POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION
individual_chapters_pollination_20170305
individual_chapters_pollination_20170305
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />
48<br />
2. DRIVERS OF CHANGE OF <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>,<br />
<strong>POLLINATION</strong> NETWORKS <strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />
survivorship (Boggs and Freeman, 2005), and pollinators<br />
will likely be forced to seek alternative habitat. Skórka et al.<br />
(2013) found that butterfly roadkill in Poland increased as<br />
mowing frequency increased; adult butterflies that dispersed<br />
to find new habitat after roadsides were mowed were more<br />
likely to collide with vehicles.<br />
The frequency and timing of mowing influence the<br />
composition of vegetation over time (Forrester et al., 2005),<br />
thus indirectly influencing pollinator diversity and abundance.<br />
Frequent mowing during a growing season reduces native<br />
plant growth and the ability of forbs to compete with<br />
grasses. Excessive roadside mowing may have led to a<br />
decrease in flowers and a subsequent decrease in bumble<br />
bees in Belgium (Rasmont et al., 2006). Intensively-mowed<br />
roadsides generally have the shortest vegetation and lowest<br />
amount of nectar, which together result in decreased<br />
butterfly abundance (Gerell 1997; Saarinen et al., 2005).<br />
However, carefully timed roadside mowing can have positive<br />
effects on plant diversity (Parr and Way, 1988) that in turn<br />
benefit pollinators (e.g., Noordijk et al., 2009).<br />
Mowing technique can have a great influence on the effects<br />
on pollinators. Frick and Flury (2001) estimated losses<br />
from rotary mowers as between 9,000 and 24,000 bees<br />
per hectare in flowering white clover fields and 90,000 per<br />
hectare in flowering Phacelia. Mowing without a conditioner,<br />
which processes hay so it dries more quickly, reduced the<br />
mortality by a factor of seven. In order to avoid significant<br />
bee losses, the researchers recommend refraining from<br />
mowing in periods of increased flight activity. Humbert et<br />
al. (2010) analysed the direct impact on invertebrates of<br />
different hay harvesting processes. The use of a conditioner<br />
reduced the survival rate of orthopterans from 32% to<br />
18%. Leaving uncut refuges and delaying mowing mitigate<br />
the impact on pollinators (Buri et al., 2012; Humbert et al.,<br />
2012). Although there is no evidence about the effect of<br />
mowing mortality on local pollinator population dynamics<br />
and its impact on pollination, studies suggest mowing can<br />
have a negative impact.<br />
2.2.2.2.2 Logging<br />
Tree removal leads to alteration in the albedo (fraction of<br />
solar energy reflected back from earth), light regime, soil<br />
dynamics, hydrology, soil chemistry and plant composition<br />
(Foley et al., 2005), with profound effects on ecosystem<br />
structure. It is therefore expected that pollinators will also<br />
be affected by logging. Studies on logging indicate that the<br />
pollinator group and the biome play a role in the response<br />
of pollinators to logging disturbances. In tropical forests,<br />
forest fragmentation associated with logging leads to a<br />
rapid reduction in butterfly diversity and abundance (Daily<br />
and Ehrlich, 1995). In contrast, while selective logging<br />
negatively affects stingless bees (Eltz et al., 2002; Samejima<br />
et al., 2004), it can maintain the presence of some butterfly<br />
groups, at least if logging is associated with maintenance<br />
of land cover heterogeneity within the logged patch<br />
(Hamer et al., 2003; Lewis 2001). In the Western Amazon<br />
pollen deposition rate of some hardwood tree species<br />
was reduced, others were increased, while some species<br />
were unaffected at logged sites compared to non-logged<br />
forest (Maues et al., 2007). Moth diversity and abundance<br />
increased with levels of disturbance in montane rainforests<br />
(Axmacher et al., 2004), a result that agrees with works on<br />
several types of insect pollinators in temperate and boreal<br />
forests (Jackson et al., 2014; Pengelly and Cartar 2010;<br />
Romey et al., 2007). In the boreal forest of Canada there<br />
were generally more bumble bees, species of bumble<br />
bee-visited plants, and flowers in moderately (50-75%<br />
of trees remaining) logged sites, but logging affected the<br />
distribution of bumble bees across floral resources, with too<br />
many bumble bees in the flower-poor compartments and<br />
too few in the flower-rich ones than merited based on the<br />
quantity of flower resources (Cartar, 2005). Controlling for<br />
flower density, bumble bee density was significantly greater<br />
in clearcuts than in the highly (10-20% of remaining trees)<br />
or moderately logged (50-75% of trees remaining) plots.<br />
By disproportionately visiting plants in clearcuts (relative to<br />
flower density) bumble bees in clearcuts should experience<br />
higher levels of competition. Forests experiencing different<br />
levels of disturbance were also shown to harbour different<br />
plant and insect species, thus plant-pollinator networks also<br />
show different characteristics (Nielsen and Totland, 2014).<br />
2.2.2.2.3 Fire<br />
Fire is often used as a management tool for agricultural<br />
conversion and prescribed burning is used as a forest<br />
management strategy to suppress fires and improve land<br />
cover types in many regions of the world. These burnings<br />
have been shown to benefit the diversity of Lepidoptera<br />
in the Western US coniferous forests (Huntzinger, 2003),<br />
species richness of Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera in forest<br />
from the Southern Alps (Moretti et al., 2004), and species<br />
richness in central European forests (Bogusch et al., 2014).<br />
Fires in Mediterranean oak-pine forests lead to an initial<br />
strong reduction of bee diversity in recently burnt areas, with<br />
a recovery in the following years, which has been shown to<br />
be highly correlated to floral diversity (Potts et al., 2003).<br />
Fire considerably changes vegetation and land cover<br />
conditions, and therefore can have an important effect on<br />
pollinators and plant pollination, which may be detrimental<br />
(e.g., Ne’eman et al., 2000; Panzer, 2002). Burns during<br />
the growing season remove floral resources, host plants,<br />
and nesting materials, and can be detrimental to species<br />
with life stages that cannot fly to safety at the time of the<br />
burn (Hopwood et al., 2015). Burns during the dormant<br />
season can kill overwintering pollinators such as butterflies,<br />
moths, syrphid flies, and soldier beetles that overwinter at<br />
the base of plants, in leaf litter, or underneath the surface of