09.12.2012 Views

Abstracts Brochure - CERN

Abstracts Brochure - CERN

Abstracts Brochure - CERN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEPLS017<br />

WEPLS018<br />

WEPLS019<br />

28-Jun-06 16:00 - 18:00 WEPLS — Poster Session<br />

regions between the HCC segments may provide a cost effective solution to the high repetition rate needed for an<br />

intense neutrino factory or high average luminosity muon collider. In the gaseous hydrogen absorber case, the<br />

pressurized RF cavities can be operated at low temperature to improve their efficiency for higher repetition rates.<br />

Numerical simulations are used to optimize and compare the liquid and gaseous HCC techniques.<br />

International Scoping Study (ISS) of a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex<br />

The ISS, launched at NuFact05 to evaluate the<br />

M.S. Zisman (LBNL)<br />

physics case for a facility, along with options<br />

for the accelerator complex and detectors, is<br />

laying the foundations for a subsequent conceptual-design study. It is hosted by RAL and organized by the international<br />

community, with participants from Europe, Japan, and the U.S. Here we cover work of the Accelerator Group.<br />

For the 4 MW proton driver, we consider linacs, synchrotrons, and FFAG rings. For targets, issues of both liquidmetal<br />

and solid materials are examined. For beam conditioning (phase rotation, bunching, and ionization cooling),<br />

we evaluate schemes with and without cooling, the latter based on scaling FFAG rings. For acceleration, we examine<br />

scaling FFAGs and hybrid systems comprising linacs, dogbone RLAs, and non-scaling FFAGs. For the decay ring we<br />

consider racetrack and triangular shapes, the latter capable of simultaneously illuminating two different detectors at<br />

different baselines. Comparisons are made between various technical approaches to identify optimum design choices<br />

for the facility.<br />

Optics for Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling of Muon Beams<br />

The realization of a muon collider requires a<br />

R.P. Johnson (Muons, Inc) Y.S. Derbenev (Jefferson Lab)<br />

reduction of the 6D normalized emittance of<br />

an initially generated muon beam by a factor<br />

of more than 10 6 . Analytical and simulation studies of 6D muon beam ionization cooling in a helical channel filled<br />

with pressurized gas or liquid hydrogen absorber indicate that a factor of 10 6 is possible. Further reduction of<br />

the normalized 4D transverse emittance by an additional two orders of magnitude is envisioned using Parametricresonance<br />

Ionization Cooling (PIC). To realize the phase shrinkage effect in the parametric resonance method, one<br />

needs to design a focusing channel free of chromatic and spherical aberrations. We report results of our study of a<br />

concept of an aberration-free wiggler transport line with an alternating dispersion function. Resonant beam focusing<br />

at thin beryllium wedge absorber plates positioned near zero dispersion points then provides the predicted PIC effect.<br />

Optics and RF Parameters for Absorber-based Reverse Emittance Exchange of Muon<br />

Beams<br />

The normalized longitudinal emittance of a<br />

R.P. Johnson (Muons, Inc) Y.S. Derbenev (Jefferson Lab)<br />

muon beam after six-dimensional ionization<br />

cooling appears very small compared to the<br />

value that could be utilized or maintained after acceleration to muon collider energy. This circumstance offers the<br />

possibility for further reduction of the transverse emittance by introducing absorber-based reverse emittance exchange<br />

(REMEX) between longitudinal and transverse degrees of freedom before acceleration to high energy. REMEX follows<br />

Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling and is accomplished in two stages. In the first stage the beam is stretched<br />

to fill the RF bucket at the initial cooling energy. In the second stage the beam is accelerated to about 2.5 GeV, where<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!