Gel AMylograph vis
Page 193:
Page 197:
Page 201:
Page 205:
Page 209:
Page 213:
Date Crop analyzed year (mo) (yr) A
Page 217:
Page 221:
Page 225:
Page 229:
Page 233:
Page 237:
Crop year Date analyzed (mo) (yr) A
Page 241:
Page 245:
Page 249:
Page 253:
Page 257:
Page 261:
Page 265:
Page 269:
Page 273:
Page 277:
Page 281:
Page 285:
Page 289:
Page 293:
Page 297:
Page 301:
Page 305:
Page 309:
Page 313:
Page 317:
Page 321:
Page 325:
show all

Juliano et al. - 1993 - Grain Quality Evaluation of World Rices

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?